Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Register
  • Login

Urology Journal

  • Home
  • Instant Online
    • Instant 2022
    • Instant 2021
    • Instant 2020
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Submissions
  • Author Guidelines
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 19 No. 02 (2022): March-April 2022
  4. ORIGINAL PAPER (FEMALE UROLOGY)

ISSN: 1735-1308

March-April 2022
Vol. 19 No. 02 (2022)

Comparing Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy with Vaginal Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation in the Treatment of Vaginal Apical Prolapse; the First Randomized Clinical Trial: A pilot study

  • Azar Daneshpajooh
  • Hamid Pakmanesh
  • Samira Sohbati
  • Mahboubeh Mirzaei
  • Ehsan Zemanati
  • Tania Dehesh

Urology Journal, Vol. 19 No. 02 (2022), , Page 131-137
https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v19i.7039 Published 30 January 2022

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • References
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Purpose: To compare two methods of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSCP) and sacrospinous ligament fixation
(SSLF) in terms of efficacy and safety in the treatment of vaginal apical prolapse.
Materials and Methods: This prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted on 32 patients with symptomatic vaginal apical prolapse, referred to the female urology clinic of Kerman University, Iran, during 2018-2019. The patients were re-examined at 12 months after surgery. Objective success was recorded using Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) classification as primary outcome. The subjective success of the methods was determined by the quality-of-life parameters, based on Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7), Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20), and Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12) scores as secondary outcomes. Moreover, complications were recorded in both groups.
Results: The amount of intraoperative bleeding was significantly higher in the SSLF group, compared to the LSCP group (P = 0.01). Persistent pain was observed in two (12%) patients in the LSCP group and five (31%) patients in the SSLF group (P = 0.2). The decrease in the total PFIQ-7 score was in favor of the LSCP group but not statistically significant (p = 0.06). The LSCP group showed bigger improvement in vaginal (p = 0.04) and bowel (p = 0.03) scores. The results of the PISQ-12 and PFDI-20 questionnaires as well as POP-Q examination were not different in two groups.
Conclusion: Although the surgical methods of LSCP and SSLF can be equally effective in the treatment of apical
prolapse, LSCP appears to be superior to SSLF regarding less bleeding.

Keywords:
  • Pelvic organ prolapse; Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy; Vaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation; Vault prolapse
  • 7039/pdf

How to Cite

Daneshpajooh, A., Pakmanesh, H., Sohbati, S., Mirzaei, M., Zemanati, E., & Dehesh, T. (2022). Comparing Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy with Vaginal Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation in the Treatment of Vaginal Apical Prolapse; the First Randomized Clinical Trial: A pilot study. Urology Journal, 19(02), 131-137. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v19i.7039
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

References

(1) Sharifiaghdas, F., Daneshpajooh, A., Mirzaei, M.: Simultaneous treatment of anterior vaginal wall prolapse and stress urinary incontinence by using transobturator four arms polypropylene mesh. Korean J Urol, 56: 811, 2015

(2) Subak, L. L., Waetjen, L. E., van den Eeden, S. et al.: Cost of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the United States. Obstet Gynecol, 98: 646, 2001

(3) Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K. et al.: Surgery for women with anterior compartment prolapse. Cochrane Database of Systemic Reviews 2016, Issue 11.Art.No CD004014.

(4) Nygaard, I., Barber, M. D., Burgio, K. L. et al.: Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. JAMA, 300: 1311, 2008

(5) Swift, S., Woodman, P., O'Boyle, A. et al.: Pelvic Organ Support Study (POSST): the distribution, clinical definition, and epidemiologic condition of pelvic organ support defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 192: 795, 2005

(6) Abrams, P., Cardozo, L., Fall, M. et al.: The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn, 21: 167, 2002

(7) DeLancey, J. O.: The anatomy of the pelvic floor. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 6: 313, 1994

(8) Blandon, R. E., Bharucha, A. E., Melton, L. J., 3rd et al.: Risk factors for pelvic floor repair after hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol, 113: 601, 2009

(9) Mant, J., Painter, R., Vessey, M.: Epidemiology of genital prolapse: observations from the Oxford Family Planning Association Study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 104: 579, 1997

(10) Nezhat, C. H., Nezhat, F., Nezhat, C.: Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse. Obstet Gynecol, 84: 885, 1994

(11) Toozs-Hobson, P., Boos, K., Cardozo, L.: Management of vaginal vault prolapse. Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 105: 13, 1998

(12) Nichols, D. H.: Sacrospinous fixation for massive eversion of the vagina. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 142: 901, 1982

(13) Tseng, L. H., Chen, I., Chang, S. D. et al.: Modern role of sacrospinous ligament fixation for pelvic organ prolapse surgery--a systemic review. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol, 52: 311, 2013

(14) Cespedes, R. D.: Anterior approach bilateral sacrospinous ligament fixation for vaginal vault prolapse. Urology, 56: 70, 2000

(15) Winkler, H. A., Tomeszko, J. E., Sand, P. K.: Anterior sacrospinous vaginal vault suspension for prolapse. Obstet Gynecol, 95: 612, 2000

(16) Lane, F. E.: Repair of posthysterectomy vaginal-vault prolapse. Obstet Gynecol, 20: 72, 1962

(17) Weidner, A. C., Cundiff, G. W., Harris, R. L. et al.: Sacral osteomyelitis: an unusual complication of abdominal sacral colpopexy. Obstet Gynecol, 90: 689, 1997

(18) Blanchard, K. A., Vanlangendonck, R., Winters, J. C.: Recurrent pelvic floor defects after abdominal sacral colpopexy. J Urol, 175: 1010, 2006

(19) Lee, R. K., Mottrie, A., Payne, C. K. et al.: A review of the current status of laparoscopic and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. Eur Urol, 65: 1128, 2014

(20) Benson, J. T., Lucente, V., McClellan, E.: Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: a prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 175: 1418, 1996

(21) Maher, C. F., Qatawneh, A. M., Dwyer, P. L. et al.: Abdominal sacral colpopexy or vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: a prospective randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 190: 20, 2004

(22) Maher, C., Feiner, B., Baessler, K. et al.: Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: CD004014, 2013

(23) Coolen, A. W. M., van Oudheusden, A. M. J., Mol, B. W. J. et al.: Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy compared with open abdominal sacrocolpopexy for vault prolapse repair: a randomised controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J, 28: 1469, 2017

(24) Freeman, R. M., Pantazis, K., Thomson, A. et al.: A randomised controlled trial of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: LAS study. Int Urogynecol J, 24: 377, 2013

(25) Skoczylas, L. C., Turner, L. C., Wang, L. et al.: Changes in prolapse surgery trends relative to FDA notifications regarding vaginal mesh. Int Urogynecol J, 25: 471, 2014

(26) Marcickiewicz, J., Kjollesdal, M., Engh, M. E. et al.: Vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy and laparoscopic sacral colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 86: 733, 2007

  • Abstract Viewed: 0 times
  • 7039/pdf Downloaded: 0 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

In case of persistent problems in registration, primary uploading of a submission or uploading of a revision, please send us the submission files on the journal email at:

urologyjournal@sbmu.ac.ir

and please attach the screenshot of the error or problem you encountered in uploading.

 

Make a Submission

          Journal Research in Urology

Information
  • For Readers
  • For Authors
Keywords
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
The template of this website is designed by Sinaweb