SBMU Journals
  • 新提交
  • 注册
  • 登录
  • 简体中文
    • English

学术急诊医学档案

  • 家
  • 关于
    • Policies
    • 编辑团队
    • Reviewer guideline
    • 联系方式
  • 问题
    • 最新一期
    • 归档
  • 公告
  • 索引/抽象
  • 对于作者
    • 新提交
    • Author guidelines
    • Article withdrawal
    • Peer review process
    • FAQ
  • 伦理
    • Ethical requirements
    • Plagiarism Policy
    • Authorship conflicts
    • Malpractice statements
    • Copyright Notice
    • Intellectual properties
    • Preprint Policy
    • 隐私声明
    • Artificial intelligence & Authorship
    • Retraction Cosiderations
##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.header.advSearch##
  1. 主页
  2. 归档
  3. 卷 13 编号 1 (2025): Continuous volume
  4. Review Article

卷 13 编号 1 (2025)

九月 2025

Identifying the Key Factors Influencing Risk Perception Among Healthcare Workers in the Context of Disasters; A Systematic Review

  • Raziyeh Bakhshi Giv
  • Mohammadreza Amiresmaili
  • Hojjat Farahmandnia
  • Ali Sadatmoosavi
  • Seyed Mobin Moradi
  • Seyyed Mohammad Reza Hosseini
  • Samaneh Alinejad

学术急诊医学档案, 卷 13 编号 1 (2025), 6 九月 2025 , 第 e83 页
https://doi.org/10.22037/aaem.v13i1.2909 已出版: 2025-12-09

  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.viewArticle##
  • 下载
  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.cite##
  • 参考
  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.statastics##
  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.share##

摘要

Introduction: Risk perception is a cognitive, multidimensional process through which individuals identify and assess potential threats. This study aimed to systematically review the recent research to identify the key factors influencing the risk perception within healthcare workers operating in critical and disaster scenarios.

Methods: This study was conducted as a systematic review in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. A search was performed for articles published between January 2014 and July 2025 in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases. Of the 2,154 initial articles, 10 eligible studies were included in the analysis following screening and quality assessment. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies addressing factors influencing healthcare workers' risk perception during disasters were selected, and the data were coded and categorized using thematic analysis.

Results: The analysis of the 10 selected studies identified a central theme titled "Factors Influencing Risk Perception," which was further divided into five key domains: 1) Demographic and individual factors, 2) Experience and exposure to risk, 3) Knowledge resources and information capital, 4) Cognitive–emotional attitudes and beliefs, and 5) Protective behaviors and measures.

Conclusion: This review demonstrates that healthcare workers' risk perception during disasters is a multifaceted phenomenon shaped by the interaction of individual, experiential, knowledge-based, emotional, and behavioral factors. Understanding these dimensions is crucial for explaining responses and designing interventions to enhance resilience and preparedness among healthcare workers. Based on the conceptual framework, it is recommended that educational programs and organizational policies consider demographic differences, experiences, and the psychosocial needs of staff.

关键词:
  • Risk perception
  • healthcare workers
  • disasters
  • systematic review
  • pdf (English)

##submission.howToCite##

1.
Bakhshi Giv R, Amiresmaili M, Farahmandnia H, Sadatmoosavi A, Moradi SM, Hosseini SMR, 等. Identifying the Key Factors Influencing Risk Perception Among Healthcare Workers in the Context of Disasters; A Systematic Review. Arch Acad Emerg Med [网际网络]. 2025年12月9日 [见引于 2026年7月7日];13(1):e83. 载于: https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem/index.php/AAEM/article/view/2909
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.acm-sig-proceedings##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.acs-nano##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.apa##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.associacao-brasileira-de-normas-tecnicas##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.chicago-author-date##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.harvard-cite-them-right##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.ieee##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.modern-language-association##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.turabian-fullnote-bibliography##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.vancouver##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.download.ris##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.download.bibtex##

参考

1. Khan A, Gupta S, Gupta SK. Multi-hazard disaster studies: Monitoring, detection, recovery, and management, based on emerging technologies and optimal techniques. International journal of disaster risk reduction. 2020;47:101642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101642

2. Hosseini Foladi S, Poursadeqiyan M, Sheikh Aboumasoudi A. Emergency first aid allocation model in prehospital triage in two-level supply chain network. Iranian journal of public health. 2023;52(4):868-9. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v52i4.12464

3. Blanchard J, Li Y, Bentley SK, Lall MD, Messman AM, Liu YT, et al. The perceived work environment and well‐being: A survey of emergency health care workers during the covid‐19 pandemic. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2022;29(7):851-61. DOI: 10.1111/acem.14519

4. Chew NW, Lee GK, Tan BY, Jing M, Goh Y, Ngiam NJ, et al. A multinational, multicentre study on the psychological outcomes and associated physical symptoms amongst healthcare workers during covid-19 outbreak. Brain, behavior, and immunity. 2020;88:559-65. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.04.049

5. Cori L, Bianchi F, Cadum E, Anthonj C. Risk perception and COVID-19. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(9):3114. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093114

6. Tahernejad S, Ghaffari S, Ariza-Montes A, Wesemann U, Farahmandnia H, Sahebi A. Post-traumatic stress disorder in medical workers involved in earthquake response: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Heliyon. 2023;9(1) https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093114

7. Liu F-Y, Sun J-X, Hao W-N. Analysis of influencing factors of risk perception among emergency nurses in china: An observational study. Medicine. 2024;103(36)

8. Ranieri J, Guerra F, Perilli E, Passafiume D, Maccarone D, Ferri C, et al. Prolonged covid 19 outbreak and psychological response of nurses in italian healthcare system: Cross-sectional study. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021;12:608413. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039570

9. Farokhzadian J, Shahrbabaki PM, Farahmandnia H, Eskici GT, Goki FS. Exploring the consequences of nurses’ involvement in disaster response: Findings from a qualitative content analysis study. BMC emergency medicine. 2024;24(1):74. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-024-00994-z

10. Chen Z, Han D, Zhang Y. Research on the relationship between psychological resilience and risk perception level of nursing staff. J Nurs Manag. 2017;17:696-8.

11. Brown VJ. Risk perception: It's personal. Environmental health perspectives. 2014;122(10):A276-9. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.122-A276

12. Zhao L, Huang H, Liu P, Xu L, Deng W, Tian F, et al. Risk perception in the era of covid-19 and related factors among nurses: A cross-sectional study. Nurs Open. 2023;10(8):5659-69. DOI: 10.1002/nop2.1811

13. Perić J, Cvetković VM. Demographic, socio-economic and phycological perspective of risk perception from disasters caused by floods: Case study belgrade. International Journal of Disaster Risk Management. 2019;1(2):31-45. DOI:10.18485/ijdrm.2019.1.2.3

14. Planić J, Cvetković V. Earthquake risk perception in belgrade: Implications for disaster risk management. Preprintsorg. 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18485/ijdrm.2022.4.1.5

15. Khan AA, Rana IA, Nawaz A. Gender-based approach for assessing risk perception in a multi-hazard environment: A study of high schools of gilgit, pakistan. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 2020;44:101427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101427

16. Chang Y, Guo S, Yuan B, Chen H, Jiang R. A large-scale survey on perceived risk, risk emotions and humanistic care needs among nurses during the covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare. 2023;16(null):1151-9. DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S400057

17. Gendeshmin SB, Rostamzadeh S, Dowlati M. Evaluation of disaster risk perception and influencing factors among hospital personnel using structural equation modeling. Scientific Reports. 2025;15(1):12780. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-97747-0

18. Nishikawa A, Yamaguchi T, Yamada Y, Urata H, Shinkawa T, Matsunari Y. How do disaster relief nurses in japan perceive and respond to risks? A cross-sectional study. Nursing Reports. 2023;13(4):1410-20. https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep13040118

19. Dryhurst S, Schneider CR, Kerr J, Freeman AL, Recchia G, Van Der Bles AM, et al. Risk perceptions of covid-19 around the world. Covid-19: Routledge; 2022. p. 162-74.

20. Griesi JM, Bernardes JM, Alonso M, Gómez-Salgado J, Ruiz-Frutos C, Fagundo-Rivera J, et al. Risk perception of healthcare workers in the first wave of the covid-19 pandemic in brazil. Heliyon. 2024;10(3) doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25297

21. Sultan MAS, Løwe Sørensen J, Carlström E, Mortelmans L, Khorram-Manesh A. Emergency healthcare providers’ perceptions of preparedness and willingness to work during disasters and public health emergencies. Healthcare. 2020;8(4):442. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8040442

22. Kuhlmann E, Behrens GMN, Cossmann A, Homann S, Happle C, Dopfer-Jablonka A. Healthcare workers' perceptions and medically approved covid-19 infection risk: Understanding the mental health dimension of the pandemic. A german hospital case study. Frontiers in Public Health. 2022;Volume 10 - 2022 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.898840

23. Portell M, Gil RM, Losilla JM, Vives J. Characterizing occupational risk perception: The case of biological, ergonomic and organizational hazards in spanish healthcare workers. The Spanish journal of psychology. 2014;17:E51. doi:10.1017/sjp.2014.55

24. Zhong Y, Liu W, Lee T-Y, Zhao H, Ji J. Risk perception, knowledge, information sources and emotional states among covid-19 patients in wuhan, china. Nursing outlook. 2021;69(1):13-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2020.08.005

25. Kellens W, Zaalberg R, Neutens T, Vanneuville W, De Maeyer P. An analysis of the public perception of flood risk on the belgian coast. Risk Analysis: An International Journal. 2011;31(7):1055-68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01571.x

26. Sultan MAS, Khorram-Manesh A, Carlström E, Sørensen JL, Sulayyim HJA, Taube F. Nurses’ readiness for emergencies and public health challenges—the case of saudi arabia. Sustainability. 2020;12(19):7874. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12197874

27. Brug J, Aro AR, Oenema A, De Zwart O, Richardus JH, Bishop GD. Sars risk perception, knowledge, precautions, and information sources, the netherlands. Emerging infectious diseases. 2004;10(8):1486. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1008.040283

28. Yang S, Cho S-I. Middle east respiratory syndrome risk perception among students at a university in south korea, 2015. American journal of infection control. 2017;45(6):e53-e60.

29. Khalid I, Khalid TJ, Qabajah MR, Barnard AG, Qushmaq IA. Healthcare workers emotions, perceived stressors and coping strategies during a mers-cov outbreak. Clinical medicine & research. 2016;14(1):7-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2017.02.013

30. Shan G, Wang W, Wang S, Chen K, Li Y. Investigation of the public’s demand for psychological assistance among henan residents during the epidemic period of corona virus disease 2019. Chine J Clin Psychol. 2020;28(4):756-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105320919177

31. Heydari A, Afzalaghaee M, Houshmand E, Shabanikiya H. Assessing the risk perception of natural disasters among the staff of hospitals in mashhad, iran. Health in Emergencies and Disasters Quarterly. 2022;7(4):227-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.32598/hdq.7.4.259.5

32. Eugene D, Nöthling J, Tarsitani L, Palantza C, Papola D, Barbui C, et al. Mental health during the covid-19 pandemic: An international comparison of gender-related home and work-related responsibilities, and social support. Archives of Women's Mental Health. 2024:1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-024-01497-3

33. Wang X, Peng L, Huang K, Deng W. Identifying the influence of disaster education on the risk perception of rural residents in geohazard-prone areas: A propensity score-matched study. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 2022;71:102795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102795

34. Arslanca T, Fidan C, Daggez M, Dursun P. Knowledge, preventive behaviors and risk perception of the covid-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study in turkish health care workers. PloS one. 2021;16(4):e0250017. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250017

35. Polychronis G, Roupa Z. Health workers' knowledge and perception regarding the risk of spread of covid-19 during the pandemic: A systematic review. Journal of public affairs. 2021;21(4):e2558. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2558

36. Woyessa AH, Teshome M, Mulatu B, Abadiga M, Hiko N, Kebede B. Disaster preparedness in selected hospitals of western ethiopia and risk perceptions of their authorities. Open access emergency medicine. 2020:219-25. https://doi.org/10.2147/oaem.s260314

37. Li X, Tang J, Shi M, et al. Analysis of the current situation of nurses’ perceived occupational risk and influencing factors in a military tertiary general hospital. J Nurs Sci. 2014;29:7-9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1481261

38. Liu L, Zhang B, Yang Z, Tang L, Gui L. Investigation on medical workers’ core emergency response competences in epidemics of infectious diseases. J Nurs Sci. 2019;34(5):75-7.

39. Gee S, Skovdal M. The role of risk perception in willingness to respond to the 2014–2016 west african ebola outbreak: A qualitative study of international health care workers. Global health research and policy. 2017;2(1):21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-017-0042-y

40. Khorram-Manesh A, Ashkenazi M, Djalali A, Ingrassia PL, Friedl T, Von Armin G, et al. Education in disaster management and emergencies: Defining a new european course. Disaster medicine and public health preparedness. 2015;9(3):245-55. https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2015.9

41. Nashwan AJ, Abujaber AA, Mohamed AS, Villar RC, Al‐Jabry MM. Nurses’ willingness to work with covid‐19 patients: The role of knowledge and attitude. Nursing open. 2021;8(2):695-701. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.674

42. Aoyagi Y, Beck CR, Dingwall R, Nguyen‐Van‐Tam JS. Healthcare workers' willingness to work during an influenza pandemic: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Influenza and other respiratory viruses. 2015;9(3):120-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/irv.12310

43. Zhang M, zhang P, Liu Y, Wang H, Hu K, Du M. Influence of perceived stress and workload on work engagement in front-line nurses during covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2021;30(11-12):1584-95. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15707

44. Price MR, Williams TC. When doing wrong feels so right: Normalization of deviance. Journal of Patient Safety. 2018;14(1) https://doi.org/10.1097/pts.0000000000000157

45. Shechter A, Diaz F, Moise N, Anstey DE, Ye S, Agarwal S, et al. Psychological distress, coping behaviors, and preferences for support among new york healthcare workers during the covid-19 pandemic. General hospital psychiatry. 2020;66:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2020.06.007

46. Olu O, Usman A, Kalambay K, Anyangwe S, Voyi K, Orach CG, et al. What should the african health workforce know about disasters? Proposed competencies for strengthening public health disaster risk management education +in africa. BMC medical education. 2018;18(1):60. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1163-9

47. Bahrami M, Aliakbari F, Aein F. Iranian nurses' perception of essential competences in disaster response: A qualitative study. Journal of education and health promotion. 2014;3:81. https://doi.org/10.4103/2277-9531.139247

48. Said NB, Chiang VCL. The knowledge, skill competencies, and psychological preparedness of nurses for disasters: A systematic review. International emergency nursing. 2020;48:100806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ienj.2019.100806

49. Rostami M, Babajani-Vafsi S, Ziapour A, Abbasian K, Mohammadimehr M, Zareiyan A. Experiences of operating room nurses in disaster preparedness of a great disaster in iran: A qualitative study. BMC emergency medicine. 2023;23(1):138. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-023-00903-w

50. Boler M, Trigiani A, Gharib H. Media education: History, frameworks, debates and challenges. In: Tierney RJ, Rizvi F, Ercikan K, editors. International encyclopedia of education (fourth edition). Oxford: Elsevier; 2023. p. 301-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-818630-5.08058-1

51. Simione L, Gnagnarella C. Differences between health workers and general population in risk perception, behaviors, and psychological distress related to covid-19 spread in italy. Frontiers in psychology. 2020;11:2166. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02166

52. Yıldırım M, Arslan G, Özaslan A. Perceived risk and mental health problems among healthcare professionals during covid-19 pandemic: Exploring the mediating effects of resilience and coronavirus fear. International journal of mental health and addiction. 2022;20(2):1035-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00424-8

53. Wang H, Liu Y, Hu K, Zhang M, Du M, Huang H, et al. Healthcare workers’ stress when caring for covid-19 patients: An altruistic perspective. Nursing Ethics. 2020;27:1490-500. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733020934146

54. Liebe U, Naumann E, Tutic A. Prosocial behavior across professional boundaries: Experimental evidence from hospitals. SAGE Open. 2019;9(2):2158244019846691. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019846691

55. Shubayr N. Operating room radiation safety measures: Awareness, compliance, and perceived risks among nurses and other healthcare workers. International Nursing Review. 2025;72(3):e13071. https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.13071

56. Cui S, Zhang L, Yan H, Shi Q, Jiang Y, Wang Q, et al. Experiences and psychological adjustments of nurses who voluntarily supported covid-19 patients in hubei province, china. Psychology Research and Behavior Management. 2020:1135-45. https://doi.org/10.2147/prbm.s283876

  • 摘要 ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.viewed##: 215 ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.times##
  • pdf (English) ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.downloaded##: 257 ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.times##

##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.downloadstatastics##

  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.linkedin##
  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.twitter##
  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.facebook##
  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.googleplus##
  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.telegram##

##plugins.block.makeSubmission.linkLabel##

##plugins.block.makeSubmission.linkLabel##

SJR

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

COPE

最新一期

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

消息

  • 给读者
  • 作者
  • 图书管理员
  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.footer.home##
  • 过刊
  • 投稿
  • 关于期刊
  • 编辑团队
  • 联系方式

本期刊根据以下条款发行 CC BY-NC 3.0 设计和出版 SBMU journals。所有学分和荣誉 PKP 他们的 OJS。

网站地图 | ISSN-在线:2645-4904

##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.copyright##