Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Register
  • Login

Urology Journal

  • Home
  • Instant Online
    • Instant 2026
    • Instant 2023
    • Instant 2021
    • Instant 2020
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Submissions
  • Author Guidelines
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Instant 2019&2020
  4. LETTER

January 2020

Current Trends in Hypospadias Repair. Where are we Standing?

  • Parisa Saeedi Sharifabad
  • Vahid Poudineh
  • Mehran Hiradfar
  • Ahmad Mohammadipour
  • Reza Shojaeian

Urology Journal, , 1 January 2020 , Page 6081
https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v16i7.6081 Published: 2020-08-18

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • References
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Purpose: Although several surgical approaches are suggested for hypospadias reconstruction but there is not a consensus on the best surgical method of hypospadias repair. This is a survey about technique of choice in treatment of various types of hypospadias.

Method and materials: We asked about preferred method of treatment for three different hypospadias scenarios. 170 surgeons completed the questionnaire and enrolled in this study.

Results: 51 general urologists, 61 pediatric surgeon, 16 plastic surgeons and 42 pediatric urologists joined the survey. Preferred method of surgery for a distal hypospadias was TIP in 53.5%. TIP was offered by 39.4% , Two stage Urethroplasty in 24.7% and Island On lay Flap in 21.2% to repair a proximal hypospadias without cordee. Two-stage Bracka or Durham Smith were common surgical options in proximal hypospadias surgery with cordee.

Conclusion: A growing trend was detected on TIP repair of distal and proximal hypospadias without cordee.

Keywords:
  • Hypospadias
  • surgery
  • pediatrics
  • Just Accepted/6081

How to Cite

Saeedi Sharifabad, P., Poudineh, V., Hiradfar, M., Mohammadipour, A., & Shojaeian, R. (2020). Current Trends in Hypospadias Repair. Where are we Standing?. Urology Journal, 16(7), 6081. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v16i7.6081
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

References

Horowitz M, Salzhauer E. The ‘learning curve’in hypospadias surgery. BJU international. 2006;97(3):593-6.

Macedo Jr A, Rondon A, Ortiz V. Hypospadias. Current opinion in urology. 2012;22(6):447-52.

Lambert SM, Snyder HM, Canning DA. The history of hypospadias and hypospadias repairs. Urology. 2011;77(6):1277-83.

Hadidi AT. History of hypospadias: Lost in translation. Journal of pediatric surgery. 2017;52(2):211-7.

Snodgrass W, Macedo A, Hoebeke P, Mouriquand PD. Hypospadias dilemmas: a round table. Journal of Pediatric Urology. 2011;7(2):145-57.

Springer A, Krois W, Horcher E. Trends in hypospadias surgery: results of a worldwide survey. European urology. 2011;60(6):1184-9.

Manzoni G, Bracka A, Palminteri E, Marrocco G. Hypospadias surgery: when, what and by whom? BJU international. 2004;94(8):1188-95.

Timmons M. The UK primary hypospadias surgery audit 2006–2007. Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery. 2010;63(8):1349-52.

Snodgrass WT, Bush N, Cost N. Tubularized incised plate hypospadias repair for distal hypospadias. Journal of Pediatric Urology. 2010;6(4):408-13.

Cook A, Khoury AE, Neville C, Bagli DJ, Farhat WA, Salle JLP. A multicenter evaluation of technical preferences for primary hypospadias repair. The Journal of urology. 2005;174(6):2354-7.

Barbagli G, Perovic S, Djinovic R, Sansalone S, Lazzeri M. Retrospective descriptive analysis of 1,176 patients with failed hypospadias repair. The Journal of urology. 2010;183(1):207-11.

Bhandarkar K, Garriboli M. Repair of Distal Hypospadias: Cosmetic or Reconstructive? UROLOGY. 2019.

Misra D, Elbourne C, Vareli A, Banerjee D, Joshi A, Friedmacher F, et al. Challenges in managing proximal hypospadias: A 17-year single-center experience. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2019;54(10):2125-9.

  • Abstract Viewed: 251 times
  • Just Accepted/6081 Downloaded: 199 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors

Developed By

Open Journal Systems
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
Powered by OJSPlus