SBMU Journals
  • New Submission
  • Register
  • Login
  • English
    • 简体中文

Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine

  • Home
  • About
    • Policies
    • Editorial Team
    • Reviewer guideline
    • Contact
  • Issues
    • Current
    • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Indexing/Abstracting
  • For authors
    • New Submission
    • Author guidelines
    • Article withdrawal
    • Peer review process
    • FAQ
  • Ethics
    • Ethical requirements
    • Plagiarism Policy
    • Authorship conflicts
    • Malpractice statements
    • Copyright Notice
    • Intellectual properties
    • Preprint Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Artificial intelligence & Authorship
    • Retraction Cosiderations
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 10 No. 1 (2022): Continuous volume
  4. Original/Research Article

Vol. 10 No. 1 (2022)

January 2022

Evaluating the Ability of PRISM4 and PIM3 to Predict Mortality in Patients Admitted to Pediatric Intensive Care Unit; a Diagnostic Accuracy Study

  • Victoria Chegini
  • Hamidreza Hatamabadi
  • Sima Jedari Attaran
  • Abolfazl Mahyar
  • Monirsadat Mirzadeh
  • Venus Chegini

Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine, Vol. 10 No. 1 (2022), 1 January 2022 , Page e58
https://doi.org/10.22037/aaem.v10i1.1738 Published: 2022-07-21

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • References
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Introduction : Limited resources and the large number of children in need of services in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) emphasize the need for effective allocation of resources for improving the outcome of at-risk patients. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the accuracy of PRISM4 and PIM3 systems in prediction of in-hospital mortality of patients admitted to PICU.

Methods: The present retrospective cross-sectional study was a diagnostic accuracy study performed on patients admitted to PICU of Qods Hospital, Qazvin, Iran, during one year. Scores of PRISM4 and PIM3 scales were calculated for each patient using the available calculators, and the outcome of patients regarding in-hospital mortality was recorded. Finally, screening performance characteristics of the mentioned scales in prediction of patients’ mortality were calculated and reported.

Results: 218 patients with the mean age of 40.68 ± 37.92 (2-160) months were studied (57.8% female). There was a significant direct correlation between PIM3 score and duration of stay in PICU (p < 0.0001; r = 0.259), need for inotropic drug administration (p = 0.001), and mortality rate (p = 0.001). In addition, area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of PIM3 and PRISM4 in prediction of mortality among patients admitted to the PICU was 0.939 (95%CI: 0.880 – 0.998) and 0.660 (95%CI: 0.371 – 0.950), respectively (p = 0.001). Based on the findings, the best cut-off point for PIM3 scale in prediction of mortality was the score of 4 and it was estimated to be the core of 8 for PRISM4 scale. Sensitivity and specificity of PIM3 scale in prediction of mortality in the cut-off of 4 points were 100.00 (95% CI: 56.09- 100.00) and 81.51 (95% CI: 75.47- 86.38), respectively. These measures were 42.85 (95%CI: 11.80- 79.76) and 98.10 (95%CI: 94.89- 99.39) for PRISM4 model, which indicates the higher sensitivity of PIM3 system in this regard.

Conclusion: based on the results of the present study, the accuracy of PIM3 is significantly higher than PRISM4 in prediction of in-hospital mortality among patients admitted to the PICU. It seems that considering the 100% sensitivity of PIM3 in prediction of outcome, this model is a better tool for screening patients who are at risk for in-hospital mortality in order to pay more attention and allocate more resources to improve their outcome.

Keywords:
  • Intensive Care Units
  • Pediatric
  • Mortality
  • Clinical Decision Rules
  • Prognosis
  • pdf

How to Cite

1.
Chegini V, Hatamabadi H, Jedari Attaran S, Mahyar A, Mirzadeh M, Chegini V. Evaluating the Ability of PRISM4 and PIM3 to Predict Mortality in Patients Admitted to Pediatric Intensive Care Unit; a Diagnostic Accuracy Study. Arch Acad Emerg Med [Internet]. 2022 Jul. 21 [cited 2026 Jul. 7];10(1):e58. Available from: https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/aaem/index.php/AAEM/article/view/1738
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

References

Taori RN, Lahiri KR, Tullu MS. Performance of PRISM (Pediatric Risk of Mortality) score and PIM (Pediatric Index of Mortality) score in a tertiary care pediatric ICU. The Indian Journal of Pediatrics. 2010;77(3):267-71.

Qiu J, Lu X, Wang K, Zhu Y, Zuo C, Xiao Z. Comparison of the pediatric risk of mortality, pediatric index of mortality, and pediatric index of mortality 2 models in a pediatric intensive care unit in China: a validation study. Medicine. 2017;96(14).

Verlaat CW, Wubben N, Visser IH, Hazelzet JA, Van der Hoeven J, Lemson J, et al. Retrospective cohort study on factors associated with mortality in high-risk pediatric critical care patients in the Netherlands. BMC pediatrics. 2019;19(1):1-6.

Shann F, Pearson G, Slater A, Wilkinson K. Paediatric index of mortality (PIM): a mortality prediction model for children in intensive care. Intensive care medicine. 1997;23(2):201-7.

Pollack MM, Ruttimann UE, Getson PR. Pediatric risk of mortality (PRISM) score. Critical care medicine. 1988;16(11):1110-6.

Ozer EA, Kizilgunesler A, Sarioglu B, Halicioglu O, Sutcuoglu S, Yaprak I. The comparison of PRISM and PIM scoring systems for mortality risk in infantile intensive care. Journal of tropical pediatrics. 2004;50(6):334-8.

Yousef RA, El Gendy FM, Abd El Aziz AA. Prognostic scoring systems in pediatric ICUs: pediatric risk of mortality III versus pediatric index of mortality 2. Alexandria Journal of Pediatrics. 2019;32(1):27.

Pollack MM, Holubkov R, Funai T, Dean JM, Berger JT, Wessel DL, et al. The Pediatric Risk of Mortality Score: Update 2015*. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine. 2016;17(1):2-9.

Straney L, Clements A, Parslow RC, Pearson G, Shann F, Alexander J, et al. Paediatric index of mortality 3: an updated model for predicting mortality in pediatric intensive care. Pediatric critical care medicine. 2013;14(7):673-81.

López MdPA, Boada N, Fernández A, Fernández AL, Ratto ME, Serrate AS, et al. Performance of the pediatric index of mortality 3 score in PICUs in Argentina: a prospective, national multicenter study. Pediatric critical care medicine. 2018;19(12):e653.

Lee OJ, Jung M, Kim M, Yang H-K, Cho J. Validation of the pediatric index of mortality 3 in a single pediatric intensive care unit in Korea. Journal of Korean medical science. 2017;32(2):365-70.

Ramazani J, Hosseini M. Comparison of the predictive ability of the pediatric risk of mortality III, pediatric index of mortality3, and pediatric logistic organ dysfunction-2 in medical and surgical intensive care units. Journal of Comprehensive Pediatrics. 2019;10(2).

Balkin EM, Steurer MA, Delagnes EA, Zinter MS, Rajagopal S, Keller RL, et al. Multicenter mortality and morbidity associated with pulmonary hypertension in the pediatric intensive care unit. Pulmonary circulation. 2018;8(1):1-11.

Gandhi J, Sangareddi S, Varadarajan P, Suresh S. Pediatric index of mortality 2 score as an outcome predictor in pediatric Intensive Care Unit in India. Indian journal of critical care medicine: peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine. 2013;17(5):288.

Kadivar M, Nourbakhsh S, Nouri K, SAMADI KP. Evaluating pediatric risk of mortality (PRISM) score in a pediatric critical setting: A prospective observational study in Children’s Medical Center. 2001.

Costa GA, Delgado AF, Ferraro A, Okay TS. Application of the pediatric risk of mortality (PRISM) score and determination of mortality risk factors in a tertiary pediatric intensive care unit. Clinics. 2010;65:1087-92.

  • Abstract Viewed: 861 times
  • pdf Downloaded: 562 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Make a Submission

Make a Submission

SJR

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

COPE

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact

This journal is distributed under the terms of CC BY-NC 3.0. Design and publishing by SBMU journals. All credits and honors to PKP for their OJS. 

 Sitemap | ISSN-ONLINE: 2645-4904

Support Contact: ma.saghaei63@gmail.com

With the goal of net zero carbon emissions, this journal is published only in electronic format.

Powered by OJSPlus