SBMU Journals
  • 新提交
  • 注册
  • 登录
  • 简体中文
    • English

学术急诊医学档案

  • 家
  • 关于
    • Policies
    • 编辑团队
    • Reviewer guideline
    • 联系方式
  • 问题
    • 最新一期
    • 归档
  • 公告
  • 索引/抽象
  • 对于作者
    • 新提交
    • Author guidelines
    • Article withdrawal
    • Peer review process
    • FAQ
  • 伦理
    • Ethical requirements
    • Plagiarism Policy
    • Authorship conflicts
    • Malpractice statements
    • Copyright Notice
    • Intellectual properties
    • Preprint Policy
    • 隐私声明
    • Artificial intelligence & Authorship
    • Retraction Cosiderations
##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.header.advSearch##
  1. 主页
  2. 归档
  3. 卷 13 编号 1 (2025): Continuous volume
  4. Original/Research Article

卷 13 编号 1 (2025)

六月 2025

Accuracy and Clinical Utility of Clinical Predictive Models for Identifying Dizziness with Central Causes; A Retrospective Diagnostic Accuracy Study

  • Shunsuke Soma
  • Katsunori Ito
  • Tsukasa Kamitani

学术急诊医学档案, 卷 13 编号 1 (2025), 6 六月 2025 , 第 e84 页
https://doi.org/10.22037/aaem.v13i1.2787 已出版: 2025-11-21

  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.viewArticle##
  • 下载
  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.cite##
  • 参考
  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.statastics##
  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.share##

摘要

Introduction: Although several clinical prediction models (CPMs) have been developed for identifying acute dizziness with central causes, their application in clinical practice remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and clinical utility of four CPMs in identifying dizziness with central lesions.

Methods: This single-center, retrospective, diagnostic accuracy study was conducted at the ED of Aomori Hospital, Japan, from April to March 2023. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of four risk stratification models (ABCD2, TriAGe+, PCI, and Sudbury) in predicting dizziness with central causes were evaluated considering the brain imaging (computed tomography (CT) scan and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)) findings, interpreted by a neurologist or neurosurgeon, as the gold standard. Calibration was evaluated visually using calibration plots. Additionally, analyses of efficacy, safety, and clinical utility using a decision curve were conducted.

Results: Of the 3,606 patients identified, 2,958 with the mean age of 65.3 ± 16.4 (range: 15-97.) years were included in the final analysis (64.7% female). 155 (5.2 %) were diagnosed with central lesions. The AUROCs were 0.67 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.62–0.71) for ABCD2, 0.80 (95% CI: 0.76–0.84) for TriAGe+, 0.82 (0.78-0.86) for PCI, and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.82–0.88) for Sudbury. TriAGe+, PCI, and Sudbury demonstrated good calibration. Among these, the Sudbury model demonstrated the highest diagnostic efficiency, was the only model to meet safety criteria, and provided the highest net benefit in decision curve analysis, particularly at lower predicted prevalence thresholds.

Conclusion: The TriAGe+, PCI, and Sudbury models demonstrated strong discriminatory performance and reliable calibration when applied during ED admission at a community hospital. Particularly, the Sudbury model may reduce false-negative outcomes for central lesions, thereby potentially minimizing the need for unnecessary neuroimaging in patients identified as low-risk.

关键词:
  • Dizziness
  • Vertigo
  • Emergency Service, Hospital
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Clinical Decision Rules
  • pdf (English)

##submission.howToCite##

1.
Soma S, Ito K, Kamitani T. Accuracy and Clinical Utility of Clinical Predictive Models for Identifying Dizziness with Central Causes; A Retrospective Diagnostic Accuracy Study . Arch Acad Emerg Med [网际网络]. 2025年11月21日 [见引于 2026年7月7日];13(1):e84. 载于: https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem/index.php/AAEM/article/view/2787
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.acm-sig-proceedings##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.acs-nano##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.apa##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.associacao-brasileira-de-normas-tecnicas##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.chicago-author-date##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.harvard-cite-them-right##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.ieee##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.modern-language-association##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.turabian-fullnote-bibliography##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.vancouver##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.download.ris##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.download.bibtex##

参考

1. Kerber KA, Meurer WJ, West BT, Fendrick AM. Dizziness presentations in U.S. emergency departments, 1995-2004. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15(8):744-50.

2. Newman-Toker DE, Hsieh YH, Camargo CA, Jr., Pelletier AJ, Butchy GT, Edlow JA. Spectrum of dizziness visits to US emergency departments: cross-sectional analysis from a nationally representative sample. Mayo Clin Proc. 2008;83(7):765-75.

3. Cheung CS, Mak PS, Manley KV, Lam JM, Tsang AY, Chan HM, et al. Predictors of important neurological causes of dizziness among patients presenting to the emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2010;27(7):517-21.

4. Kim Y, Faysel M, Balucani C, Yu D, Gilles N, Levine SR. Ischemic Stroke Predictors in Patients Presenting with Dizziness, Imbalance, and Vertigo. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018;27(12):3419-24.

5. Navi BB, Kamel H, Shah MP, Grossman AW, Wong C, Poisson SN, et al. Rate and predictors of serious neurologic causes of dizziness in the emergency department. Mayo Clin Proc. 2012;87(11):1080-8.

6. Tarnutzer AA, Lee SH, Robinson KA, Wang Z, Edlow JA, Newman-Toker DE. ED misdiagnosis of cerebrovascular events in the era of modern neuroimaging: A meta-analysis. Neurology. 2017;88(15):1468-77.

7. Kerber KA, Schweigler L, West BT, Fendrick AM, Morgenstern LB. Value of computed tomography scans in ED dizziness visits: analysis from a nationally representative sample. Am J Emerg Med. 2010;28(9):1030-6.

8. Kim AS, Sidney S, Klingman JG, Johnston SC. Practice variation in neuroimaging to evaluate dizziness in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2012;30(5):665-72.

9. Shah VP, Oliveira JESL, Farah W, Seisa M, Kara Balla A, Christensen A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of neuroimaging in emergency department patients with acute vertigo or dizziness: A systematic review and meta-analysis for the guidelines for reasonable and appropriate care in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2023;30(5):517-30.

10. Grewal K, Austin PC, Kapral MK, Lu H, Atzema CL. Missed strokes using computed tomography imaging in patients with vertigo: population-based cohort study. Stroke. 2015;46(1):108-13.

11. Navi BB, Kamel H, Shah MP, Grossman AW, Wong C, Poisson SN, et al. Application of the ABCD2 score to identify cerebrovascular causes of dizziness in the emergency department. Stroke. 2012;43(6):1484-9.

12. Kuroda R, Nakada T, Ojima T, Serizawa M, Imai N, Yagi N, et al. The TriAGe+ Score for Vertigo or Dizziness: A Diagnostic Model for Stroke in the Emergency Department. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017;26(5):1144-53.

13. Chen R, Su R, Deng M, Liu J, Hu Q, Song Z. A Posterior Circulation Ischemia Risk Score System to Assist the Diagnosis of Dizziness. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018;27(2):506-12.

14. Bi Y, Cao F. A Dynamic Nomogram to Predict the Risk of Stroke in Emergency Department Patients With Acute Dizziness. Front Neurol. 2022;13:839042.

15. Han E, Kim JH, You JS, Son WJ, Beom JH. Predictive model for diagnosing central lesions in emergency department patients with isolated dizziness who undergo diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Acad Emerg Med. 2022;29(1):15-27.

16. Ohle R, Savage DW, Roy D, McIsaac S, Singh R, Lelli D, et al. Development of a Clinical Risk Score to Risk Stratify for a Serious Cause of Vertigo in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department. Ann Emerg Med. 2025;85(2):122-31.

17. Sisk R, Sperrin M, Peek N, van Smeden M, Martin GP. Imputation and missing indicators for handling missing data in the development and deployment of clinical prediction models: A simulation study. Stat Methods Med Res. 2023;32(8):1461-77.

18. Kene MV, Ballard DW, Vinson DR, Rauchwerger AS, Iskin HR, Kim AS. Emergency Physician Attitudes, Preferences, and Risk Tolerance for Stroke as a Potential Cause of Dizziness Symptoms. West J Emerg Med. 2015;16(5):768-76.

19. Fujii K, Takada T, Kamitani T, Aoki T, Takeshima T, Kudo M, et al. Diagnostic Performance of Physician Gestalt for Bacteremia in Patients in the Process of Being Admitted With Suspected Infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2023;76(6):1074-9.

20. Yu AH, Leung LY, Leung TWH, Abrigo JM, Cheung KH, Cheng CH, et al. The TriAGe + score for vertigo or dizziness: A validation study in a university hospital emergency department in Hong Kong. Am J Emerg Med. 2024;77:39-45.

  • 摘要 ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.viewed##: 43 ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.times##
  • pdf (English) ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.downloaded##: 120 ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.times##

##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.downloadstatastics##

  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.linkedin##
  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.twitter##
  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.facebook##
  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.googleplus##
  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.telegram##

##plugins.block.makeSubmission.linkLabel##

##plugins.block.makeSubmission.linkLabel##

SJR

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

COPE

最新一期

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

消息

  • 给读者
  • 作者
  • 图书管理员
  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.footer.home##
  • 过刊
  • 投稿
  • 关于期刊
  • 编辑团队
  • 联系方式

本期刊根据以下条款发行 CC BY-NC 3.0 设计和出版 SBMU journals。所有学分和荣誉 PKP 他们的 OJS。

网站地图 | ISSN-在线:2645-4904

##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.copyright##