A protocol for Data Registry system for Reconstructive Urology procedures in Iran
Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine,
Vol. 14 No. 1 (2026),
1 October 2025
,
Page e48
https://doi.org/10.22037/aaem.v14i1.2888
Abstract
Data registry systems are vital tools for systematically collecting, storing, and analyzing disease-specific data within defined patient populations. This protocol presents a national registry system designed to prospectively collect data on patients undergoing reconstructive urology surgeries in Iran.
A web-based registry involving multiple centers across Iran with official collaboration agreements will collect demographic, clinical, surgical, and follow-up data. Patients meeting inclusion criteria are enrolled following informed consent. Data confidentiality and integrity are maintained using a secure software hosted at the Men’s Health and Reproductive Health Research Center in Tehran. Standardized clinical questionnaires (IIEF) and checklists capture patient outcomes prospectively up to 27 months post-surgery.
The registry will provide epidemiological insights, monitor treatment outcomes, complications, and clinical improvements, extraction of guidelines, and policy brief, and support collaborative research nationally and internationally. This registration system was designed to achieve evidence-based data with the coherence of patient data for policy-making and therapeutic interventions.
Patients Reported Outcome Measure for Urethral Stricture Surgery. International Consultation of Incontinence Questionnaire- lower urinary tract symptoms Quality of Life.
- Iran
- Proposal
- Registries system
- Reconstructive urology
How to Cite
References
1. Adamowicz J, Kuffel B, Van Breda SV, Pokrwczynska M, Drewa T. Reconstructive urology and tissue engineering: Converging developmental paths. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2019;13(3):522-33.
2. Kim S, Buckley JC. Robotic lower urinary tract reconstruction. Urologic Clinics. 2021;48(1):103-12.
3. Drain A, Jun MS, Zhao LC. Robotic ureteral reconstruction. Urologic Clinics. 2021;48(1):91-101.
4. Choi J, Lee CU, Sung HH. Learning curve of various type of male urethroplasty. Investig Clin Urol. 2020;61(5):508.
5. Hermosa PC, Campos-Juanatey F, Malo RV, Gómez MÁC, Baños JLG. Sexual function after anterior urethroplasty: a systematic review. Translational Andrology and Urology. 2021;10(6):2554.
6. Bryk DJ, Yamaguchi Y, Zhao LC. Tissue transfer techniques in reconstructive urology. Korean Journal of Urology. 2015;56(7):478-86.
7. Hosseini J, Sharifian R, Shojaeefar E, Abouei S, Mirjalili A. Dorsal Inlay Technique and Meatal Preservation in Failed Hyposoadias: A New Surgical Technique. American Journal of Surgery and Clinical Case Reports. 2022;4(10):1-4.
8. Hosseini J, Mirjalili AM, Sharifian R, Abouei S, Tajamolian R, Samadaee Gelehkolaee K. Outcomes of HUD Versus CIC in Patients With Urethral Strictures. AJMH. 2023;17(5):15579883231202714.
9. GoyAl A, SinGh P, AhUjA A. Prevalence and severity of erectile dysfunction as assessed by IIEF-5 in North Indian type 2 diabetic males and its correlation with variables. JCDR. 2013;7(12):2936.
10. Panahi A, Bidaki R, Mehraban D, Rezahosseini O. Validity and reliability of Persian version of international prostate symptom score. GMJ. 2013;2(1):18-21.
11. Fallah-Karkan M, Hosseini MA, Azad BK, Heidarzadeh A, Hosseini J. Persian version of Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Urethral Stricture Surgery (USS-PROM) Questionnaire, Validation and Adaptation Study. Urol J. 2020;17(1):61-7.
12. Pourmomeny AA, Zargham M, Fani M. Reliability and validity of the Quality of Life Questionnaire in Iranian patients with lower urinary tract symptoms. LUTS. 2018;10(1):93-100.
- Abstract Viewed: 0 times
- pdf Downloaded: 0 times
Download Statastics
Make a Submission
SJR
COPE
