学术急诊医学档案

卷 13 编号 1 (2025)

Effect of Compression Rotation Intervals on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

学术急诊医学档案, 卷 13 编号 1 (2025), 6 六月 2025 , 第 e58 页
https://doi.org/10.22037/aaemj.v13i1.2704

摘要

Introduction: Reducing the compression rotation interval from 2 to 1 minute is expected to improve cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) quality. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the effect of altering the compression rotation interval on key CPR quality parameters, including compression depth, rate, and rescuer fatigue.

Methods: We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials from their inception to May 15, 2025. We searched for randomized controlled trials, simulation studies, and crossover studies that compared 1-min and 2-min compression rotation times. The assessed outcomes included compression depth, rate, correctness, and rescuer fatigue, which were reported as the standard mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI).

Results: One randomized controlled trial and seven randomized crossover studies, involving 668 rescuers in total, using manikins, were included. The 1-min rotation group exhibited significantly greater compression depth, with an increase of 2.06 mm (SMD = 2.06, 95% CI: 0.44–3.68, p < 0.001). This group demonstrated lower levels of fatigue, as indicated by a significant reduction on the visual analog scale for fatigue (SMD = −1.27, 95% CI: −2.24 to −0.30, p < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences in the compression rate or percentage of compressions that achieved adequate depth.

Conclusion: It seems that altering the chest compression rotation interval from 2 min to 1 min improves the compression depth and reduces rescuer fatigue. However, parameters, such as the compression rate and compression adequacy, remained unchanged. Notably, all the studies were conducted on manikins, thus necessitating further research to assess the applicability of these changes in real-world clinical settings.

关键词:
  • Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
  • time factors
  • chest compression
  • rotation
  • Cardiac Arrest

参考

Talikowska M, Tohira H, Finn J. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality and patient survival outcome in cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation. 2015;96:66-77.

McDonald CH, Heggie J, Jones CM, Thorne CJ, Hulme J. Rescuer fatigue under the 2010 ERC guidelines, and its effect on cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performance. Emerg Med J. 2013;30(8):623-7.

Hightower D, Thomas SH, Stone CK, Dunn K, March JA. Decay in quality of closed-chest compressions over time. Ann Emerg Med. 1995;26(3):300-3.

Kim DH, Seo YW, Jang TC. CPR quality with rotation of every 1 versus 2 minutes as characteristics of rescuers: A randomized crossover simulation study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023;102(10):e33066.

Pechaksorn N, Vattanavanit V. CPR compression rotation every one minute versus two minutes: a randomized cross-over manikin study. Emerg Med Int. 2020;2020:5479209.

Manders S, Geijsel FE. Alternating providers during continuous chest compressions for cardiac arrest: every minute or every two minutes? Resuscitation. 2009;80(9):1015-8.

Berg KM, Bray JE, Ng KC, Liley HG, Greif R, Carlson JN, et al. 2023 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Pediatric Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implemetation, and Teams; and First Aid Task Forces. Circulation. 2023;148(24):e187-e280.

Huseyin TS, Matthews AJ, Wills P, O'Neill VM. Improving the effectiveness of continuous closed chest compressions: an exploratory study. Resuscitation. 2002;54(1):57-62.

Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557-60.

Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. New York Routledge; 1988. 567 p.

Sterne J, Savović J, Page M, Elbers R, Blencowe N, Boutron I, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898.

Cobo-Vázquez C, De Blas G, García-Canas P, Del Carmen Gasco-García M. Electrophysiology of muscle fatigue in cardiopulmonary resuscitation on manikin model. Anesth Prog. 2018;65(1):30-7.

Sugerman NT, Edelson DP, Leary M, Weidman EK, Herzberg DL, Vanden Hoek TL, et al. Rescuer fatigue during actual in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation with audiovisual feedback: a prospective multicenter study. Resuscitation. 2009;80(9):981-4.

Gianotto-Oliveira R, Gianotto-Oliveira G, Gonzalez MM, Quilici AP, Andrade FP, Vianna CB, et al. Quality of continuous chest compressions performed for one or two minutes. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2015;70(3):190-5.

Kanakapriya K, Manivannan M, editors. CPR Module with Variable Chest Stiffness in High Fidelity Mannequins. CIRP Design 2012; 2013; London: Springer London.

Khanna D, Pope JE, Khanna PP, Maloney M, Samedi N, Norrie D, et al. The minimally important difference for the fatigue visual analog scale in patients with rheumatoid arthritis followed in an academic clinical practice. J Rheumatol. 2008;35(12):2339-43.

Panchal AR, Bartos JA, Cabañas JG, Donnino MW, Drennan IR, Hirsch KG, et al. Part 3: Adult Basic and Advanced Life Support: 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2020;142(16_suppl_2):S366-S468.

Olasveengen TM, Semeraro F, Ristagno G, Castren M, Handley A, Kuzovlev A, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Basic Life Support. Resuscitation. 2021;161:98-114.

Maia F, Sousa L, Santiago P. Effects ofphysical fatigue on cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality by lifeguards: a systematic review and meta-analysis International Journal of First Aid Education. 2023;6(1):70-80.

Akin S, Aribogan A, Giray S. Fatigue in CPR: A reason that causes myocardial infarction of a rescuer. Resuscitation. 2010;81(2):S73.

  • 摘要 ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.viewed##: 398 ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.times##
  • pdf (English) ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.downloaded##: 907 ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.times##

##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.downloadstatastics##

##plugins.block.makeSubmission.linkLabel##

##plugins.block.makeSubmission.linkLabel##

SJR

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

COPE

最新一期

消息