SBMU Journals
  • New Submission
  • Register
  • Login
  • English
    • 简体中文

Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine

  • Home
  • About
    • Policies
    • Editorial Team
    • Reviewer guideline
    • Contact
  • Issues
    • Current
    • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Indexing/Abstracting
  • For authors
    • New Submission
    • Author guidelines
    • Article withdrawal
    • Peer review process
    • FAQ
  • Ethics
    • Ethical requirements
    • Plagiarism Policy
    • Authorship conflicts
    • Malpractice statements
    • Copyright Notice
    • Intellectual properties
    • Preprint Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Artificial intelligence & Authorship
    • Retraction Cosiderations
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 3 No. 3 (2015): Summer (August)
  4. Evidence-Based Emergency Medicine

Vol. 3 No. 3 (2015)

August 2015

Part 2: Positive and negative predictive values of diagnostic tests

  • Saeed Safari
  • Alireza Baratloo
  • Mohamed Elfil
  • Ahmed Said Negida

Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine, Vol. 3 No. 3 (2015), 1 August 2015 , Page 87-88
https://doi.org/10.22037/aaem.v3i3.274 Published: 2018-12-24

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • References
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

I

n volume 3, number 2, pages 48-49, we explained some screening characteristics of a diagnostic test in an educational manuscript entitled “Simple definition and calculation of accuracy, sensitivity and specificity" (1). The present article was aimed to review other screening performance characteristics including positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV). PPV and NPV are true positive and true negative results of a diagnostic test, respectively (2). In other words, if a subject receives a certain diagnosis by a test, predictive values describe how likely it is for the diagnosis to be correct

Keywords:
  • Positive predictive value
  • negative predictive value
  • diagnostic test
  • PDF
  • HTML

How to Cite

1.
Safari S, Baratloo A, Elfil M, Negida AS. Part 2: Positive and negative predictive values of diagnostic tests. Arch Acad Emerg Med [Internet]. 2018 Dec. 24 [cited 2026 May 12];3(3):87-8. Available from: https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem/index.php/AAEM/article/view/274
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

References

Baratloo A, Hosseini M, Negida A, El Ashal G. Part 1: Simple Definition and Calculation of Accuracy, Sensitivity and Specificity. Emergency. 2015;3(2):48-9.

Fletcher RH, Fletcher SW, Fletcher GS. Clinical epidemiology: the essentials: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012. p:132.

Altman DG, Bland JM. Statistics Notes: Diagnostic tests 2: predictive values. BMJ. 1994;309(6947):102.

Aminiahidashti H, Hosseininejad SM, Montazer H, Bozorgi F, Jahanian F, Raee B. Diagnostic Accuracy of Ascites Fluid Gross Appearance in Detection of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis. Emergency. 2014;2(3): 138-40.

Haghighi SHO, Begi HRM, Sorkhabi R, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound in Detection of Traumatic Lens Dislocation. Emergency. 2014;2(3): 121-4.

  • Abstract Viewed: 684 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 3306 times
  • HTML Downloaded: 55 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Make a Submission

Make a Submission

SJR

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

COPE

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact

This journal is distributed under the terms of CC BY-NC 3.0. Design and publishing by SBMU journals. All credits and honors to PKP for their OJS. 

 Sitemap | ISSN-ONLINE: 2645-4904

Support Contact: ma.saghaei63@gmail.com

With the goal of net zero carbon emissions, this journal is published only in electronic format.

Powered by OJSPlus