Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Register
  • Login

Urology Journal

  • Home
  • Instant Online
    • Instant 2025
    • Instant 2024
    • Instant 2023
    • Instant 2022
    • Instant 2021
    • Instant 2020
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Submissions
  • Author Guidelines
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 16 No. 1 (2019): January-February2019
  4. ORIGINAL PAPER (PEDIATRIC UROLOGY)

Vol. 16 No. 1 (2019)

February 2019

Management of Congenital Urethral Strictures In Infants. Case Series

  • Dalia Gobbi
  • Francesco Fascetti Leon
  • Michele Gnech
  • Marina Andreetta
  • Paola Midrio
  • Piergiorgio Gamba
  • Marco Castagnetti

Urology Journal, Vol. 16 No. 1 (2019), 21 February 2019 , Page 67-71
https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v16i1.4045 Published: 2019-02-21

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Purpose: Infra-vesical obstruction is uncommon in infants and generally due to urethral valves. Congenital urethral strictures (CUS), instead, defined as a concentric narrowing of the urethral lumen, are exceedingly rare in infants.

Materials and Methods: We reviewed our experience with 7 patients treated at our institution for CUS <age of 1-year. The study is a retrospective review of 7 patients treated for CUS diagnosed <age 1-year during a 10-year period.

Result: In a single patient, the urethral stricture was an isolated condition, 3 had a Prune Belly Syndrome (PBS) and the remaining 3 had an Ano-Rectal Malformation (ARM). Four patients had upper tract dilatation detected on prenatal ultrasound. Five patients had upper tract dilatation on postnatal ultrasound. Five patients had impaired renal function at diagnosis and 3 required renal transplantation eventually. On micturating cystourethrography, all strictures were located in the anterior urethra and 4 cases had associated vesicoureteral reflux. In all cases, but one urinating via a patent urachus, initial management included insertion of a supra-pubic catheter. Subsequently, the CUS could be treated by dilatation or endoscopic incision in the 3 patients with Prune belly syndrome, whereas 3 of the remaining 4 required a formal urethroplasty.

Conclusion: Diagnosis and treatment of CUS in infants and children remain difficult to standardize. At presentation, urinary diversion is key to avoid progressive renal damage in infants that can already have an impaired renal function. Anterior strictures in patients with PBS are likely to be fixed with progressive dilatation. In other patients, instead, urethroplasty should be considered. A formal vesicostomy or, if possible, an urethrostomy can allow temporizing final surgery. A major problem we experienced in the treatment of CUS is that the small endoscopic
instruments required in this age group make urethral instrumentation more difficult and less effective than in older
children and adults.

  • PDF

How to Cite

Gobbi, D., Fascetti Leon, F., Gnech, M., Andreetta, M., Midrio, P., Gamba, P., & Castagnetti, M. (2019). Management of Congenital Urethral Strictures In Infants. Case Series. Urology Journal, 16(1), 67–71. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v16i1.4045
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX
  • Abstract Viewed: 1092 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 487 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors

Developed By

Open Journal Systems
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
Powered by OJSPlus