Investigating the Outcome of Surgery in Patients with Penile Fracture Outcome of surgery in patients with penile fractures
Urology Journal,
Vol. 19 No. 02 (2022),
5 May 2022
,
Page 144-147
https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v19i02.6347
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of study was to investigate the outcome of surgery in patients with penile fracture in Al-Zahra hospital.
Materials and Methods: This cross sectional study was conducted on 187 patients with penile fracture underwent surgery in Al-Zahra hospital during 2016- 2020. Data such as penile fracture causes, erectile dysfunction, time of surgery after penile fracture, degree of penile curvature and etc were extracted from medical records.
Results: The most common reason of penile fracture in these patients was manipulation and trauma with frequency 70 (37.4%) and 69 patients (36.9%), respectively. Lower urinary tract symptom, urinary tract injury, penile curvature, penile nodule and erectile dysfunction were observed in 1 (0.54 %), 2(1.06 %), 76 (40.64%), 75 (40.1%), 43 (23%) patients, respectively. Mild and moderate erectile dysfunction was seen in 38 (88.3%) and 5 (11.62%) patients, respectively. There was a significant relationship between erectile dysfunction with the degree of penile curvature, surgical time and size of defect (P < .01). Furthermore, significant relation was observed between penile nodules and suture type (P = .000).
Conclusion: According to findings, erectile dysfunction was observed in 23 % of patients; however most of these patients had mild erectile dysfunction. Moreover, erectile dysfunction was influenced by penile curvature, surgical time and size of defect. Therefore, early surgery and special attention to patients with severe penile curvature are proposed for prevention of erectile dysfunction in these patients.
- erectile dysfunction; penile curvature; penile fracture; penile nodule
How to Cite
References
Kominsky H, Beebe S, Nayan Shah N, et al. Surgical reconstruction for penile fracture: a systematic review. Sexual Med J 2019; 2: 1-9.
Muentener M. Long term experience with surgical and conservative treatment of penile fracture. J Urol 2004; 172:576-589.
Shafi H, Ramaji A, Kasaeeian A, et al. Report of 84 cases of penile Fracture in Beheshti Hospital center. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci 2005; 15:37-43
Ateyah A, Mostafa T, Nasser TA, et al. Penile fracture: surgical repair and late effects on erectile function. J Sex Med 2008; 5:1496–502.
Beilan JA, Wallen JJ, Baumgarten AS, et al. Intralesional injection of collagenase Clostridium histolyticum may increase the risk of late-onset penile fracture. Sex Med Rev 2018; 6:272–8.
Mydlo JH. Surgeon experience with penile fracture. J Urol 2001; 166: 526–8.
Jack G, Garraway I, Reznichek, R. Current Treatment Options for Penile Fractures. Rev Urol 2004; 6(3):114-20.
Zargooshi J. Penile fracture in Kermanshah, Iran: report of 172 cases. J Urol 2000;164: 364-366.
Karadeniz T, Topsakal M. Penile fracture: differential diagnosis, management and outcome. British J Urol 1996; 77:279–81.
Hassali MA, Nouri AI, Hamzah AA, et al. Role of penile doppler as a diagnostic tool in penile fracture. J Med Ultrasound 2018; 26:48–51.
Klein FA, Smith V, Miller N. Penile fracture: diagnosis and management. J Trauma. 1985;25:1090- 1092.
Mydlo, J. Surgeon experience with penile fracture. J Urol 2001; 166: 526.
Zargooshi, J. Penile fracture in Kermanshah, Iran: the longterm results of surgical treatment. BJU Int 2002; 89: 890-97.
Kochakarn, W, Viseshsindh, V, Muangman, V. Penile fracture: long-term outcome of treatment. J MedAssoc Thai 2002; 85: 179-182
Bolat M. Effects of penile fracture and its surgical treatment on psychosocial and sexual function. Int J Impotence Res 2017; 29; 244–49.
Reise L. Mechanisms Predisposing Penile Fracture and Long-Term Outcomes on Erectile and Voiding Functions. Advances in Urol 2014; 1-9.
Ibrahiem El, El-Tholoth H, Mohsen T. Ahmed El-Assmy. Penile Fracture: Long-term
Outcome of Immediate Surgical Intervention. Urology 2019; 75: 108–111.
Jack G, Garraway I, Reznichek R, Rajfer J. Current Treatment Options for Penile Fractures. Reviews Urol 2004; 6: 114-120.
Nason G. Barry B. McGuire. Sexual function outcomes following fracture of the penis. Cite as: Can Urol Assoc J 2013;7: 252-7.
O’Leary MP, Fowler FJ, Lenderking WR. A brief male sexual function inventory in urology. Urology 1995;46: 697-706.
Assmy A, Tholoth HS, Mohsen T. Does timing of presentation of penile fracture affect outcome of surgical intervention? Urology 2011; 77:1388-91.
Ibrahiem HI, Tholoth HS, Mohsen T. Penile fracture: long-term outcome of immediate surgical intervention. Urology 2010;75:108-11.
Garca- Gomez B, Romero J, Villacampa F, et al. Early treatment of penile fractures: our experience. Arch Esp Urol 2012; 65:684-8.
Koifman L, Barros R, Jonior RA. Penile fracture: diagnosis, treatment and outcomes of 150 patients. Urology 2010; 76: 1488-92.
Assmy El. Risk Factors of Erectile Dysfunction and Penile Vascular Changes After Surgical Repair of Penile Fracture. Int J Impot Res 2012; 24: 20-5.
Joe A. Management of Erectile Dysfunction. Am Fam Physician 2010 ;81(3):305-12
Ahmad A. Majzoub, Onder Canguven, and Talib A. Raidh. Alteration in the etiology of penile fracture in the Middle East and Central Asia regions in the last decade; a literature review. Urol Ann 2015; 7: 284–288.
Burri A, Hartmut Porst. The relationship between penile deformity, age, psychological bother, and erectile dysfunction in a sample of men with Peyronie’s Disease. Sexual Med J 2018; 30:171–78.
Usta M. Relationship Between the Severity of Penile Curvature and the Presence of Comorbidities in Men With Peyronie's Disease. J urol 2004; 177-181.
Levine L, Greenfield J, Estrada C. Erectile Dysfunction Following Surgical Correction of Peyronie's Disease and a Pilot Study of the Use of Sildenafil Citrate Rehabilitation for Postoperative Erectile Dysfunction. J Sex Med 2005; 2: 241-7.
Kati B. Penile fracture and investigation of early surgical repair effects on erectile dysfunction. Urologia 2019; 86: 207-10.
Atiyeh A. Mostafa T. Penile Fracture: Surgical Repair and Late Effects on Erectile Function. Sex Med 2008;5:1496–150.
Regan T. Comparison of Poliglecaprone-25 and Polyglactin-910 in Cutaneous Surgery. Dermatol Surg 2013; 39:1340–44.
Niessen FB, Spauwen PH, Kon M. The role of suture material in hypertrophic scar formation: Monocryl vs Vicryl-rapid. Ann Plast Surg 2000; 39:254–60.
- Abstract Viewed: 52 times
- 6347/pdf Downloaded: 39 times