Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Register
  • Login

Urology Journal

  • Home
  • Instant Online
    • Instant 2025
    • Instant 2024
    • Instant 2023
    • Instant 2022
    • Instant 2021
    • Instant 2020
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Submissions
  • Author Guidelines
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 15 No. 5 (2018): September-October2018
  4. CASE REPORT

Vol. 15 No. 5 (2018)

September 2018

Kimura’s Disease Presenting As Scrotal Mass: A Difficult Diagnosis

  • Deng Piao Xie
  • Yan Fang Xu
  • Ming Quan Li

Urology Journal, Vol. 15 No. 5 (2018), 26 September 2018 , Page 295-296
https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v15i5.4050 Published: 2018-09-26

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • References
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Herein we report a case of Kimura’s disease with unusual manifestations. A 46-year- old Chinese man presented with mass in scrotum which gradually increased in size for approximately 7 years. A computerized tomographic scan of abdomen revealed a soft-tissue density shadow in scrotum and enlargement of lymph nodes in groin and retroperitoneum. The scrotal mass was excised and the biopsy specimen revealed angiolymphoid hyperplasia with infiltration of eosinophils. In conclusion, clinical doctors should pay attention that the patient with eosinophilia and scrotal mass could be indicative for Kimura’s disease.
  • PDF

How to Cite

Xie, D. P., Xu, Y. F., & Li, M. Q. (2018). Kimura’s Disease Presenting As Scrotal Mass: A Difficult Diagnosis. Urology Journal, 15(5), 295–296. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v15i5.4050
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

References

Kawada A. Kimura's disease: manifestation of the disease and its differential diagnosis. Hautarzt,1976;27:309-17.

Seregard S. Angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia should not be confused with Kimura’s disease. Acta Ophthalmol Scand

; 79: 91–93.

Kung I T M, Gibson J B, Bannatyne P M. Kimura's Disease: A Clinico-Pathological Study Of 21 Cases And Its Distinction

From Angiolymphoid Hyperplasia With Eosinophils. Pathology, 1984, 16:39.

Motoi M, Wahid S, Horie Y,Akagi T. Kimura's disease:clinical, histologic and immunohistochemicalstudies. Acta MedOkayama 1992;46:449-55.

R P S Punia, R Aulakh, S Garg. Kimura’s disease: clinicopathological study of eight cases. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology, 2013, 127, 170–4.

  • Abstract Viewed: 782 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 318 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors

Developed By

Open Journal Systems
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
Powered by OJSPlus