SBMU Journals
  • 新提交
  • 注册
  • 登录
  • 简体中文
    • English

学术急诊医学档案

  • 家
  • 关于
    • Policies
    • 编辑团队
    • Reviewer guideline
    • 联系方式
  • 问题
    • 最新一期
    • 归档
  • 公告
  • 索引/抽象
  • 对于作者
    • 新提交
    • Author guidelines
    • Article withdrawal
    • Peer review process
    • FAQ
  • 伦理
    • Ethical requirements
    • Plagiarism Policy
    • Authorship conflicts
    • Malpractice statements
    • Copyright Notice
    • Intellectual properties
    • Preprint Policy
    • 隐私声明
    • Artificial intelligence & Authorship
    • Retraction Cosiderations
##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.header.advSearch##
  1. 主页
  2. 归档
  3. 卷 4 编号 2 (2016): Spring (May)
  4. Original/Research Article

卷 4 编号 2 (2016)

五月 2016

Remifentanil versus Fentanyl/Midazolam in Painless Reduction of Anterior Shoulder Dislocation; a Randomized Clinical Trial

  • Mohammad Gharavifard
  • Azadeh Tafakori
  • Hamid Zamani Moghadam

学术急诊医学档案, 卷 4 编号 2 (2016), 1 五月 2016 , 第 92-96 页
https://doi.org/10.22037/aaem.v4i2.227 已出版: 2016-04-13

  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.viewArticle##
  • 下载
  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.cite##
  • 参考
  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.statastics##
  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.share##

摘要

Introduction: Performance of painful diagnostic and therapeutic procedures is common in emergency department
(ED), and procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) is a fundamental skill for every emergency physician.
This studywas aim to compare the efficacy of remifentanil with fentanyl/midazolam in painless reduction of anterior
shoulder dislocation. Methods: In this randomized, double blind, clinical trial the procedural characteristics,
patients satisfaction as well as adverse events were compared between fentanyl/midazolamand remifentanil
for PSA of 18–64 years old patients, which were presented to ED following anterior shoulder dislocation.
Results: 96 cases were randomly allocated to two groups (86.5% male). There were no significant difference between
groups regarding baseline characteristics. Remifentanil group had lower duration of procedure (2.5§1.6
versus 4.6§1.8 minutes, p Ç 0.001), higher pain reduction (53.7§13.3 versus 33.5§19.6, p Ç 0.001), lower failure
rate (1 (2.1%) versus 15 (31.3%), p Ç 0.001), higher satisfaction (p Æ 0.005). Adverse events were seen in 12 (25%)
patients in midazolam/fentanyl and 8 (16.7%) cases in remifentanil group (p Æ 0.122). Conclusion: It seems
that use of remifentanil resulted in lower procedural time, lower failure rate, and lower pain during procedure
as well as higher patient satisfaction in comparison with midazolam/fentanyl combination in anterior shoulder
dislocation.
关键词:
  • Conscious sedation
  • midazolam
  • fentanyl
  • remifentanil [supplementary concept]
  • shoulder dislocation
  • PDF (English)
  • HTML (English)

##submission.howToCite##

1.
Gharavifard M, Tafakori A, Zamani Moghadam H. Remifentanil versus Fentanyl/Midazolam in Painless Reduction of Anterior Shoulder Dislocation; a Randomized Clinical Trial. Arch Acad Emerg Med [网际网络]. 2016年4月13日 [见引于 2026年9月23日];4(2):92-6. 载于: https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem/index.php/AAEM/article/view/227
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.acm-sig-proceedings##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.acs-nano##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.apa##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.associacao-brasileira-de-normas-tecnicas##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.chicago-author-date##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.harvard-cite-them-right##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.ieee##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.modern-language-association##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.turabian-fullnote-bibliography##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.vancouver##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.download.ris##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.download.bibtex##

参考

Cordell WH, Keene KK, Giles BK, Jones JB, Jones JH,

Brizendine EJ. The high prevalence of pain in emergency

medical care. The American journal of emergency

medicine. 2002;20(3):165–9.

Godwin SA, Caro DA, Wolf SJ, et al. Clinical policy: procedural

sedation and analgesia in the emergency department.

Annals of emergencymedicine. 2005;45(2):177–96.

Marx J, Walls R, Hockberger R. Rosen’s Emergency

Medicine-Concepts and Clinical Practice: Elsevier

Health Sciences; 2013. p.

Chalidis B, Sachinis N, Dimitriou C, Papadopoulos P,

Samoladas E, Pournaras J.Has themanagement of shoulder

dislocation changed over time? International orthopaedics.

;31(3):385–9.

Fitch RW, Kuhn JE. Intraarticular lidocaine versus intravenous

procedural sedation with narcotics and benzodiazepines

for reduction of the dislocated shoulder:

a systematic review. Academic Emergency Medicine.

;15(8):703–8.

Mace SE, Barata IA, Cravero JP, et al. Clinical policy:

evidence-based approach to pharmacologic agents

used in pediatric sedation and analgesia in the emergency

department. Annals of emergency medicine.

;44(4):342–77.

Panzer O, Moitra V, Sladen RN. Pharmacology of

sedative-analgesic agents: dexmedetomidine, remifentanil,

ketamine, volatile anesthetics, and the role

of peripheral mu antagonists. Anesthesiology clinics.

;29(4):587–605.

Scott L, Perry M. Remifentanil: A review of its use during

the induction and maintenance of general anaesthesia

(vol 65, pg 1793, 2005). DRUGS. 2005;65(16):2286.

Glass PS, Gan TJ, Howell S. A review of the pharmacokinetics

and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. Anesthesia

& Analgesia. 1999;89(4S):7.

Dunn M, Mitchell R, Souza C, Drummond G. Evaluation

of propofol and remifentanil for intravenous sedation for

reducing shoulder dislocations in the emergency department.

Emergency medicine journal. 2006;23(1):57–8.

Dunn MJ,Mitchell R, DeSouza CI, Drummond GB,Waite

A. Recovery from sedation with remifentanil and propofol,

compared with morphine and midazolam, for reduction

in anterior shoulder dislocation. EmergencyMedicine Journal. 2011;28(1):6–10.

Swann A, Williams J, Fatovich DM. Recall after procedural

sedation in the emergency department. Emergency

Medicine Journal. 2007;24(5):322–4.

Cok OY, Ertan A, BahadirM. Remifentanil versus fentanyl

in combination with midazolam for retrobulbar block in

cataract surgery. Saudi medical journal. 2008;29(4):544–

Litman RS. Conscious sedation with remifentanil and

midazolam during brief painful procedures in children.

Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

;153(10):1085–8.

Rai M, Parry T, Dombrovskis A, Warner O. Remifentanil

target-controlled infusion vs propofol target-controlled

infusion for conscious sedation for awake fibreoptic intubation:

a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.

British journal of anaesthesia. 2008;100(1):125–30.

Phillips WJ, Halpin J, Jones J, McKenzie K. Remifentanil

for procedural sedation in the emergency department.

Annals of emergency medicine. 2009;53(1):163.

Sacchetti A, Jachowski J, Heisler J, Cortese T. Remifentanil

use in emergency department patients: initial experience.

EmergencyMedicine Journal. 2012;29(11):928–9.

Mamula P, Markowitz JE, Neiswender K, et al. Safety of

intravenous midazolam and fentanyl for pediatric GI endoscopy:

prospective study of 1578 endoscopies. Gastrointestinal

endoscopy. 2007;65(2):203–10.

  • 摘要 ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.viewed##: 399 ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.times##
  • PDF (English) ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.downloaded##: 211 ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.times##
  • HTML (English) ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.downloaded##: 35 ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.times##

##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.downloadstatastics##

  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.linkedin##
  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.twitter##
  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.facebook##
  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.googleplus##
  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.telegram##

##plugins.block.makeSubmission.linkLabel##

##plugins.block.makeSubmission.linkLabel##

SJR

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

COPE

最新一期

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

消息

  • 给读者
  • 作者
  • 图书管理员
  • ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.footer.home##
  • 过刊
  • 投稿
  • 关于期刊
  • 编辑团队
  • 联系方式

本期刊根据以下条款发行 CC BY-NC 3.0 设计和出版 SBMU journals。所有学分和荣誉 PKP 他们的 OJS。

网站地图 | ISSN-在线:2645-4904

##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.copyright##