Novel Technique in Performing Standard Transperineal Template Prostate Biopsies Under Local Anaesthetic
Purpose: Transperineal template prostate biopsies (TPTPB) are now increasingly commonly performed for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. TPTPB are traditionally performed under general anaesthetic. However, this poses a significant strain on hospital theatre capacity. As such, local anaesthetic (LA) TPTPB are becoming more popular. We describe a novel technique in performing the standard TPTPB under LA in the outpatient setting.
Materials and Methods: Between February 2019- February 2021, 254 consecutive men (median age 69; range: 44-80 years) with a median PSA of 8.7 ng/ml (range: 2.2-76) underwent L/A TPTPB using our novel technique. This is whereby 50mls of 1% prilocaine was injected partially around the perineal skin and partially deep bilateral periprostatic areas. Multiple simultaneous prostate biopsies were then taken with the standard template grid and stepper.
Results: A total of 250/254 (98.4%) men underwent successful L/A TPTPB with a median visual analogue pain score of 4 (range: 2-8). The median prostate volume was 49cc (range: 14-240cc). The median number of cores taken were 18 (range: 14-24). A total of 163/250 men (65.2%) had a positive histology for prostate cancer with a median of 5 cores being involved with prostate cancer (range: 1-18). In addition, 101/163 men (62.0%) diagnosed with prostate cancer had either Gleason score 3+4=7 or greater. None experienced urosepsis and only 2/250 men (0.8%) had temporary urinary retention.
Conclusion: Our novel LA technique in performing the standard TPTPB is safe, feasible and well tolerated and associated with a high rate of prostate cancer detection.
- anaesthetic; biopsy; local; perineum; prilocaine; prostate
How to Cite
2. Han M, Chang D, Kim C, et al. Geometric evaluation of systematic transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. J Urol. 2012; 188: 2404-9.
3. Grummet JP, Weerakoon M, Huang S, et al. Sepsis and 'superbugs': should we favour the transperineal over the transrectal approach for prostate biopsy? BJU Int. 2014; 114: 384-8.
4. Anastasiadis E, van der Meulen J, Emberton M. Hospital admissions after transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate in men diagnosed with prostate cancer: a database analysis in England. Int J Urol. 2015; 22: 181-6.
5. Chang DT, Challacombe B, Lawrentschuk N. Transperineal biopsy of the prostate--is this the future? Nat Rev Urol. 2013; 10: 690-702.
6. Nafie S, Mellon JK, Dormer JP, Khan MA. The role of transperineal template prostate biopsies in prostate cancer diagnosis in biopsy naive men with PSA less than 20 ng/ml. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2014; 17: 170-3.
7. Nafie S, Pal RP, Dormer JP, Khan MA. Transperineal template prostate biopsies in men with raised PSA despite two previous sets of negative TRUS-guided prostate biopsies. World J Urol. 2014; 32: 971-5.
8. Brown LC, Ahmed HU, Faria R, et al. Multiparametric MRI to improve detection of prostate cancer compared with transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy alone: the PROMIS study. Health Technol Assess. 2018; 22: 1-176.
9. Hanna N, Wszolek MF, Mojtahed A, et al. Multiparametric MRI/Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy Improves but Does Not Replace Standard Template Biopsy for the Detection of Prostate Cancer. J Urol. 2019; 202: 944-51.
10. Meyer AR, Joice GA, Schwen ZR et al. Initial Experience Performing In-office Ultrasound-guided Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Under Local Anesthesia Using the PrecisionPoint Transperineal Access System. Urology. 2018; 115: 8-13.
11. Kum F, Elhage O, Maliyil J et al. Initial outcomes of local anaesthetic freehand transperineal biopsies in the outpatient setting. BJU Int. 2020; 125: 244-52.
12. Thurtle D, Starling L, Leonard K, Stone T, Gnanapragasam VJ. Improving the safety and tolerability of local anaesthetic outpatient transperineal prostate biopsies: A pilot study of the CAMbridge PROstate Biopsy (CAMPROBE) method. J Clin Urol. 2018; 11: 192-9.
13. Dundee PE, Grummet JP, Murphy DG. Transperineal prostate biopsy: template-guided or freehand? BJU Int. 2015; 115: 681-3.
- Abstract Viewed: 0 times
- Just Accepted/6855 Downloaded: 0 times