Comparison of static and agitated aerated composting efficacies in the stabilization of industrial slaughterhouse solid wastes

Zohreh Ebraheempoor, MSc of Environmental Health Engineering, Taghi Samadi, Reza Shokuhi, Ghorban Asgari



Background and Aims: Slaughterhouse waste contains putrescible intestinal wastes as well as organic solids with high levels of pathogenic microorganisms. The management of these wastes is therefore necessary to succeed in preventing the spread of infectious agents. This study set out with the aim of assessing the static aerated pile and agitated aerated pile in the composting of industrial slaughterhouse wastes.
Materials and Methods: At every stage of this research, basic parameters such as Carbon: Nitrogen ratio (C:N), were measured. The influence of carbon-to-nitrogen (C:N) ratio, phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) concentrations, pH, electrical conductivity (EC), Ash content, and temperature in the composting pile was studied.
Results: On the question of studied variables, this study found that static aerated pile achieved a C: N ratio of 15.59, P 3.16%, K 2.16%, pH 7.08, EC 1586 μS/cm, and Ash content of 16.88% by weight. The corresponding values in the case of agitated aerated pile were respectively as 18.68, 3.02%, 2.35%, 7.2, 1423 μS/cm and 20.78%.
Conclusion: In general, it seems that both static aerated pile and agitated aerated pile well performed in composting and stabilization of slaughterhouse solid wastes. Both processes produced suitably qualified
compost as well.
Key words: Composting, Static, Agitated, Slaughterhouse, Hamedan

Full Text:



Edström M, Nordberg A, Thyselius L. Anaerobic treatment of animal byproducts from slaughterhouses at laboratory and pilot scale. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 2003; 13 (109): 127-138.

Hejnfelt A, Angelidaki I. Anaerobic digestion of slaughterhouse by-products. Biomass and Bioenergy 2009; 33(8): 1046-1054.

Hossaini H, Fatehizadeh A, Yousefi N, Reshadat S, Rajabi Gilan N, Ghasemi S R. Application of enhanced softening process in slaughterhouse wastewater treatment. Indian Journal of Chemical Technology 2013; 20: 217-221.

Salminen E, Rintala J. Anaerobic digestion of organic solid poultry slaughterhouse waste – a review. Bioresource Technology 2002; 83: 13–26.

Banks CJ. Anaerobic digestion of solid and high nitrogen content fractions of slaughterhouse wastes. Environmentally Responsible Food Processing 1994; 90: 48–55.

Said-Pullicino D, Kaiser K, Guggenberger G, Gigliotti G. Changes in the chemical composition of waterextractable organic matter during composting: Distribution between stable and labile organic matter pools. Chemosphere 2007; 66: 2166–2176.

Cáceres R, Flotats X, Marfà O. Changes in the chemical and physicochemical properties of the solid fraction of cattle slurry during composting using different aeration strategies. Waste Management 2006; 26: 1081–1091.

Bolta SV, Mihelic R, Lobnik F, Lestan D. Microbial community structure during composting with and without mass inocula. Compost Science and Utilization 2003; 11: 6–15.

Mathur SP, Patni N K, Lvesque M P. Static Pile, Passive Aeration Composting of Manure Slurries Using Peat as a Bulking Agent. Biological Wastes 1990; 34: 323-333.

Fernandes L, Zhan W. Temperature Distribution And Variation In Passively Aerated Static Compost Piles. Bioresource Technology 1994; 48: 257-263.

Samadi M.T, Kashitrash Esfahani Z, Nadafi K. Comparison The Efficacy Of Fenton And nZVI+H2O2 Process in Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Leachate Treatment; Case Study Hamadan Landfill Leachate. Int. J. Environ. Res 2013; 7(1): 187-194.

Sellami F, Jarboui R, Hachicha S, Medhioub K, Ammar E. Co-composting of oil exhausted olive-cake, poultry manure and industrial residues of agro-food activity for soil amendment. Bioresource Technology 2008; 99: 1177–1188.

Zhu N. Composting of high moisture content swine manure with corncob in a pilot-scale aerated static bin system. Bioresource Technology 2006; 97: 1870–1875.

Sa´nchez-Arias V, Ferna´ndez FJ, Villasenr J, Rodrı´guez L. Enhancing the co-composting of olive mill wastes and sewage sludge by the addition of an industrial waste. Bioresource Technology 2008; 99: 6346– 6353.

Fang M, Wong JWC, Li GX, Wong MH. Changes in biological parameters during co-composting of sewage sludge and coal ash residues. Bioresource Technology 1998; 64: 55–61.

Nair J, Okamitsu K. Microbial inoculants for small scale composting of putrescible kitchen wastes. Waste Management 2010; 30: 977–982. /24

Composting council of Canada. Setting the standard:a summary of compost standard in Canada. Available from: www.compost. org/standard. Accessed Jun 14, 2008.

Cofiea O, Koneb D, Rothenbergerb S, Moserb D, Zubrueggb C. Co-composting of faecal sludge and organic solid waste for agriculture: Process dynamics. Water research 2009; 43: 4665 – 4675.

Tchobanoglous G, Kreith F. Handbook of Solid Waste Management. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw- Hill. 2002.

World Health Organization, 2006. In: Guidelines for the Safe Use of Wastewater, Excreta and Greywater, vol. 4. WHO, Geneva.

Iniguez G, Crohn D M. Utilization of by-products from the tequila industry. part 6: fertilization of potted geranium with a slaughterhouse waste compost. Revista Internacional de Contaminación Ambiental. 2004; 20(2): 53-58.

Farzadkia M, Salehi S, Ameri A, Joneidy Jafari A, Nabizadeh R. Study on the Quality and Comparing of the Compost Produced by Khomain and Tehran Compost Factories. Iran. J. Health & Environ 2009; 3: 160-169.

Schulze K. F. Rate of Oxygen Consumption and Respiratory Rate Quotients during the Aerobic Composting of Synthetic Garbage. Compost Science 1960; 36(1): 136-139.


  • There are currently no refbacks.