Accuracy of Pain Scales in Predicting Critical Diagnoses in Non-Traumatic Abdominal Pain Cases; a Cross-sectional Study
Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine,
Vol. 11 No. 1 (2023),
15 November 2022
,
Page e68
https://doi.org/10.22037/aaem.v11i1.2131
Abstract
Introduction: Accurate assessment and management of abdominal pain in the emergency department (ED) is crucial, as it can indicate potentially life-threatening conditions requiring timely treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the ability of pain scales to predict critical diagnoses in patients with non-traumatic abdominal pain.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary university hospital and involved individuals aged 15 years and above who presented to the ED with non-traumatic abdominal pain. Pain severity was evaluated using subjective pain scales, including the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and the Face Pain Scale (FPS), as well as objective pain scales, including the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) and the Non-verbal Pain Score (NVPS). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AuROC) was employed to determine the discriminative ability of each pain scale to predict critical diagnosis.
Results: 264 cases with the mean age of 47.2±19.4 years were studied (53.0% male). The most common location of abdominal pain was epigastric pain (43.9%). Most patients presented with dull-aching pain, and those with critical diagnoses had more of this characteristic than those with non-critical diagnoses. (52.5% vs. 28.3%, p = 0.01). The overall median NRS, FPS, CPOT, and NVPS of included participants were 8 (interquartile range (IQR) 7-10), 8 (IQR 6-8), 3 (IQR 1-4), and 3 (IQR 2-4), respectively. Patients with critical diagnoses had a higher NVPS score than patients with non-critical diagnoses (median score of 4 vs. 3, p = 0.02). The AuROC of NRS, FPS, CPOT, and NVPS were 0.53 (95% CI: 0.45-0.62), 0.55 (95% CI: 0.46-0.63), 0.59 (95% CI: 0.50-0.68), and 0.62 (95% CI: 0.53-0.71), respectively. The correlation coefficients among these scales were considered moderately correlated or higher.
Conclusion: In evaluating patients with non-traumatic abdominal pain, the NVPS demonstrated the highest accuracy in predicting critical diagnoses. However, all pain scales, whether subjective or objective, exhibited suboptimal performance in predicting critical diagnoses.
- Abdominal pain
- pain management
- pain scale
- pain severity
- numerical rating scale
- critical care pain observation tool
How to Cite
References
Magidson PD, Martinez JP. Abdominal pain in the geriatric patient. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2016;34(3):559-74.
Caporale N, Morselli-Labate AM, Nardi E, Cogliandro R, Cavazza M, Stanghellini V. Acute abdominal pain in the emergency department of a university hospital in Italy. United European Gastroenterol J. 2016;4(2):297-304.
Chanana L, Jegaraj MA, Kalyaniwala K, Yadav B, Abilash K. Clinical profile of non-traumatic acute abdominal pain presenting to an adult emergency department. J Family Med Prim Care. 2015;4(3):422.
Takayama Y, Kaneoka Y, Maeda A, Fukami Y, Takahashi T, Uji M. Etiologies and outcomes of emergency surgery for acute abdominal pain: an audit of 1456 cases in a single center. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020;46(2):363-9.
Dinakar P, Stillman AM. Pathogenesis of pain. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2016;23(3):201-8.
Linton SJ, Shaw WS. Impact of psychological factors in the experience of pain. Phys Ther. 2011;91(5):700-11.
Williamson A, Hoggart B. Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. J Clin Nurs. 2005;14(7):798-804.
Hjermstad MJ, Fayers PM, Haugen DF, Caraceni A, Hanks GW, Loge JH, et al. Studies comparing numerical rating scales, verbal rating scales, and visual analogue scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011;41(6):1073-93.
Todd KH. Pain assessment instruments for use in the emergency department. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2005;23(2):285-95.
Daoust R, Beaulieu P, Manzini C, Chauny J-M, Lavigne G. Estimation of pain intensity in emergency medicine: a validation study. Pain. 2008;138(3):565-70.
Lee J. Pain measurement: understanding existing tools and their application in the emergency department. Emerg Med (Fremantle). 2001;13(3):279-87.
Pathak A, Sharma S, Jensen MP. The utility and validity of pain intensity rating scales for use in developing countries. Pain rep. 2018;3(5):e672.
Mohan H, Ryan J, Whelan B, Wakai A. The end of the line? The Visual Analogue Scale and Verbal Numerical Rating Scale as pain assessment tools in the emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2010;27(5):372-5.
Thong IS, Jensen MP, Miró J, Tan G. The validity of pain intensity measures: what do the NRS, VAS, VRS, and FPS-R measure? Scand J Pain 2018;18(1):99-107.
Severgnini P, Pelosi P, Contino E, Serafinelli E, Novario R, Chiaranda M. Accuracy of Critical Care Pain Observation Tool and Behavioral Pain Scale to assess pain in critically ill conscious and unconscious patients: prospective, observational study. J Intensive Care. 2016;4:68.
Gélinas C. Pain assessment in the critically ill adult: recent evidence and new trends. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2016;34:1-11.
Chanques G, Pohlman A, Kress JP, Molinari N, de Jong A, Jaber S, et al. Psychometric comparison of three behavioural scales for the assessment of pain in critically ill patients unable to self-report. Crit Care. 2014;18(5):R160.
Khanna P, Pandey RK, Chandralekha C, Sharma A, Pangasa N. Comparison between critical-care pain observation tool and physiologic indicators for pain assessment in the critically ill, mechanically ventilated adult patients. Saudi J Anaesth. 2018;12(3):384-8.
Varndell W, Fry M, Elliott D. A systematic review of observational pain assessment instruments for use with nonverbal intubated critically ill adult patients in the emergency department: an assessment of their suitability and psychometric properties. J Clin Nurs. 2017;26(1-2):7-32.
Safikhani S, Gries KS, Trudeau JJ, Reasner D, Rüdell K, Coons SJ, et al. Response scale selection in adult pain measures: results from a literature review. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2018;2:40.
Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370(9596):1453-7.
Hartrick CT, Kovan JP, Shapiro S. The numeric rating scale for clinical pain measurement: a ratio measure? Pain Pract. 2003;3(4):310-6.
Garra G, Singer AJ, Taira BR, Chohan J, Cardoz H, Chisena E, et al. Validation of the Wong‐Baker FACES pain rating scale in pediatric emergency department patients. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17(1):50-4.
Gélinas C, Fillion L, Puntillo KA, Viens C, Fortier M. Validation of the critical-care pain observation tool in adult patients. Am J Crit Care. 2006;15(4):420-7.
Zhai Y, Cai S, Zhang Y. The diagnostic accuracy of critical care pain observation tool (CPOT) in ICU patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020;60(4):847-56. e13.
Odhner M, Wegman D, Freeland N, Steinmetz A, Ingersoll GL. Assessing pain control in nonverbal critically ill adults. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2003;22(6):260-7.
McGuire DB, Kaiser KS, Haisfield-Wolfe ME, Iyamu F. Pain assessment in noncommunicative adult palliative care patients. Nurs Clin North Am. 2016;51(3):397-431.
Lim WH, Woods N, Lamaro VP. Trends and outcomes of ruptured ovarian cysts. Postgrad Med J. 2022;98(1161):e9.
Mehta H. Abdominal pain. In: Clinical Pathways in Emergency Medicine: Springer; 2016. p. 329-45.
Pothiawala S, Gogna A. Early diagnosis of bowel obstruction and strangulation by computed tomography in emergency department. World J Emerg Med. 2012;3(3):227.
Shirai T, Mori M, Uotani T, Chida K. Gastrointestinal disorders in anaphylaxis. Intern Med. 2007;46(6):315-6.
Hajian-Tilaki K. Sample size estimation in diagnostic test studies of biomedical informatics. J Biomed Inform. 2014;48:193-204.
Zhou Y, Petpichetchian W, Kitrungrote L. Psychometric properties of pain intensity scales comparing among postoperative adult patients, elderly patients without and with mild cognitive impairment in China. Int J Nurs Stud. 2011;48(4):449-57.
Boring BL, Walsh KT, Nanavaty N, Ng BW, Mathur VA. How and why patient concerns influence pain reporting: a qualitative analysis of personal accounts and perceptions of others’ use of numerical pain scales. Front Psychol. 2021;12:663890.
Xu KT, Morris JE, Piel C. The Utility of Pain Scale to Assess Verifiable vs Non-Verifiable Pain in United States Emergency Departments. West J Emerg Med. 2021;22(2):156-62.
Haefeli M, Elfering A. Pain assessment. Eur Spine J. 2006;15(Suppl 1):S17-S24.
Wideman TH, Edwards RR, Walton DM, Martel MO, Hudon A, Seminowicz DA. The Multimodal Assessment Model of Pain: A Novel Framework for Further Integrating the Subjective Pain Experience Within Research and Practice. Clin J Pain. 2019;35(3):212-21.
Thong IS, Jensen MP, Miró J, Tan G. The validity of pain intensity measures: what do the NRS, VAS, VRS, and FPS-R measure? Scand J Pain. 2018;18(1):99-107.
Yam MF, Loh YC, Tan CS, Khadijah Adam S, Abdul Manan N, Basir R. General pathways of pain sensation and the major neurotransmitters involved in pain regulation. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(8):2164.
Topolovec-Vranic J, Gelinas C, Li Y, Pollmann-Mudryj MA, Innis J, McFarlan A, et al. Validation and evaluation of two observational pain assessment tools in a trauma and neurosurgical intensive care unit. Pain Res Manag. 2013;18(6):e107-e14.
Echegaray-Benites C, Kapoustina O, Gélinas C. Validation of the use of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) with brain surgery patients in the neurosurgical intensive care unit. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2014;30(5):257-65.
Pudas-Tähkä S-M, Salanterä S. Reliability of three linguistically and culturally validated pain assessment tools for sedated ICU patients by ICU nurses in Finland. Scand J Pain. 2018;18(2):165-73.
Klein C, Caumo W, Gélinas C, Patines V, Pilger T, Lopes A, et al. Validation of two pain assessment tools using a standardized nociceptive stimulation in critically ill adults. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018;56(4):594-601.
- Abstract Viewed: 320 times
- pdf Downloaded: 350 times
