Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine

Vol. 14 No. 1 (2026)

Eye-Tracking Analysis of Attention Disruptions Under Realistic Interruptions During Trauma Management; A Cross-sectional Study in a Simulated Virtual Reality

Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine, Vol. 14 No. 1 (2026), 1 October 2025 , Page e33
https://doi.org/10.22037/aaem.v14i1.3034

Abstract

Introduction: Distractions and interruptions may interfere with concentration, working memory, and timely decision-making. This study aimed to analyze the visual attention patterns of medical interns during the management of a multiple-trauma patient in a realistic virtual reality (VR) emergency scenario using eye-tracking technology integrated into VR simulation.

Methods: This cross-sectional simulation-based study was conducted among 15 medical interns at Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Participants were exposed to a 242-second high-fidelity VR trauma scenario representing a crowded ED with multiple environmental distractions and interruptions. Eye-tracking data were collected using the HTC Vive Pro Eye headset. The scenario was divided into four predefined temporal intervals. Areas of interest (AOIs) were defined and classified as relevant (main patient, key treatment team members, and essential equipment) or distractors (nonessential environmental and emotional stimuli). Main outcome measures included cumulative gaze time on relevant and distractor AOIs, gaze time outside defined AOIs, and the Relevant/Distractor ratio.

Results: A total of 253,075 gaze samples were obtained, with a mean of 16,871.7 ± 2,097.0 samples per participant. The mean duration of valid eye-tracking data was 238.5 ± 12.3 seconds per participant, corresponding to approximately 98.6% of the total scenario time. Across all intervals, gaze was predominantly directed toward relevant AOIs, and this pattern became progressively stronger over time. The Relevant/Distractor ratio increased from 3.41 ± 1.58 in the initial interval to 27.60 ± 26.12 in the final interval, while attention to distractor AOIs decreased from 19.2% to 4.7%. Spatially, the head and face of the main injured patient, the emergency medicine resident, and the patient monitor consistently attracted the greatest attention.

Conclusion: Medical interns progressively adopted a more structured and goal-directed visual attention strategy, increasingly prioritizing vital clinical information over distracting stimuli. VR-based eye tracking appears to be a feasible and informative tool for assessing attentional behavior and may support targeted educational interventions in trauma training.

Keywords:
  • Virtual reality
  • Eye tracking
  • Trauma management
  • Emergency department
  • Medical interns
  • Visual attention
  • Simulation-based education

How to Cite

1.
Emadi N, Mojtahedzadeh R, Allameh SF, Basiri K, Mohammadi A. Eye-Tracking Analysis of Attention Disruptions Under Realistic Interruptions During Trauma Management; A Cross-sectional Study in a Simulated Virtual Reality . Arch Acad Emerg Med [Internet]. 2026 Jul. 30 [cited 2026 Aug. 18];14(1):e33. Available from: https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem/index.php/AAEM/article/view/3034

References

1. Wears RL, Woloshynowych M, Brown R, Vincent CA. Reflective analysis of safety research in the hospital accident & emergency departments. Applied ergonomics. 2010 Sep 1;41(5):695-700.

2. Bouillon, B., Kanz, K. G., Lackner, C. K., Mutschler, W., & Sturm, J. (2004). Die Bedeutung des Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) im Schockraum [The importance of Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) in the emergency room]. Der Unfallchirurg, 107(10), 844–850. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-004-0847-2

3. Kamau C, Chikophe I, Abdallah A, Mogere E. Impact of advanced trauma life support training on 30-day mortality in severely injured patients at a Kenyan tertiary center: a retrospective matched case-control study. International Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2024 Oct 10;17(1):153.

4. Forsyth KL, Hawthorne HJ, El-Sherif N, Varghese RS, Ernste VK, Koenig J, Blocker RC. Interruptions experienced by emergency nurses: implications for subjective and objective measures of workload. Journal of emergency nursing. 2018 Nov 1;44(6):614-23.

5. Berg LM, Källberg AS, Göransson KE, Östergren J, Florin J, Ehrenberg A. Interruptions in emergency department work: an observational and interview study. BMJ quality & safety. 2013 Aug 1;22(8):656-63.

6. Emadi N, Mojtahedzadeh R, Allameh SF, Basiri K, Mohammadi A. The primary sources of interruptions experienced by physicians and nurses in emergency departments: a scoping review. Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2026;14(1). doi:10.22037/aaem.v14i1.2919.

7. Göras C, Olin K, Unbeck M, Pukk-Härenstam K, Ehrenberg A, Tessma MK, et al. Tasks, multitasking and interruptions among the surgical team in an operating room: a prospective observational study. BMJ open. 2019;9(5):e026410.

8. Weigl M, Catchpole K, Wehler M, Schneider A. Workflow disruptions and provider situation awareness in acute care: An observational study with emergency department physicians and nurses. Applied Ergonomics. 2020 Oct 1;88:103155.

9. Beigzadeh A, Maroufi M. Medical Students’ Learning in the High-Stress Clinical Environment of the Emergency Department. Journal of Surgery and Trauma. 2025 Sep 10;13(3):87-9.

10. Johnson KD, Alhaj-Ali A. Using simulation to assess the impact of triage interruptions. Journal of Emergency Nursing. 2017 Sep 1;43(5):435-43.

11. Hallikainen J, Niemi-Murola L. High-fidelity simulation in clinical education of emergency medicine and anaesthesiology: systematic review. inacta anaesthesiologica scandinavica 2013 aug 1 (vol. 57, pp. 7-7). 111 river st, hoboken 07030-5774, nj usa: wiley-blackwell.

12. Kaggwa MM, Agboinghale P, Marginean D, Chaimowitz GA, Olagunju AT. Embracing virtual reality in medical education. Discover Education. 2025 May 23;4(1):129.

13. Abbas JR, Chu MM, Jeyarajah C, Isba R, Payton A, McGrath B, Tolley N, Bruce I. Virtual reality in simulation-based emergency skills training: A systematic review with a narrative synthesis. Resuscitation plus. 2023 Dec 1;16:100484.

14. Mühling T, Späth I, Backhaus J, Milke N, Oberdörfer S, Meining A, Latoschik ME, König S. Virtual reality in medical emergencies training: benefits, perceived stress, and learning success. Multimedia Systems. 2023 Aug;29(4):2239-52.

15. Einloft J, Meyer HL, Bedenbender S, Morgenschweis ML, Ganser A, Russ P, Hirsch MC, Grgic I. Immersive medical training: a comprehensive longitudinal study of extended reality in emergency scenarios for large student groups. BMC Medical Education. 2024 Sep 9;24(1):978.

16. Westbrook JI, Coiera E, Dunsmuir WT, Brown BM, Kelk N, Paoloni R, Tran C. The impact of interruptions on clinical task completion. BMJ Quality & Safety. 2010 Aug 1;19(4):284-9.

17. Emadi N, Mojtahedzadeh R, Allameh SF, Basiri K, Mohammadi A. Virtual reality simulation with eye-tracking feedback versus mannequin-based training for situational awareness in trauma management under simulated emergency department interruptions in Iran: a pilot randomized controlled trial. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2026;23:8. doi:10.3352/jeehp.2026.23.8.

18. Funk MP, Navab N, Schütz L. Eye Tracking-Based Adaptive User Interfaces in Virtual Reality Eye Surgery Training. InProceedings of the 2025 Mensch und Computer 2025 2025 Aug 31 (pp. 578-582).

19. Anton, N. E., Cha, J. S., Hernandez, E., Athanasiadis, D., Yang, J., Zhou, G., Stefanidis, D., & Yu, D. (2023). Utilizing Eye Tracking to Assess Medical Student Non-Technical Performance During Scenario-Based Simulation: Results of a Pilot Study. Global surgical education : journal of the Association for Surgical Education, 2(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44186-023-00127-3

20. Zehnder EC, Schmölzer GM, van Manen M, Law BHY. Using eye-tracking augmented cognitive task analysis to explore healthcare professionals' cognition during neonatal resuscitation. Resusc Plus. 2021; 6:100119. Published 2021 Apr 12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2021.100119

21. Lavoie P, Lapierre A, Khetir I, Doherty A, Thibodeau-Jarry N, Rousseau-Saine N, Benhannache R, Crétaz M, Mailhot T. Eye-Tracking for Examining Nurses’ Attention During Cardiac Arrest Simulations: A Feasibility and Acceptability Study. Science of Nursing and Health Practices. 2024;7(1):17-33.

22. O'Meara P, Munro G, Williams B, Cooper S, Bogossian F, Ross L, Sparkes L, Browning M, McClounan M. Developing situation awareness amongst nursing and paramedicine students utilizing eye tracking technology and video debriefing techniques: a proof of concept paper. International emergency nursing. 2015 Apr 1;23(2):94-9.

23. Endsley MR. Situation awareness in dynamic systems: analysis, measurement, and implications. Human Factors. 1995;37(1):65-84.

24. Damji O, Lee-Nobbee P, Borkenhagen D, Cheng A. Analysis of eye-tracking behaviours in a pediatric trauma simulation. CJEM. 2019;21(1):138-140. https://doi.org/10.1017/cem.2018.450

25. Szulewski A, Egan R, Gegenfurtner A, et al. A new way to look at simulation-based assessment: the relationship between gaze-tracking and exam performance. CJEM. 2019;21(1):129-137. https://doi.org/10.1017/cem.2018.391

26. Roche TR, Maas EJC, Said S, et al. Anesthesia personnel's visual attention regarding patient monitoring in simulated non-critical and critical situations, an eye-tracking study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022;22(1):167. Published 2022 May 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01705-6

27. Anton N, Chen H, Yu D, et al. Nontechnical Skills Assessment in Acute Care Trauma Simulations: A Mixed Methods Approach Using Eye Tracking and Behavioral Marker Systems Military Medicine. 2024;189(Supplement_3):719-727. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usae240

28. Sipatchin A, Wahl S, Rifai K. Eye-Tracking for Clinical Ophthalmology with Virtual Reality (VR): A Case Study of the HTC Vive Pro Eye's Usability. Healthcare (Basel). 2021;9(2):180. Published 2021 Feb 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9020180

29. Hanke LI, Vradelis L, Boedecker C, et al. Immersive virtual reality for interdisciplinary trauma management - initial evaluation of a training tool prototype. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):769. Published 2024 Jul 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05764-w

30. Chan AHY, Lee WF, Van Gerven PWM, Chenkin J. Assessment of changes in gaze patterns during training in point-of-care ultrasound. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):658. Published 2022 Sep 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03680-5

31. Chen LGR, Law BHY. Use of eye-tracking to evaluate human factors in accessing neonatal resuscitation equipment and medications for advanced resuscitation: A simulation study. Front Pediatr. 2023; 11:1116893. Published 2023 Mar 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2023.1116893

32. Nakamura K, Sakai T, Abe T, et al. A team leader's gaze before and after making requests in emergency care simulation: a case study with eye-tracking glasses. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2020;6(6):369-370. Published 2020 Nov 1. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjstel-2019-000561

  • Abstract Viewed: 47 times
  • pdf Downloaded: 40 times

Download Statastics

Make a Submission

Make a Submission

SJR

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

COPE

Current Issue

Information