Diagnostic Value of Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate and C Reactive Protein in detecting Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis; a Cross-sectional Study
Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine,
Vol. 8 No. 1 (2020),
7 January 2020
Introduction: Osteomyelitis is one of the complications of diabetic foot infection. The present study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C reactive protein (CRP) in detection of osteomyelitis in patients with diabetic foot.
Methods: In this cross-sectional study, serum levels of ESR and CRP were measured for patients with diabetic foot referring to emergency department or endocrinology clinic and the screening performance characteristics of these markers in detection of osteomyelitis were calculated. The diagnosis of osteomyelitis was based on clinical examination and positive probe-to-bone test, which was confirmed by plain x-rays or MRI.
Results: 142 diabetic patients with an average age of 61.2 ± 11.8 years were evaluated (66.2 % male). The area under the ROC curve of ESR in detection of osteomyelitis in diabetic foot cases was 0.70 (95% CI: 0.62-0.79). The best ESR cut-off point in this regard was 49 mm/hour. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and positive and negative likelihood ratios of ESR in 49 mm/Hour cut-point were 74.6% (95% CI: 62.9-83.9), 57.7% (95% CI: 45.5-69.2), 63.9% (95% CI: 52.5-73.9), 69.5 % (95% CI: 56.0-80.0), 1.8 (95% CI: 1.3-2.4) and 0.4 (95% CI: 0.3-0.7), respectively. The area under the ROC curve of CRP in detection of osteomyelitis was 0.67 (95% CI: 0.58-0.76). The best cut-off point for CRP in this regard was 35 mg/liter with sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and positive and negative likelihood ratios of 76% (95% CI: 64.2-85), 54.9% (95% CI: 42.7-66.6), 62.8% (95% CI: 51.6-72.8), 69.6% (95% CI: 51.7-80.8), 1.7 (95% CI, 1.3-2.2), and 0.4 (95% CI: 0.3-0.7), respectively.
Conclusion: Based on the findings of ROC curve analysis, ESR and CRP had fair and poor accuracy, respectively, in detecting the diabetic foot cases with osteomyelitis.
- C-reactive protein; Diabetic foot; Blood Sedimentation; Osteomyelitis
How to Cite
Pecoraro RE, Reiber GE, Burgess EM. Pathways to diabetic limb amputation: basis for prevention. Diabetes care. 1990;13(5):513-21.
Michail M, Jude E, Liaskos C, Karamagiolis S, Makrilakis K, Dimitroulis D, et al. The performance of serum inflammatory markers for the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with osteomyelitis. The international journal of lower extremity wounds. 2013;12(2):94-9.
Abegunde DO, Mathers CD, Adam T, Ortegon M, Strong K. The burden and costs of chronic diseases in low-income and middle-income countries. The Lancet. 2007;370(9603):1929-38.
Lipsky BA, Moran GJ, Napolitano LM, Vo L, Nicholson S, Kim M. A prospective, multicenter, observational study of complicated skin and soft tissue infections in hospitalized patients: clinical characteristics, medical treatment, and outcomes. BMC infectious diseases. 2012;12(1):227.
Lipsky BA. A report from the international consensus on diagnosing and treating the infected diabetic foot. Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews. 2004;20(S1).
Lipsky BA, Berendt AR, Cornia PB, Pile JC, Peters EJ, Armstrong DG, et al. 2012 Infectious Diseases Society of America Clinical Practice Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Diabetic Foot Infections a. Clinical infectious diseases. 2012;54(12):e132-e73.
Wrobel JS, Connolly J. Making the diagnosis of osteomyelitis. The role of prevalence. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association. 1998;88(7):337-43.
Grayson ML, Gibbons GW, Balogh K, Levin E, Karchmer AW. Probing to bone in infected pedal ulcers: a clinical sign of underlying osteomyelitis in diabetic patients. Jama. 1995;273(9):721-3.
Leichter SB, Allweiss P, Harley J, Clay J, Kuperstein-Chase J, Sweeney GJ, et al. Clinical characteristics of diabetic patients with serious pedal infections. Metabolism. 1988;37(2):22-4.
Armstrong DG, Lavery LA, Sariaya M, Ashry H. Leukocytosis is a poor indicator of acute osteomyelitis of the foot in diabetes mellitus. The Journal of foot and ankle surgery. 1996;35(4):280-3.
Association AD. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes care. 2014;37(Supplement 1):S81-S90.
Asten SA, Jupiter DC, Mithani M, La Fontaine J, Davis KE, Lavery LA. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C‐reactive protein to monitor treatment outcomes in diabetic foot osteomyelitis. International wound journal. 2017;14(1):142-8.
Lavery LA, Peters EJ, Armstrong DG, Wendel CS, Murdoch DP, Lipsky BA. Risk factors for developing osteomyelitis in patients with diabetic foot wounds. Diabetes research and clinical practice. 2009;83(3):347-52.
Lipsky BA, Itani K, Norden C, Group LDFIS. Treating foot infections in diabetic patients: a randomized, multicenter, open-label trial of linezolid versus ampicillin-sulbactam/amoxicillin-clavulanate. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2004;38(1):17-24.
Kaleta JL, Fleischli JW, Reilly CH. The diagnosis of osteomyelitis in diabetes using erythrocyte sedimentation rate: a pilot study. Journal of the american podiatric medical association. 2001;91(9):445-50.
Carragee EJ, Kim D, van der Vlugt T, Vittum D. The clinical use of erythrocyte sedimentation rate in pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis. Spine. 1997;22(18):2089-93.
Jones N, Anderson D, Stiles P. Osteomyelitis in a general hospital. A five-year study showing an increase in subacute osteomyelitis. Bone & Joint Journal. 1987;69(5):779-83.
Lewis VL, Bailey MH, Pulawski G, Kind G, Bashioum RW, Hendrix RW. The diagnosis of osteomyelitis in patients with pressure sores. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 1988;81(2):229-32.
Yapıcı O, Berk H, Öztoprak N, Seyman D, Tahmaz A, Merdin A. Can ratio of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte count and erythrocyte sedimentation rate in diabetic foot infecti on predict osteomyelitis and/or amputation? Hematology reports. 2017;9(1).
- Abstract Viewed: 10 times
- pdf Downloaded: 6 times