Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine

Vol. 14 No. 1 (2026)

Augmented Reality and Gamification vs. Traditional Surgical Instrument Training on Knowledge and Skills of Medical Students: A 2×2 Factorial Randomized Study

Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine, Vol. 14 No. 1 (2026), 1 October 2025 , Page e39
https://doi.org/10.22037/aaem.v14i1.3033

Abstract

Introduction:  Augmented reality (AR) and gamification have shown promise in medical education. This study aimed to examine their combined application in surgical instrument training for medical students.

Methods: This 2×2 factorial randomized assignment involved 164 operating room students from two universities. Participants were categorized by university and randomly allocated to four intervention groups: Group A (AR + game-based learning; n = 41), Group B (AR only; n = 41), Group C (game only; n = 41), or Group D (traditional instruction; n = 41). The 3-week intervention comprised one 30-minute session per week. Outcomes included knowledge retention (assessed at baseline, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months) and Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) performance, evaluating surgical suite recognition, instrument arrangement, instrument use, and time efficiency.

Results: Group A (AR + game) showed better knowledge retention, with scores increasing from 44.7 ± 2.2 at baseline to 84.4 ± 2.7 at 1 week and remaining stable at 3 months (71.6 ± 1.9). Group D (traditional instruction) performed worst (56.7 ± 6.8 at 1 week; 48.6 ± 6.7 at 3 months). Total OSCE scores showed a similar trend: Group A scored 86.5 ± 4.3 out of 97, compared with Group D (62.7 ± 6.2). Factorial analysis confirmed significant benefits for AR versus non-AR (knowledge gain: 76.4 ± 9.1 vs. 62.3 ± 8.7; p < 0.001) and game versus non-game interventions (75.7 ± 8.9 vs. 63.0 ± 9.3; p < 0.001). Gender effects were sporadic and explained minimal variance.

Conclusions: The integration of AR and gamification appeared to be the most effective approach in this study for improving knowledge retention and procedural proficiency in surgical instrument training. Gamification alone showed stable long-term retention and may serve as a cost-effective alternative when AR integration is not feasible.

Keywords:
  • Augmented reality
  • Gamification
  • Surgical instruments
  • Clinical competence
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Education, medical
  • Students

How to Cite

1.
Masoumian Hosseini M, Sabet B, Zolfaghari M, Qayumi K, Masoumian Hosseini ST, Rajabzadhe S, et al. Augmented Reality and Gamification vs. Traditional Surgical Instrument Training on Knowledge and Skills of Medical Students: A 2×2 Factorial Randomized Study. Arch Acad Emerg Med [Internet]. 2026 Aug. 15 [cited 2026 Aug. 18];14(1):e39. Available from: https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem/index.php/AAEM/article/view/3033

References

1. Masoumian Hosseini M, Sadat Manzari Z, Gazerani A, Masoumian Hosseini ST, Gazerani A, Rohaninasab M. Can gamified surgical sets improve surgical instrument recognition and student performance retention in the operating room? A multi-institutional experimental crossover study. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):907.

2. Shahrezaei A, Sohani M, Taherkhani S, Zarghami SY. The impact of surgical simulation and training technologies on general surgery education. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):1297.

3. Khazaei MR, Niromand E, Karami Matin A, Ramezani G. Twelve Key Strategies to Enhance Medical Education: Lessons from AMEE 2024 and Iranian Universities. International Archives of Health Sciences. 2024;11(Special Issue: Policy Briefs):322-5.

4. Leng S, Chaudhry N, Pacilli M, Nataraja RM. Evaluation of a novel home-based laparoscopic and core surgical skills programme (Monash Online Surgical Training). Surg Endosc. 2024;38(4):1813-22.

5. Qayumi K, Masoumian Hosseini ST, Masoumian Hosseini M, Nejat A, Salih M, Azimi M, et al. Enhancing medical training in conflict zones and remote areas through innovation: introducing the Canadian Virtual Medical University Initiative. EClinicalMedicine. 2024;76:102854.

6. Qayumi K, Omar F, Noora M, Masoumian Hosseini ST, Hosseini MM, Naebkhilh A, et al. A competency-based digital medical education model in conflict-affected settings. EClinicalMedicine. 2026;96:104011.

7. Samadzadeh Tabrizi N, Lin N, Polkampally S, Kuchibhotla S, Lin Y. Gamification to enhance clinical and technical skills in surgical residency: A systematic review. Am J Surg. 2025;246:116339.

8. Tene T, Vique Lopez DF, Valverde Aguirre PE, Orna Puente LM, Vacacela Gomez C. Virtual reality and augmented reality in medical education: an umbrella review. Front Digit Health. 2024;6:1365345.

9. Donkin R, Yule H, Fyfe T. Online case-based learning in medical education: a scoping review. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):564.

10. Masoumian Hosseini M, Qayumi K, Zolfaghari M, Hosseini STM, Haghighi E, Rajabzadhe S, et al. Unleashing the potential of education: embracing a new era of learning through feedback evolution. Discover Education. 2026;5(1):121.

11. Kemp K, Baxa D, Cortes C. Exploration of a Collaborative Self-Directed Learning Model in Medical Education. Med Sci Educ. 2022;32(1):195-207.

12. Yan Y, Krusing MB, Awad MM, Stefanidis D. Challenges and opportunities to advance surgical education: a qualitative study. Global Surgical Education - Journal of the Association for Surgical Education. 2025;4(1):78.

13. Jarry C, Vela J, Durán V, Van Leeuwen M, Varas J. Surgical training scalability through AI-based innovations. Global Surgical Education - Journal of the Association for Surgical Education. 2025;4(1):37.

14. Rutherford CJ. Differentiating surgical instruments: FA Davis; 2011.

15. Mayer RE. Multimedia learning, 2nd ed. New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press; 2009. 304 p.

16. Suresh D, Aydin A, James S, Ahmed K, Dasgupta P. The Role of Augmented Reality in Surgical Training: A Systematic Review. Surg Innov. 2023;30(3):366-82.

17. Garg V, Soni L, editors. Augmented Reality Enhanced Clinical Training: Implications for Skill Acquisition and Retention in Medical Education. 2024 2nd DMIHER International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare, Education and Industry (IDICAIEI); 2024 29-30 Nov. 2024.

18. Cook DA, Hatala R, Brydges R, Zendejas B, Szostek JH, Wang AT, et al. Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2011;306(9):978-88.

19. Parsons TD, Larson P, Kratz K, Thiebaux M, Bluestein B, Buckwalter JG, et al. Sex differences in mental rotation and spatial rotation in a virtual environment. Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(4):555-62.

20. Murre JM, Dros J. Replication and Analysis of Ebbinghaus' Forgetting Curve. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0120644.

21. Chen J, Liang M. Play hard, study hard? The influence of gamification on students' study engagement. Front Psychol. 2022;13:994700.

22. Vallee A, Blacher J, Cariou A, Sorbets E. Blended Learning Compared to Traditional Learning in Medical Education: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(8):e16504.

23. Tawfik MMR, Fayed AA, Dawood AF, Al Mussaed E, Ibrahim GH. Simulation-Based Learning Versus Didactic Lecture in Teaching Bronchial Asthma for Undergraduate Medical Students: a Step Toward Improvement of Clinical Competencies. Med Sci Educ. 2020;30(3):1061-8.

24. Argyriou M, Tapsis N. Reframing Multimodality in Contemporary Education: A Critical Review of Research Patterns and Pedagogical Shifts. European Journal of Open Education and E-learning Studies. 2025;10(3).

25. Luo H. Editorial: Advances in multimodal learning: pedagogies, technologies, and analytics. Front Psychol. 2023;14:1286092.

26. Lampropoulos G, Fernandez-Arias P, Del Bosque A, Vergara D. Augmented Reality in Health Education: Transforming Nursing, Healthcare, and Medical Education and Training. Nurs Rep. 2025;15(8):289.

  • Abstract Viewed: 7 times
  • pdf Downloaded: 8 times

Download Statastics

Make a Submission

Make a Submission

SJR

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

COPE

Current Issue

Information