Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasonography for Detection of Acute Injuries of Lateral Ankle Ligaments: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
学术急诊医学档案,
卷 14 编号 1 (2026),
1 十月 2025
,
第 e20 页
https://doi.org/10.22037/aaem.v14i1.3038
摘要
Introduction: Several studies have assessed the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography for detecting acute lateral ankle ligament injuries, but their findings have been inconsistent. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the pooled diagnostic performance of ultrasonography for early detection of acute injuries of the four lateral ankle ligaments.
Methods: Major databases with a high likelihood of containing eligible studies, including Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science, were systematically searched from inception to April 2026. Diagnostic parameters were estimated using the extracted contingency table data, with MetaDisc software and the MIDAS package in Stata.
Results: 10 eligible studies, with a total of 454 patients, were included in the analyses. The sensitivity of ultrasonography for diagnosing injuries of the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL), calcaneofibular ligament (CFL), posterior talofibular ligament (PTFL), and anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL) were 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92–0.98), 0.82 (95% CI, 0.76–0.88), 0.33 (95% CI, 0.13–0.59), and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.74–0.98), respectively. The specificity for detecting injuries of the ATFL, CFL, PTFL, and AITFL was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.85–0.96), 0.90 (95% CI, 0.85–0.95), 0.96 (95% CI, 0.90–0.99), and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.78–0.92), respectively.
Conclusion: Ultrasonography demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy for detecting lateral ankle ligament injuries, particularly for the ATFL and AITFL, with strong sensitivity and specificity. It is also effective for both confirming and excluding ATFL injuries. For CFL injuries, ultrasonography shows good diagnostic performance, although it is more effective for confirming than excluding CFL pathology. In contrast, its low sensitivity for PTFL injuries limits its diagnostic reliability for this ligament.
- Ultrasonography
- Lateral Ligament, Ankle
- Diagnosis
- Meta-analysis
##submission.howToCite##
参考
1. Czajka CM, Tran E, Cai AN, DiPreta JA. Ankle sprains and instability. Med Clin North Am. 2014;98(2):313-29.
2. Doherty C, Delahunt E, Caulfield B, Hertel J, Ryan J, Bleakley C. The incidence and prevalence of ankle sprain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective epidemiological studies. Sports Med. 2014;44(1):123-40.
3. van den Bekerom MP, Oostra RJ, Golanó P, van Dijk CN. The anatomy in relation to injury of the lateral collateral ligaments of the ankle: a current concepts review. Clin Anat. 2008;21(7):619-26.
4. Salat P, Le V, Veljkovic A, Cresswell ME. Imaging in Foot and Ankle Instability. Foot Ankle Clin. 2018;23(4):499-522.e28.
5. Scillia AJ, Pierce TP, Issa K, Wright C, Callaghan JJ, Festa A, et al. Low Ankle Sprains: A Current Review of Diagnosis and Treatment. Surg Technol Int. 2017;30:411-4.
6. Wolfe MW, Uhl TL, Mattacola CG, McCluskey LC. Management of ankle sprains. Am Fam Physician. 2001;63(1):93-104.
7. Stiell IG, Greenberg GH, McKnight RD, Nair RC, McDowell I, Reardon M, et al. Decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Refinement and prospective validation. Jama. 1993;269(9):1127-32.
8. Breitenseher MJ, Trattnig S, Kukla C, Gaebler C, Kaider A, Baldt MM, et al. MRI versus lateral stress radiography in acute lateral ankle ligament injuries. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1997;21(2):280-5.
9. Gaebler C, Kukla C, Breitenseher MJ, Nellas ZJ, Mittlboeck M, Trattnig S, et al. Diagnosis of lateral ankle ligament injuries: comparison between talar tilt, MRI and operative findings in 112 athletes. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. 1997;68(3):286-90.
10. Gün C, Ünlüer EE, Vandenberk N, Karagöz A, Sentürk GO, Oyar O. Bedside ultrasonography by emergency physicians for anterior talofibular ligament injury. Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock. 2013;6(3):195-8.
11. Abdulqader SK, Shakir NA, Ahmed SA, Hassan QA. Ultrasound Accuracy in the Diagnosis of Anterior Talofibular Ligament Acute Injury: A Single-Center Study. Al-Rafidain Journal of Medical Sciences (ISSN 2789-3219). 2025;8(1):1-5.
12. Baltes TP, Arnáiz J, Geertsema L, Geertsema C, D’Hooghe P, Kerkhoffs GM, et al. Diagnostic value of ultrasonography in acute lateral and syndesmotic ligamentous ankle injuries. European radiology. 2021;31(4):2610-20.
13. Ergün T, Peker A, Aybay MN, Turan K, Muratoğlu OG, Çabuk H. Ultrasonography vıew for acute ankle ınjury: comparison of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance ımaging. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 2023;143(3):1531-6.
14. Esmailian M, Ataie M, Ahmadi O, Rastegar S, Adibi A. Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound in the diagnosis of traumatic ankle injury. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences. 2021;26(1):14.
15. Friedrich JM, Schnarkowski P, Rübenacker S, Wallner B. Ultrasonography of capsular morphology in normal and traumatic ankle joints. Journal of clinical ultrasound. 1993;21(3):179-87.
16. Hosseinian SHS, Aminzadeh B, Rezaeian A, Jarahi L, Naeini AK, Jangjui P. Diagnostic value of ultrasound in ankle sprain. The Journal of foot and ankle surgery. 2022;61(2):305-9.
17. Margetić P, Pavić R. Comparative assessment of the acute ankle injury by ultrasound and magnetic resonance. Collegium antropologicum. 2012;36(2):605-10.
18. Milz P, Mhz S, Steinborn M, Mittlmeier T, Putz R, Reiser M. Lateral ankle ligaments and tibiofibular syndesmosis: 13-MHz high-frequency sonography and MRI compared in 20 patients. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. 1998;69(1):51-5.
19. Oae K, Takao M, Uchio Y, Ochi M. Evaluation of anterior talofibular ligament injury with stress radiography, ultrasonography and MR imaging. Skeletal radiology. 2010;39(1):41-7.
20. Seok H, Lee SH, Yun SJ. Diagnostic performance of ankle ultrasound for diagnosing anterior talofibular and calcaneofibular ligament injuries: a meta-analysis. Acta Radiol. 2020;61(5):651-61.
21. Cao M, Liu S, Zhang X, Ren M, Xiao Z, Chen J, et al. Imaging diagnosis for anterior talofibular ligament injury: a systemic review with meta-analysis. Acta Radiol. 2023;64(2):612-24.
22. Lucas VS, Burk RS, Creehan S, Grap MJ. Utility of high-frequency ultrasound: moving beyond the surface to detect changes in skin integrity. Plast Surg Nurs. 2014;34(1):34-8.
23. Mamou J, Aristizába O, Silverman RH, Ketterling JA. A perspective on high-frequency ultrasound for medical applications. Phys Procedia. 2010;3(1):289-95.
- 摘要 ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.viewed##: 122 ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.times##
- pdf (English) ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.downloaded##: 132 ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.times##
