Urology Journal

ISSN: 1735-1308

Instant 2021

Confusion in Gonadal Dysgenesis Terminology Persisting beyond Chicago Consensus Statement on Disorders of Sexual Development Gonadal dysgenesis subtypes nomenclature

Urology Journal, , 23 February 2021 , Page 6933
https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v18i.6933

Abstract

Abstract:


The terminology of gonadal dysgenesis conditions is considerably abstruse and variable. Despite some efforts in the 2006 Chicago Consensus Statement on DSD , it is still difficult to assign a category and name for some distinct conditions in this document. The rest of the literature has used redundant and variable words, e.g. partial, pure, and complete gonadal dysgenesis suffering equivocality and redundancy, aggravating this inconclusiveness. We attempted to highlight this problem and propose an easier terminology blueprint.


 


Abstract:


The terminology of gonadal dysgenesis conditions is considerably abstruse and variable. Despite some efforts in the 2006 Chicago Consensus Statement on DSD , it is still difficult to assign a category and name for some distinct conditions in this document. The rest of the literature has used redundant and variable words, e.g. partial, pure, and complete gonadal dysgenesis suffering equivocality and redundancy, aggravating this inconclusiveness. We attempted to highlight this problem and propose an easier terminology blueprint.


 


 

Keywords:
  • Sexual development disorder, gonad, dysgenesis, consensus, terminology, sex

How to Cite

Ghahestani, S. M., & Karimi, S. (2021). Confusion in Gonadal Dysgenesis Terminology Persisting beyond Chicago Consensus Statement on Disorders of Sexual Development: Gonadal dysgenesis subtypes nomenclature. Urology Journal, 18, 6933. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v18i.6933

References

1. Bagci G, Bisgin A, Karauzum SB, Trak B, Luleci G. Complete gonadal dysgenesis 46, XY (Swyer syndrome) in two sisters and their mother's maternal aunt with a female phenotype. Fertility and sterility. 2011;95(5):1786. e1-. e3.
2. Rocha VBC, Guerra-Júnior G, Marques-de-Faria AP, de Mello MP, Maciel-Guerra AT. Complete gonadal dysgenesis in clinical practice: the 46, XY karyotype accounts for more than one third of cases. Fertility and sterility. 2011;96(6):1431-4.
3. Hughes IA, Houk C, Ahmed SF, Lee PA, Society LWPE. Consensus statement on management of intersex disorders. Journal of pediatric urology. 2006;2(3):148-62.
4. Öcal G, Berberoğlu M, Şıklar Z, Ruhi HI, Tükün A, Çamtosun E, et al. The clinical and genetic heterogeneity of mixed gonadal dysgenesis: does “disorders of sexual development (DSD)” classification based on new Chicago consensus cover all sex chromosome DSD? European journal of pediatrics. 2012;171(10):1497-502.
  • Abstract Viewed: 0 times
  • Just Accepted/6933 Downloaded: 0 times

Download Statastics

In case of persistent problems in registration, primary uploading of a submission or uploading of a revision, please send us the submission files on the journal email at:

urologyjournal@sbmu.ac.ir

and please attach the screenshot of the error or problem you encountered in uploading.

 

Make a Submission
Information
Keywords