• Logo
  • SBMUJournals

Evaluation of Effective Transmission of Light Through Alveolar Bone: A Preliminary Study

Monalisa Jacob Guiselini, Alessandro Melo Deana, Marcelo Betti Mascaro, Raquel Agnelli Mesquita-Ferrari, Ana Carolina Costa Mota, Sandra Kalil Bussadori, Cristiane Miranda França, Kristianne Porta Santos Fernandes




Introduction: The aim of the present study was to determine the effective transmission of 660 and 780 nm lasers through mandibular and maxillary alveolar bones in the buccal-lingual/ palatal direction.

Methods: The laser probe was positioned in direct contact with the surface of the anterior, middle and posterior regions of each bone (5 dried maxillae and 5 mandibles) and the power meter was positioned on the bone wall opposite to the radiated wall for the measure of the remaining energy passing through the bone tissue. Ten measurements were performed with each laser at each irradiated point.

Results: Transmitted power was significantly higher in bones irradiated with 780 nm laser. Tendencies toward greater average power transmitted in the anterior region of both bones at both wavelengths were also observed.

Conclusion: Dosimetry and the choice of light source may be adjusted according to the anatomic region of the alveolar bone to be treated.


Bone; lasers; laser therapy


Huang YY, Sharma SK, Carroll J, Hamblin MR. Biphasic dose response in low-level light therapy - an update. Dose Response. 2011;9(4):602-618. doi:10.2203/dose-response.11-009.hamblin.

Chung H, Dai T, Sharma SK, Huang YY, Carroll JD, Hamblin MR. The nuts and bolts of low-level laser (light) therapy. Ann Biomed Eng. 2012;40(2):516-533.

Brignardello-Petersen R, Carrasco-Labra A, Araya I, Yanine N, Beyene J, Shah PS. Is adjuvant laser therapy effective for preventing pain, swelling, and trismus after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70(8):1789-1801. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2012.01.008.

Caprioglio C, Olivi G, Genovese MD. Lasers in dental traumatology and low-level laser therapy (LLLT). Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2011;12(2):79-84. doi:10.1007/bf03262783.

Nammour S. Laser dentistry, current advantages, and limits. Photomed Laser Surg. 2012;30(1):1-4. doi:10.1089/ pho.2012.9894.

Sutherland JC. Biological effects of polychromatic light. Photochem Photobiol. 2002;76(2):164-170.

Silva DF, Mesquita-Ferrari RA, Fernandes KP, Raele MP, Wetter NU, Deana AM. Effective transmission of light for media culture, plates and tubes. Photochem Photobiol. 2012;88:1211-1216. doi:10.1111/j.1751-1097.2012.01166.x.

Cheong W, Prahl SA, Welch AJ. Review of the Optical Properties of Biological Tissues. Quantum Electron IEEE J. 2004;26:1–20.

Sousa MV, Prates R, Kato IT. Laser scattering by transcranial rat brain illumination. Proc SPIE. 2012; 8427;28: doi:10.1117/12.912616.

Enwemeka CS. Attenuation and penetration of visible 632.8nm and invisible infra-red 904nm light in soft tissues. Laser Ther. 2003;13:95–101.

Germer CT, Roggan A, Ritz JP, et al. Optical properties of native and coagulated human liver tissue and liver metastases in the near infrared range. Lasers Surg Med. 1998;23:194-203.

Youn JI, Telenkov SA, Kim E, et al. Optical and thermal properties of nasal septal cartilage. Lasers Surg Med. 2000; 27:119-128.

Bashkatov AN, Genina EA, Kochubey VI, Tuchin VV. Optical properties of human skin, subcutaneous and mucous tissues in the wavelength range from 400 to 2000 nm. J Phys D: Appl Phys. 2005;38:2543-2555.

Holmer C, Lehmann KS, Risk J, et al. Colorectal tumors and hepatic metastases differ in their optical properties-relevance for dosimetry in laser-induced interstitial thermotherapy. Lasers Surg Med. 2006;38:296-304.

Rossi VM, Gustafson SB, Jacques SL. Characterizing light propagation in bone for photodynamic therapy of osteosarcoma. Proc SPIE. 2009;7166:0I: doi:10.1117/12.809711.

Tauber S, Baumgartner R, Schorn K, Beyer W. Light dosimetric quantitative analysis of the human petrous bone: experimental study for laser irradiation of the cochlea. Lasers Surg Med. 2001;28:18–26

Shackley DC, Whitehurst C, Moore JV, George NJ, Betts CD, Clarke NW. Light penetration in bladder tissue: implications for the intravesical photodynamic therapy of bladder tumours. BJU Int. 2000;86:638-643. doi:10.1046/ j.1464-410x.2000.00872.x.

Katranji A, Misch K, Wang HL. Cortical bone thickness in dentate and edentulous human cadavers. J Periodontol. 2007;78(5):874-878.

Turkyilmaz I, Tozum TF, Tumer C. Bone density assessments of oral implant sites using computerized tomography. J Oral Rehabil. 2007;34:267-272. doi:10.1111/ j.1365-2842.2006.01689.x.

Fuh LJ, Huang HL, Chen CS, et al. Variations in bone density at dental implant sites in different regions of the jawbone. J Oral Rehabil. 2010;37:346-351. doi:10.1111/ j.1365-2842.2010.02061.x.

Jonasson G, Kiliaridis S, Gunnarsson R. Cervical thickness of the mandibular alveolar process and skeletal bone mineral density. Acta Odontol Scand. 1999;57(3):155-161. doi:10.1080/000163599428896.

Blok Y, Gravesteijn FA, van Ruijven LJ, Koolstra JH. Micro-architecture and mineralization of the human alveolar bone obtained with microCT. Arch Oral Biol. 2013;58(6):621- 627. doi:10.1016/j.archoralbio.2012.10.001.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22037/jlms.v7i3.8642