SBMU Journals
  • 新提交
  • 注册
  • 登录
  • 简体中文
    • English

学术急诊医学档案

  • 家
  • 关于
    • Policies
    • 编辑团队
    • Reviewer guideline
    • 联系方式
  • 问题
    • 最新一期
    • 归档
  • 公告
  • 索引/抽象
  • 对于作者
    • 新提交
    • Author guidelines
    • Article withdrawal
    • Peer review process
    • FAQ
  • 伦理
    • Ethical requirements
    • Plagiarism Policy
    • Authorship conflicts
    • Malpractice statements
    • Copyright Notice
    • Intellectual properties
    • Preprint Policy
    • 隐私声明
    • Artificial intelligence & Authorship
    • Retraction Cosiderations
##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.header.advSearch##
  1. 主页
  2. 归档
  3. 卷 14 编号 1 (2026): Continuous volume
  4. Review Article

卷 14 编号 1 (2026)

十月 2025

The Impact of Pain on Triage Accuracy, Hospital Admission, and Length of Stay in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review

  • Seyed Mohammad Hosseini Kasnavieh
  • Maryam Milanifard
  • Mohsen Sedighi
  • Nader Tavakoli
  • Shima Sadat Aghahosseini
  • Roxana Hessam

学术急诊医学档案, 卷 14 编号 1 (2026), 1 十月 2025 , 第 e45 页
https://doi.org/10.22037/aaem.v14i1.3032 已出版: 2026-08-25

  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.viewArticle##
  • 下载
  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.cite##
  • 参考
  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.statastics##
  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.share##

摘要

Introduction: Acute pain serves as a modifier in five-level triage systems, such as the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) and the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale (KTAS). This systematic review aimed to synthesize existing evidence on the impact of pain on triage accuracy, hospital admission, and length of stay in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED).

Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed and Google Scholar for English studies published between 2000 and 2026. Studies that reported associations between pain score, triage accuracy, hospital admission, and length of stay in patients presenting to the ED were included. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

Results: Out of 484 initial records, independent screening yielded 6 original cohort studies for final inclusion. The studies encompassed a total of 247,624 patients, with moderate to high methodological quality in the qualitative synthesis. Self-reported pain scores demonstrated no predictive relationship with admission rates or ED length of stay. However, their mandatory integration into triage protocols resulted in over-triage and reduced system accuracy. Based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, the overall certainty of evidence was determined to be moderate.

Conclusion: Self-reported pain lacks independent predictive value for hospital admission or ED length of stay, and its mandatory integration into triage systems leads to over-triage. Rather than determining acuity priority, pain assessment should be decoupled from the primary triage decision and be linked to dedicated pain-management protocols instead.

关键词:
  • Pain
  • Triage
  • Emergency Department
  • Systematic Review
  • Length of stay
  • pdf (English)

##submission.howToCite##

1.
Kasnavieh SMH, Milanifard M, Sedighi M, Tavakoli N, Aghahosseini SS, Hessam R. The Impact of Pain on Triage Accuracy, Hospital Admission, and Length of Stay in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review . Arch Acad Emerg Med [网际网络]. 2026年8月25日 [见引于 2026年9月7日];14(1):e45. 载于: https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem/index.php/AAEM/article/view/3032
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.acm-sig-proceedings##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.acs-nano##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.apa##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.associacao-brasileira-de-normas-tecnicas##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.chicago-author-date##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.harvard-cite-them-right##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.ieee##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.modern-language-association##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.turabian-fullnote-bibliography##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.vancouver##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.download.ris##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.download.bibtex##

参考

1. Al Dhefeeri AK, Aldhafeeri AM, Alsharari GA, Alhazmy MS, Alomayri MI, Alanazi HA. The importance of triage in the emergency department. Gland Surg. 2024;9(2):285-91.

2. Farrohknia N, Castrén M, Ehrenberg A, Lind L, Oredsson S, Jonsson H, et al. Emergency department triage scales and their components: a systematic review of the scientific evidence. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011;19(1):42.

3. Zachariasse JM, van der Hagen V, Seiger N, Mackway-Jones K, van Veen M, Moll HA. Performance of triage systems in emergency care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ open. 2019;9(5):e026471.

4. Tam HL, Chung SF, Lou CK. A review of triage accuracy and future direction. BMC Emerg Med. 2018;18(1):58.

5. Hinson JS, Martinez DA, Schmitz PS, Toerper M, Radu D, Scheulen J, et al. Accuracy of emergency department triage using the Emergency Severity Index and independent predictors of under-triage and over-triage in Brazil: a retrospective cohort analysis. Int J Emerg Med. 2018;11(1):3.

6. FitzGerald G, Jelinek GA, Scott D, Gerdtz MF. Emergency department triage revisited. Emerg Med J. 2010;27(2):86-92.

7. Lipp C, Dhaliwal R, Lang E. Analgesia in the emergency department: a GRADE-based evaluation of research evidence and recommendations for practice. Crit Care. 2013;17(2):212.

8. Hsu H-P, Cheng M-T, Lu T-C, Chen YC, Liao EC-W, Sung C-W, et al. Pain assessment in the emergency department: a prospective videotaped study. West J Emerg Med. 2022;23(5):716.

9. Baharuddin KA, Mohamad N, Rahman NHNA, Ahmad R, Him NASN. Assessing patient pain scores in the emergency department. Malays J Med Sci. 2010;17(1):17.

10. Ku N-W, Cheng M-T, Liew CQ, Chen YC, Sung C-W, Ko C-H, et al. Prospective study of pain and patient outcomes in the emergency department: a tale of two pain assessment methods. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2023;31(1):56.

11. Lee JH, Park YS, Park IC, Lee HS, Kim JH, Park JM, et al. Over-triage occurs when considering the patient's pain in Korean Triage and Acuity Scale (KTAS). PloS one. 2019;14(5):e0216519.

12. Scher C, Meador L, Van Cleave JH, Reid MC. Moving beyond pain as the fifth vital sign and patient satisfaction scores to improve pain care in the 21st century. Pain Manag Nurs. 2018;19(2):125-9.

13. Davis S, Ju C, Marchandise P, Diagne M, Grant L. Impact of pain assessment on canadian triage and acuity scale prediction of patient outcomes. Ann Emerg Med. 2022;79(5):433-40.

14. Moon S-H, Shim JL, Park K-S, Park C-S. Triage accuracy and causes of mistriage using the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale. PloS one. 2019;14(9):e0216972.

15. Kawchuk GN, Aaskov J, Mohler M, Lowes J, Kruhlak M, Couperthwaite S, et al. A prospective study of patients with low back pain attending a Canadian emergency department: Why they came and what happened? PLoS One. 2022;17(5):e0268123.

16. Santos MBd, Toscano CM, Batista REA, Bohomol E. Assessment of the implementation of a nurse-initiated pain management protocol in the emergency department. Rev Bras Enferm. 2021;74(3):e20201303.

17. Athlin ÅM, Carlsson M, Gunningberg L. To receive or not to receive analgesics in the emergency department: the importance of the pain intensity assessment and initial nursing assessment. Pain Manag Nurs. 2015;16(5):743-50.

18. Sokoloff C, Daoust R, Paquet J, Chauny J-M. Is adequate pain relief and time to analgesia associated with emergency department length of stay? A retrospective study. BMJ open. 2014;4(3):e004288.

  • 摘要 ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.viewed##: 17 ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.times##
  • pdf (English) ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.downloaded##: 26 ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.times##

##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.downloadstatastics##

  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.linkedin##
  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.twitter##
  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.facebook##
  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.googleplus##
  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.telegram##

##plugins.block.makeSubmission.linkLabel##

##plugins.block.makeSubmission.linkLabel##

SJR

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

COPE

最新一期

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

消息

  • 给读者
  • 作者
  • 图书管理员
  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.footer.home##
  • 过刊
  • 投稿
  • 关于期刊
  • 编辑团队
  • 联系方式

本期刊根据以下条款发行 CC BY-NC 3.0 设计和出版 SBMU journals。所有学分和荣誉 PKP 他们的 OJS。

网站地图 | ISSN-在线:2645-4904

##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.copyright##