SBMU Journals
  • 新提交
  • 注册
  • 登录
  • 简体中文
    • English

学术急诊医学档案

  • 家
  • 关于
    • Policies
    • 编辑团队
    • Reviewer guideline
    • 联系方式
  • 问题
    • 最新一期
    • 归档
  • 公告
  • 索引/抽象
  • 对于作者
    • 新提交
    • Author guidelines
    • Article withdrawal
    • Peer review process
    • FAQ
  • 伦理
    • Ethical requirements
    • Plagiarism Policy
    • Authorship conflicts
    • Malpractice statements
    • Copyright Notice
    • Intellectual properties
    • Preprint Policy
    • 隐私声明
    • Artificial intelligence & Authorship
    • Retraction Cosiderations
##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.header.advSearch##
  1. 主页
  2. 归档
  3. 卷 14 编号 1 (2026): Continuous volume
  4. Review Article

卷 14 编号 1 (2026)

十月 2025

The Primary Sources of Interruptions Experienced by Physicians and Nurses in Emergency Departments: A Scoping Review

  • Navaz Emadi
  • Rita Mojtahedzadeh
  • Seyyed Farshad Allameh
  • Kamal Basiri
  • Aeen Mohammadi

学术急诊医学档案, 卷 14 编号 1 (2026), 1 十月 2025 , 第 e11 页
https://doi.org/10.22037/aaem.v14i1.2919 已出版: 2026-02-19

  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.viewArticle##
  • 下载
  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.cite##
  • 参考
  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.statastics##
  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.share##

摘要

Introduction: Interruptions are common in emergency departments (ED) and frequently occur during critical clinical tasks. These interruptions disrupt workflow, reduce situational awareness, increase the risk of errors, and may compromise patient safety. Identifying and mapping their sources is therefore essential to guide targeted strategies and improve the quality of care. This scoping review aimed to identify and categorize the primary sources of work-related interruptions among physicians and nurses in the ED.

Methods: The review question, developed using the PCC framework (physicians and nurses; work-related interruptions; EDs), sought to identify the primary sources of interruptions in ED settings. A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar to locate peer-reviewed studies published up to September 2025. Two reviewers independently screened the studies and extracted the data.

Results: A total of 12 studies met the inclusion criteria. Reported interruption rates varied across settings and professional roles. The primary sources of interruptions were grouped into six major categories: colleague interference, phone and pager alerts, patient-initiated interruptions, family or companion interference, technical failures and lack of resources, and environmental noise. Most interruptions occurred at nursing or physician workstations and during medication preparation, documentation, or direct patient care.

Conclusion: This scoping review provides a comprehensive overview of the main sources of interruptions in ED. Understanding where and why these interruptions occur can guide the development of targeted educational, organizational, and environmental interventions. Reducing avoidable interruptions may enhance staff performance, improve patient safety, and optimize the quality of emergency care.

关键词:
  • Interruption
  • physicians
  • nurses
  • Emergency Service, Hospital (MeSH)
  • Workflow (MeSH)
  • Work-related Interruptions
  • pdf (English)

##submission.howToCite##

1.
Emadi N, Mojtahedzadeh R, Allameh SF, Basiri K, Mohammadi A. The Primary Sources of Interruptions Experienced by Physicians and Nurses in Emergency Departments: A Scoping Review. Arch Acad Emerg Med [网际网络]. 2026年2月19日 [见引于 2026年7月7日];14(1):e11. 载于: https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem/index.php/AAEM/article/view/2919
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.acm-sig-proceedings##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.acs-nano##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.apa##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.associacao-brasileira-de-normas-tecnicas##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.chicago-author-date##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.harvard-cite-them-right##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.ieee##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.modern-language-association##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.turabian-fullnote-bibliography##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.vancouver##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.download.ris##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.download.bibtex##

参考

1. Wears RL, Woloshynowych M, Brown R, Vincent CA. Reflective analysis of safety research in the hospital accident & emergency departments. Appl Ergon. 2010 Sep 1;41(5):695-700.

2. Westbrook JI, Raban MZ, Walter SR, Douglas H. Task errors by emergency physicians are associated with interruptions, multitasking, fatigue and working memory capacity: a prospective, direct observation study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Aug 1;27(8):655-63.

3. Chisholm CD, Collison EK, Nelson DR, Cordell WH. Emergency department workplace interruptions are emergency physicians “interrupt‐driven” and “multitasking”? Acad Emerg Med. 2000 Nov;7(11):1239-43.

4. Brixey JJ, Tang Z, Robinson DJ, Johnson CW, Johnson TR, Turley JP, Patel VL, Zhang J. Interruptions in a level one trauma center: a case study. Int J Med Inform. 2008 Apr 1;77(4):235-41.

5. Chisholm CD, Dornfeld AM, Nelson DR, Cordell WH. Work interrupted: a comparison of workplace interruptions in emergency departments and primary care offices. Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Aug 1;38(2):146-51.

6. Chisholm CD, Weaver CS, Whenmouth L, Giles B. A task analysis of emergency physician activities in academic and community settings. Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Aug 1;58(2):117-22.

7. Walter SR, Li L, Dunsmuir WT, Westbrook JI. Managing competing demands through task-switching and multitasking: a multi-setting observational study of 200 clinicians over 1000 hours. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Mar 1;23(3):231-41.

8. Johnson M, Sanchez P, Langdon R, Manias E, Levett‐Jones T, Weidemann G, Aguilar V, Everett B. The impact of interruptions on medication errors in hospitals: an observational study of nurses. J Nurs Manag. 2017 Oct;25(7):498-507.

9. Clapp WC, Gazzaley A. Distinct mechanisms for the impact of distraction and interruption on working memory in aging. Neurobiol Aging. 2012 Jan 1;33(1):134-48.

10. Brixey JJ, Robinson DJ, Johnson CW, Johnson TR, Turley JP, Zhang J. A concept analysis of the phenomenon interruption. Adv Nurs Sci. 2007 Jan 1;30(1):E26-42.

11. Cole G, Stefanus D, Gardner H, Levy MJ, Klein EY. The impact of interruptions on the duration of nursing interventions: a direct observation study in an academic emergency department. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Jun 1;25(6):457-65.

12. Westbrook JI, Woods A, Rob MI, Dunsmuir WT, Day RO. Association of interruptions with an increased risk and severity of medication administration errors. Arch Intern Med. 2010 Apr 26;170(8):683-90.

13. Mobeen A, Shafiq M, Aziz MH, Mohsin MJ. Impact of workflow interruptions on baseline activities of the doctors working in the emergency department. BMJ Open Qual. 2022 Sep 1;11(3):e001813.

14. Yen PY, Kelley M, Lopetegui M, Rosado AL, Migliore EM, Chipps EM et al. Understanding and Visualizing Multitasking and Task Switching Activities: A Time Motion Study to Capture Nursing Workflow. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. AMIA Symposium. 2016 Jan 1;2016:1264-1273. PMID: 28269924; PMCID: PMC5333222.

15. Walter SR, Dunsmuir WT, Westbrook JI. Studying interruptions and multitasking in situ: the untapped potential of quantitative observational studies. Int J Hum Comput Stud. 2015 Jul 1;79:118-25.

16. Westbrook JI, Coiera E, Dunsmuir WT, Brown BM, Kelk N, Paoloni R, Tran C. The impact of interruptions on clinical task completion. BMJ Qual Saf. 2010 Aug 1;19(4):284-9.

17. Jeanmonod R, Boyd M, Loewenthal M, Triner W. The nature of emergency department interruptions and their impact on patient satisfaction. Emerg Med J. 2010 May 1;27(5):376-9.

18. Berg LM, Källberg AS, Ehrenberg A, Florin J, Östergren J, Djärv T, Brixey JJ, Göransson KE. Factors influencing clinicians' perceptions of interruptions as disturbing or non-disturbing: a qualitative study. Int Emerg Nurs. 2016 Jul 1;27:11-6.

19. Berg LM, Källberg AS, Göransson KE, Östergren J, Florin J, Ehrenberg A. Interruptions in emergency department work: an observational and interview study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Aug 1;22(8):656-63.

20. Myers RA, McCarthy MC, Whitlatch A, Parikh PJ. Differentiating between detrimental and beneficial interruptions: a mixed-methods study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Nov 1;25(11):881-8.

21. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O'Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, Moher D, Peters MD, Horsley T, Weeks L, Hempel S. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Annals of internal medicine. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-73.

22. Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J. 2009 June; 26(2):91-108.

23. Weigl M, Müller A, Zupanc A, Glaser J, Angerer P. Hospital doctors' workflow interruptions and activities: an observation study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Jun 1;20(6):491-7.

24. Weigl M, Müller A, Holland S, Wedel S, Woloshynowych M. Work conditions, mental workload and patient care quality: a multisource study in the emergency department. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Jul 1;25(7):499-508.

25. Weigl M, Beck J, Wehler M, Schneider A. Workflow interruptions and stress at work: a mixed-methods study among physicians and nurses of a multidisciplinary emergency department. BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 1;7(12):e019074.

26. Forsyth KL, Hawthorne HJ, El-Sherif N, Varghese RS, Ernste VK, Koenig J, Blocker RC. Interruptions experienced by emergency nurses: Implications for subjective and objective measures of workload. J Emerg Nurs. 2018 Nov 1;44(6):614-23.

27. Schneider A, Wehler M, Weigl M. Provider interruptions and patient perceptions of care: an observational study in the emergency department. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Apr 1;28(4):296-304.

28. Eng MS, Fierro K, Abdouche S, Yu D, Schreyer KE. Perceived vs. actual distractions in the emergency department. Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Oct 1;37(10):1896-903.

29. Weigl M, Catchpole K, Wehler M, Schneider A. Workflow disruptions and provider situation awareness in acute care: An observational study with emergency department physicians and nurses. Appl Ergon. 2020 Oct 1;88:103155.

30. Kwon YE, Kim M, Choi S. Degree of interruptions experienced by emergency department nurses and interruption related factors. Int Emerg Nurs. 2021 Sep 1;58:101036.

31. Lin T, Feng X, Gao Y, Li X, Ye L, Jiang J, Tong J. Nursing interruptions in emergency room in China: An observational study. J Nurs Manag. 2021 Oct;29(7):2189-98.

32. de Freitas Junior WC, Alves VC, Silva Ramos J, Rodrigues Garbis Chagas S, Ferreira da Mata LR, Carrilho Menezes A, Teodoro Couto Ribeiro HC. Distractions and interruptions in medication preparation and administration in inpatient units. Revista Eletronica de Enfermagem. 2019 Jan 1;21.

33. AAEM (2020). Interruptions in the Emergency Department. Retrieved from the American Academy of Emergency Medicine. Available from: https://www.aaem.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/5.6.22FinalRvsdBODapvdIntrptEDfrWebPost.pdf

34. Redfern, E., Brown, R., & Vincent, C. A. (2009). Improving communication in the emergency department. Emerg Med J. 26(9), 658-661.

35. Anthony, K., Wiencek, C., Bauer, C., Daly, B., & Anthony, M. K. (2010). No interruptions please: impact of a no interruption zone on medication safety in intensive care units. Crit Care Nurse, 30(3), 21-29.

  • 摘要 ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.viewed##: 204 ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.times##
  • pdf (English) ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.downloaded##: 143 ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.times##

##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.downloadstatastics##

  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.linkedin##
  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.twitter##
  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.facebook##
  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.googleplus##
  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.telegram##

##plugins.block.makeSubmission.linkLabel##

##plugins.block.makeSubmission.linkLabel##

SJR

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

COPE

最新一期

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

消息

  • 给读者
  • 作者
  • 图书管理员
  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.footer.home##
  • 过刊
  • 投稿
  • 关于期刊
  • 编辑团队
  • 联系方式

本期刊根据以下条款发行 CC BY-NC 3.0 设计和出版 SBMU journals。所有学分和荣誉 PKP 他们的 OJS。

网站地图 | ISSN-在线:2645-4904

##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.copyright##