Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Register
  • Login

Urology Journal

  • Home
  • Instant Online
    • Instant 2025
    • Instant 2024
    • Instant 2023
    • Instant 2022
    • Instant 2021
    • Instant 2020
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Submissions
  • Author Guidelines
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 22 No. 02 (2025): March-April 2025
  4. ORIGINAL PAPER (ENDOUROLOGY AND STONE DISEASE)

Vol. 22 No. 02 (2025)

March 2025

Ultra-mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (UM-PCNL) with a Semi-rigid Ureteroscope in Preschool Children: An Innovative Experience in Southern Iran

  • Mohammad Mehdi Hosseini
  • Ali Eslahi
  • Fatemeh Masjedi
  • Sohail Ahmed
  • Seyed Sajjad Tabei
  • Mohammad Reza Abedini

Urology Journal, Vol. 22 No. 02 (2025), 2 March 2025 , Page 68-74
https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v21i.8084 Published: 2025-03-02

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • References
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Purpose: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has undergone extensive modification to reduce complications. One of the recent advances in minimally invasive procedures is the advent of ultra-mini PCNL (UM-PCNL), which provides miniaturized access to the kidney. However, the specific instruments applied in UM-PCNL may not be found in centers with limited resources. This study evaluated the safety, feasibility, results, and short-term complication rates of performing UM-PCNL using a semi-rigid ureteroscope in preschool children.
Materials and Methods: Between September 2013 and September 2021, a total of 68 patients, including 42 boys and 26 girls with a mean age of 3.2 ± 2.4 years, underwent UM-PCNL with a 4.5French tip ureteroscope instead of an ultra-mini nephroscope in children aged less than 7 years old. The procedure was done under general anesthesia in the prone position. The nephrostomy tract was dilated to 12F. Stones were fragmented using a pneumatic lithotripter. Irrigation was done with normal saline.
Results: The early stone-free rate (SFR) was 91%, and the short-term total SFR was 97%. No statistically significant difference was found in pre-operative and post-operative Hb, BUN, Cr, Na+, and K+. Fever (11 patients) and ileus (5 patients) constituted the majority of complications, and only one patient required a blood transfusion. None of the cases undergoing UM-PCNL with this method required a re-do PCNL.
Conclusion: Our experience shows that with sufficient experience in handling semi-rigid ureteroscopes, urologists practicing in centers with limited resources could perform UM-PCNL with relatively favorable outcomes.

Keywords:
  • Ultra-mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
  • Renal Calculi
  • Ureteroscope
  • Children
  • 8084/pdf

How to Cite

Hosseini, M. M., Eslahi, A., Masjedi, F., Ahmed, S., Tabei, S. S., & Abedini, M. R. (2025). Ultra-mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (UM-PCNL) with a Semi-rigid Ureteroscope in Preschool Children: An Innovative Experience in Southern Iran. Urology Journal, 22(02), 68–74. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v21i.8084
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

References

Mishra DK, Bhatt S, Palaniappan S, et al. Mini versus ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in a paediatric population. Asian J Urol. 2022; 9:75-80.

Schwarz RD, Dwyer NT. Pediatric kidney stones: long-term outcomes. Urology. 2006; 67:812-6.

Sung YM, Choo SW, Jeon SS, Shin SW, Park KB, Do YS. The "mini-perc" technique of percutaneous nephrolithotomy with a 14-Fr peel-away sheath: 3-year results in 72 patients. Korean J Radiol. 2006; 7:50-6.

Tekgül S, Stein R, Bogaert G, et al. European Association of Urology and European Society for Paediatric Urology Guidelines on Paediatric Urinary Stone Disease. Eur Urol Focus. 2022; 8:833-9.

Jones P, Bennett G, Aboumarzouk OM, Griffin S, Somani BK. Role of Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Techniques-Micro and Ultra-Mini PCNL (<15F) in the Pediatric Population: A Systematic Review. J Endourol. 2017; 31:816-24.

Haghighi R, Zeraati H, Ghorban Zade M. Ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) versus standard PCNL: A randomised clinical trial. Arab J Urol. 2017; 15:294-8.

Eslahi A, Ahmed F, Hosseini MM, et al. Minimal invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (Mini-PCNL) in children: Ultrasound versus fluoroscopic guidance. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2021; 93:173-7.

Eslahi A, Hosseini MM, Ahmed F, et al. Totally ultrasound-guided minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children: Is it safe? Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2022; 19:68-72.

Helal M, Black T, Lockhart J, Figueroa TE. The Hickman peel-away sheath: alternative for pediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 1997; 11:171-2.

Li X, He Z, Wu K, et al. Chinese minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: the Guangzhou experience. J Endourol. 2009; 23:1693-7.

Desai MR, Sharma R, Mishra S, Sabnis RB, Stief C, Bader M. Single-step percutaneous nephrolithotomy (microperc): the initial clinical report. J Urol. 2011; 186:140-5.

Scales CD, Jr., Smith AC, Hanley JM, Saigal CS. Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Eur Urol. 2012; 62:160-5.

Albala DM, Assimos DG, Clayman RV, et al. Lower pole I: a prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis-initial results. J Urol. 2001; 166:2072-80.

Srisubat A, Potisat S, Lojanapiwat B, Setthawong V, Laopaiboon M. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014:Cd007044.

Sabnis RB, Jagtap J, Mishra S, Desai M. Treating renal calculi 1-2 cm in diameter with minipercutaneous or retrograde intrarenal surgery: a prospective comparative study. BJU Int. 2012; 110:E346-9.

Michel MS, Trojan L, Rassweiler JJ. Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol. 2007; 51:899-906; discussion

Tefekli A, Ali Karadag M, Tepeler K, et al. Classification of percutaneous nephrolithotomy complications using the modified clavien grading system: looking for a standard. Eur Urol. 2008; 53:184-90.

Bader MJ, Gratzke C, Seitz M, Sharma R, Stief CG, Desai M. The "all-seeing needle": initial results of an optical puncture system confirming access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol. 2011; 59:1054-9.

Jackman SV, Docimo SG, Cadeddu JA, Bishoff JT, Kavoussi LR, Jarrett TW. The "mini-perc" technique: a less invasive alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol. 1998; 16:371-4.

Preminger GM. Management of lower pole renal calculi: shock wave lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopy. Urol Res. 2006; 34:108-11.

Resorlu B, Oguz U, Resorlu EB, Oztuna D, Unsal A. The impact of pelvicaliceal anatomy on the success of retrograde intrarenal surgery in patients with lower pole renal stones. Urology. 2012; 79:61-6.

Monga M, Best S, Venkatesh R, et al. Durability of flexible ureteroscopes: a randomized, prospective study. J Urol. 2006; 176:137-41.

Sofimajidpour H, Zarei B, Rasouli MA, Hosseini M. Ultra-Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Stones Sized between 10-20 mm in Children Younger Than 8 Years Old. Urol J. 2020; 17:139-42.

Skolarikos A, de la Rosette J. Prevention and treatment of complications following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Curr Opin Urol. 2008; 18:229-34.

  • Abstract Viewed: 688 times
  • 8084/pdf Downloaded: 296 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors

Developed By

Open Journal Systems
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
Powered by OJSPlus