Iranian Center for Endodontic Research
  • Login
  • Register

Iranian Endodontic Journal

  • Register
  • Home
  • About the journal
  • Issues
    • Current
    • Archives
  • For Authors/Reviewers
    • Submissions
    • Author Guidelines
    • Ethics Policy
    • Editorial & Peer Review Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Reviewers Information
  • Indexing/Abstracting
  • Editorial Team
  • Announcements
  • Contact Us
  • Congress Proceedings
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 7 No. 4 (2012): Fall 2012
  4. Original Article

Vol. 7 No. 4 (2012)

October 2012

An In Vitro SEM Study on the Effectiveness of Smear Layer Removal of Four Different Irrigations

  • ASHOK KUMAR
  • SYED MUKHTAR -UN-NISAR ANDRABI
  • RAJENDRA K. TEWARI
  • SURRENDRA K. MISHRA
  • HUMA IFTEKHAR

Iranian Endodontic Journal, Vol. 7 No. 4 (2012), 13 October 2012 , Page 171-176
https://doi.org/10.22037/iej.v7i4.2802 Published: 2012-10-01

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Introduction The aim of this study was to compare the smear layer removal efficacies of 3% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), 17% Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), SmearClear and BioPure MTAD using a common irrigation protocol.

Materials and Methods: Fifty freshly extracted human single rooted maxillary and mandibular teeth were prepared by a ProTaper rotary system up to an apical preparation file size F3. Prepared teeth were randomly divided into five groups (n=10); distilled water (Group A; negative control), EDTA (Group B), SmearClear (Group C), BioPure MTAD (Group D) and NaOCl (Group E). After final irrigation with tested irrigants the teeth were decoronated, split into two halves longitudinally and observed under a scanning electron microscope (SEM) for removal of the smear layer. The SEM images were then analyzed for the amount of smear layer present using a three score system. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U test.

Results: Intergroup comparison of groups B, C, and D showed no statistical significant differences in the coronal and middle thirds, however, in the apical third the canal surfaces were cleaner in samples from group D (P<0.05).

Conclusion: BioPure MTAD was the most effective agent for the purpose of smear layer removal in the apical third of the root canals.
Keywords:
  • Smear Layer
  • EDTA
  • MTAD
  • Endodontic
  • Irrigation
  • Scanning Electron Microscopy
  • PDF

How to Cite

1.
KUMAR A, ANDRABI SM-U-N, TEWARI RK, MISHRA SK, IFTEKHAR H. An In Vitro SEM Study on the Effectiveness of Smear Layer Removal of Four Different Irrigations. Iran Endod J [Internet]. 2012 Oct. 1 [cited 2026 Jan. 25];7(4):171-6. Available from: https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/iej/article/view/2802
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX
  • Abstract Viewed: 374 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 366 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Make a Submission

Make a Submission

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Developed By

Open Journal Systems

Indexing/Abstracting

This journal is indexed in:

  • PubMed
  • Europe PMC
  • Scopus
  • SCImago
  • MIAR
  • CINAHL
  • CAS (Chemical Abstracts)
  • Dimensions
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • FATCAT
  • Google Scholar
  • IMEMR (Index Medicus for the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region)
  • Index Copernicus
  • ISC (Islamic World Science Citation Center)
  • Magiran
  • ROAD
  • SID (Scientific Information Database) 
  • SUDOC
  • UC Santa Barbara University
  • WIKIDATA
  • ZDB
    • This journal is Member of: COPE; ICMJ

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Browse

  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact

   Iranian Endodontic Journal is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).

Powered by OJSPlus