SBMU Journals
  • 新提交
  • 注册
  • 登录
  • 简体中文
    • English

学术急诊医学档案

  • 家
  • 关于
    • Policies
    • 编辑团队
    • Reviewer guideline
    • 联系方式
  • 问题
    • 最新一期
    • 归档
  • 公告
  • 索引/抽象
  • 对于作者
    • 新提交
    • Author guidelines
    • Article withdrawal
    • Peer review process
    • FAQ
  • 伦理
    • Ethical requirements
    • Plagiarism Policy
    • Authorship conflicts
    • Malpractice statements
    • Copyright Notice
    • Intellectual properties
    • Preprint Policy
    • 隐私声明
    • Artificial intelligence & Authorship
    • Retraction Cosiderations
##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.header.advSearch##
  1. 主页
  2. 归档
  3. 卷 14 编号 1 (2026): Continuous volume
  4. Original/Research Article

卷 14 编号 1 (2026)

十月 2025

Developing Consensus-Based Criteria for Intensive Care Unit Admission Prioritization During Mass Casualty Incidents: A Delphi Study in Iran

  • Behnam Esbakian Bandpey
  • Katayoun Jahangiri
  • Sanaz Sohrabizadeh
  • Mir Mohammad Miri
  • Abbas Ebadi
  • Hasanali Jafarpoor

学术急诊医学档案, 卷 14 编号 1 (2026), 1 十月 2025 , 第 e56 页
https://doi.org/10.22037/aaem.v14i1.3112 已出版: 2026-09-26

  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.viewArticle##
  • 下载
  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.cite##
  • 参考
  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.statastics##
  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.share##

摘要

Introduction: Mass casualty incidents create sudden surges in critical care demand that can overwhelm hospital capacity. This study aimed to develop consensus-based ICU admission criteria for mass casualty incidents. Methods: This methodological study employed a two-stage sequential design to identify, refine, and prioritize ICU admission criteria for mass casualty incidents (MCIs). First, an expert panel of 15 specialists in critical care, emergency medicine, and disaster management refined a preliminary checklist derived from a scoping review. Then, a two-round Delphi survey was conducted with 20 experts to assess consensus, and the study was reported in accordance with the CREDES recommendations. Consensus was predefined as a mean score of at least 4.0 on a five-point Likert scale. The response rate was 100%. Results: The initial checklist, which consisted of 46 criteria, was expanded to 51 items after the expert panel review. Following a two-round Delphi survey, consensus was reached on 18 criteria across six components: respiratory, cardiovascular, neurological, trauma and bleeding, multisystem, and special clinical considerations. The mean scores for these criteria ranged from 4.00 to 4.55, with the highest score being for respiratory rate at 4.55. Additionally, all retained items had an interquartile range of 1.00 to 1.25, indicating strong agreement among the experts. Conclusions: The proposed framework may serve as a preliminary decision-support tool for ICU triage in mass casualty incidents, based on expert consensus rather than clinical outcome validation. It may support equitable resource allocation and disaster preparedness, but external validation in other healthcare settings is required before broader application.

关键词:
  • Mass Casualty Incidents
  • Intensive Care Unit
  • ICU Admission
  • Patient Prioritization
  • Triage
  • Delphi Study
  • pdf (English)

##submission.howToCite##

1.
Esbakian Bandpey B, Jahangiri K, Sohrabizadeh S, Miri MM, Ebadi A, Jafarpoor H. Developing Consensus-Based Criteria for Intensive Care Unit Admission Prioritization During Mass Casualty Incidents: A Delphi Study in Iran. Arch Acad Emerg Med [网际网络]. 2026年9月26日 [见引于 2026年9月27日];14(1):e56. 载于: https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem/index.php/AAEM/article/view/3112
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.acm-sig-proceedings##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.acs-nano##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.apa##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.associacao-brasileira-de-normas-tecnicas##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.chicago-author-date##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.harvard-cite-them-right##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.ieee##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.modern-language-association##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.turabian-fullnote-bibliography##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.vancouver##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.download.ris##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.download.bibtex##

参考

1. Suda AJ, Franke A, Hertwig M, Gooßen K. Management of mass casualty incidents: a systematic review and clinical practice guideline update. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025;51(1):5.

2. Lomaglio L, Ansaloni L, Catena F, Sartelli M, Coccolini F. Mass casualty incident: definitions and current reality. In: Kluger Y, Coccolini F, Catena F, Ansaloni L, editors. WSES handbook of mass casualties incidents management. Cham: Springer; 2020. p. 1–10.

3. WHO Academy. Mass casualty preparedness and response in emergency units. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022.

4. Coombs WT, Laufer D. Global crisis management–current research and future directions. J Int Manag. 2018;24(3):199–203.

5. Haddow GD, Bullock JA, Coppola DP. Introduction to emer-gency management. 6th ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2017.

6. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. Hospital emergency response checklist: an all-hazards tool for hospital administrators and emergency managers. Copenha-gen: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe; 2011.

7. Nobakht S, Jahangiri K, Hajinabi K. Correlation of perfor-mance indicators and productivity: a cross-sectional study of emergency departments in Tehran, Iran during year 2016. Trauma Mon. 2018;23(5):1–6.

8. Zarka S, Furman E, Polyakov O. Hospital Operation During a Disaster–Hospital Multi-Component Emergency Center (HMCEC). Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2021;15(1):92–8.

9. Hasan MK, Nasrullah S, Quattrocchi A, González PA, Cas-tro-Delgado R. Hospital surge capacity preparedness in disas-ters and emergencies: a systematic review. Public health. 2023;225:12–21.

10. Sharififar S, Jahangiri K, Zareiyan A, Khoshvaghti A. Fac-tors affecting hospital response in biological disasters: A qualitative study. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2020;34:21.

11. Coppola DP. Introduction to international disaster man-agement. 1st ed. Oxford: Elsevier; 2006.

12. Bazyar J, Farrokhi M, Khankeh H. Triage systems in mass casualty incidents and disasters: a review study with a worldwide approach. Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences. 2019;7(3):482.

13. Sellers D, Ranse J. The impact of mass casualty incidents on intensive care units. Aust Crit Care. 2020;33(5):469–74.

14. Sprung CL, Joynt GM, Christian MD, Truog RD, Rello J, Nates JL. Adult ICU triage during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: who will live and who will die? Recommen-dations to improve survival. Crit Care Med. 2020;48(8):1196–1202.

15. Talmor D, Jones AE, Rubinson L, Howell MD, Shapiro NI. Simple triage scoring system predicting death and the need for critical care resources for use during epidemics. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(5):1251–6.

16. Christian MD, Hawryluck L, Wax RS, Cook T, Lazar NM, Herridge MS, et al. Development of a triage protocol for criti-cal care during an influenza pandemic. Cmaj. 2006;175(11):1377–81.

17. Adeniji KA, Cusack R. The Simple Triage Scoring System (STSS) successfully predicts mortality and critical care re-source utilization in H1N1 pandemic flu: a retrospective analysis. Crit Care. 2011;15(1):R39.

18. Christian MD, Sprung CL, King MA, Dichter JR, Kissoon N, Devereaux AV, et al. Triage: care of the critically ill and in-jured during pandemics and disasters: CHEST consensus statement. Chest. 2014;146(4):e61S–e74S.

19. Myles PR, Nguyen-Van-Tam JS, Lim WS, Nicholson KG, Brett SJ, Enstone JE, et al. Comparison of CATs, CURB-65 and PMEWS as triage tools in pandemic influenza admissions to UK hospitals: case control analysis using retrospective data. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e34428.

20. Nates JL, Nunnally M, Kleinpell R, Blosser S, Goldner J, Birriel B, et al. ICU admission, discharge, and triage guide-lines: a framework to enhance clinical operations, develop-ment of institutional policies, and further research. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(8):1553–602.

21. Soares J, Leung C, Campbell V, Van Der Vegt A, Malycha J, Andersen C. Intensive care unit admission criteria: a scoping review. Journal of the Intensive Care Society. 2024;25(3):296–307.

22. Ramirez CC, Farmer Y, Bouthillier M-E. Public voices on tie-breaking criteria and underlying values in COVID-19 tri-age protocols to access critical care: a scoping review. Discov Health Syst. 2023;2(1):16.

23. Petanidis S, Chandramouli K, Floros G, Nifakos S, Ko-lomvatsos K, Tsekeridou S, et al. Optimizing emergency re-sponse in hospitals: a systematic review of surge capacity planning and crisis resource management. Healthcare (Ba-sel). 2025;13(21):2819.

24. Esbakian Bandpey B, Jahangiri K, Sohrabizadeh S, Miri MM, Ebadi A, Jafarpoor H. Criteria for Patient Admission to the Intensive Care Unit during Mass Casualty Incidents: A Scoping Review. Trauma Monthly. 2026;31(3):1844–53.

25. Kellerhuis BE, Jenniskens K, Kusters MPT, Schuit E, Hooft L, Moons KGM, et al. Expert panel as reference standard pro-cedure in diagnostic accuracy studies: a systematic scoping review and methodological guidance. Diagn Progn Res. 2025;9(1):12.

26. Skulmoski GJ, Hartman FT, Krahn J. The Delphi method for graduate research. J Inf Technol Educ Res. 2007;6:1–21.

27. Hasson F, Keeney S, McKenna H. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs. 2000;32(4):1008–15.

28. Clayton MJ. Delphi: a technique to harness expert opin-ion for critical decision-making tasks in education. Educ Psy-chol. 1997;17(4):373–386.

29. Vernon W. The Delphi technique: a review. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2009;16(2):69–76.

30. Habibi A, Sarafrazi A, Izadyar S. Delphi technique theo-retical framework in qualitative research. Int J Eng Sci. 2014;3(4):8–13.

31. Nasa P, Jain R, Juneja D. Delphi methodology in healthcare research: how to decide its appropriateness. World J Methodol. 2021;11(4):116–129.

32. Avella JR. Delphi panels: Research design, procedures, advantages, and challenges. Int J Dr Stud. 2016;11:305–321.

33. Diamond IR, Grant RC, Feldman BM, Pencharz PB, Ling SC, Moore AM, et al. Defining consensus: a systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(4):401–9.

34. Jorm AF. Using the Delphi expert consensus method in mental health research. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2015;49(10):887–97.

35. Habibi A, Jahantigh FF, Sarafrazi A. Fuzzy Delphi tech-nique for forecasting and screening items. Asian J Res Bus Econ Manag. 2015;5(2):130–143.

36. Zhang X, Meng K, Cao J, Chen Y. Development of compe-tency framework for postgraduate anesthesia training in China: a Delphi study. BMC Med Educ. 2025;25(1):9.

37. Hsu CC, Sandford BA. The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2007;12(10):1–8.

38. Linstone HA, Turoff M, editors. The Delphi method: tech-niques and applications. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Pub-lishing Company, Advanced Book Program; 1975.

39. Guest T, Tantam G, Donlin N, Tantam K, McMillan H, Til-lyard A. An observational cohort study of triage for critical care provision during pandemic influenza:‘clipboard physi-cians’ or ‘evidenced based medicine’? Anaesthesia. 2009;64(11):1199–206.

40. Shahpori R, Stelfox HT, Doig CJ, Boiteau PJ, Zygun DA. Sequential organ failure assessment in H1N1 pandemic planning. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(4):827–32.

41. Rosenbaum L. Facing Covid-19 in Italy—ethics, logistics, and therapeutics on the epidemic’s front line. New Engl J Med. 2020;382(20):1873–5.

42. Williams C, Wheeler D. Criteria for ICU admission and se-verity of illness scoring. Surgery (Oxford). 2009;27(5):201–6.

43. Christian MD. Triage. Crit Care Clin. 2019;35(4):575.

44. Ehikhametalor K, Fisher LA, Bruce C, Aquart A, Minott J, Hanna C, et al. Guidelines for intensive care unit admission, discharge and triage. West Indian Med J. 2019;68(Suppl. 2):46–54.

45. Soleimani M, li Imani A, Bagheri S, Jafarpour H, Tang-estani F. Evaluation of patient mortality in intensive care units using the APACHE IIscoring system. Koomesh. 2014;15(3):289–94.

46. White ST, Cardenas YR, Nates JL. What every intensivist should know about intensive care unit admission criteria. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2017;29(4):414–417.

47. Blanch L, Abillama FF, Amin P, Christian M, Joynt GM, Myburgh J, et al. Triage decisions for ICU admission: report from the Task Force of the World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine. J Crit Care. 2016;36:301–5.

48. Sprung CL, Danis M, Baily MA, Chalfin DB, Dagi TF, Davila F, et al. Consensus statement on the triage of critically III pa-tients. JAMA. 1994;271(15):1200–3.

49. Persad G, Wertheimer A, Emanuel EJ. Principles for allo-cation of scarce medical interventions. The lancet. 2009;373(9661):423–31.

50. Joynt G, Gopalan P, Argent A, Chetty S, Wise R, Lai V, et al. The critical care society of Southern Africa consensus statement on ICU triage and rationing (ConICTri). Southern African Journal of Critical Care (Online). 2019;35(1):36–52.

51. Emanuel EJ, Persad G, Upshur R, Thome B, Parker M, Glickman A, et al. Fair allocation of scarce medical resources in the time of Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(21):2049–2055.

52. Smith GB, Redfern OC, Pimentel MA, Gerry S, Collins GS, Malycha J, et al. The national early warning score 2 (NEWS2). Clin Med (Northfield Il). 2019;19(3):260.

53. Smith GB, Prytherch DR, Meredith P, Schmidt PE, Feath-erstone PI. The ability of the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) to discriminate patients at risk of early cardiac ar-rest, unanticipated intensive care unit admission, and death. Resuscitation. 2013;84(4):465–70.

54. Ciottone GR, Biddinger PD, Darling RG, Fares S, Keim ME, Molloy MS, et al., editors. Ciottone's disaster medicine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2015.

55. White DB, Lo B. A framework for rationing ventilators and critical care beds during the COVID-19 pandemic. jama. 2020;323(18):1773–4.

56. Christian MD, Hawryluck L, Wax RS, Cook T, Lazar NM, Herridge MS, et al. Development of a triage protocol for criti-cal care during an influenza pandemic. Can Med Assoc J. 2006;175(11):1377–81.

57. Lerner EB, Schwartz RB, Coule PL, Weinstein ES, Cone DC, Hunt RC, et al. Mass casualty triage: an evaluation of the data and development of a proposed national guideline. Dis-aster Med Public Health Prep. 2008;2(S1): S25–S34.

58. World Health Organization. Mass casualty management systems: strategies and guidelines for building health sector capacity. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007.

59. Subbe CP, Kruger M, Rutherford P, Gemmel L. Validation of a modified Early Warning Score in medical admissions. Qjm. 2001;94(10):521–6.

60. Trinka E, Cock H, Hesdorffer D, Rossetti AO, Scheffer IE, Shinnar S, et al. A definition and classification of status epi-lepticus–Report of the ILAE Task Force on Classification of Status Epilepticus. Epilepsia. 2015;56(10):1515–23.

61. Newman ZC, Deshpande DV, Doherty J, Nikolich S, Tatebe LC, Hampton DA, et al. Risks of Failure in Advanced Trauma Life Support Courses. J Surg Res. 2026;319:18–23.

62. Boyd CR, Tolson MA, Copes WS. Evaluating trauma care: the TRISS method. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Sur-gery. 1987;27(4):370–8.

63. Rubinson L, Hick JL, Curtis JR, Branson RD, Burns S, Christian MD, et al. Definitive care for the critically ill during a disaster: Medical resources for surge capacity: From a Task Force for Mass Critical Care summit meeting, January 26–27, 2007, Chicago, IL. Chest. 2008;133(5):32S–50S.

64. Marcussen CE, Braeuner KB, Alstrøm H, Møller AM. Ac-curacy of prehospital triage systems for mass casualty inci-dents in trauma register studies-A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies. Injury. 2022;53(8):2725–33.

65. Hick JL, Hanfling D, Wynia MK, Pavia AT. Duty to plan: health care, crisis standards of care, and novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. NAM Perspect. 2020:2020. doi:10.31478/202003b.

66. Sahebi A, Golitaleb M, Jahangiri K. Survey of critical standards of patient safety in hospitals of Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Prev Med. 2021;12(1):34.

  • 摘要 ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.viewed##: 1 ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.times##
  • pdf (English) ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.downloaded##: 0 ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.times##

##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.downloadstatastics##

  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.linkedin##
  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.twitter##
  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.facebook##
  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.googleplus##
  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.telegram##

##plugins.block.makeSubmission.linkLabel##

##plugins.block.makeSubmission.linkLabel##

SJR

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

COPE

最新一期

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

消息

  • 给读者
  • 作者
  • 图书管理员
  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.footer.home##
  • 过刊
  • 投稿
  • 关于期刊
  • 编辑团队
  • 联系方式

本期刊根据以下条款发行 CC BY-NC 3.0 设计和出版 SBMU journals。所有学分和荣誉 PKP 他们的 OJS。

网站地图 | ISSN-在线:2645-4904

##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.copyright##