Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Register
  • Login

Urology Journal

  • Home
  • Instant Online
    • Instant 2026
    • Instant 2023
    • Instant 2021
    • Instant 2020
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Submissions
  • Author Guidelines
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 12 No. 1 (2015): January-February 2015
  4. ORIGINAL PAPER(UROLOGICAL ONCOLOGY)

Vol. 12 No. 1 (2015)

February 2015

Novel Approach for Pain Control in Patients Undergoing Prostate Biopsy: Iliohypogastric Nerve Block with or without Topical Application of Prilocaine-Lidocaine: A Randomized Controlled Trial

  • Fatih Hizli
  • Guldeniz Argun
  • Fatih Ozkul
  • Oguz Guven
  • Ali Ihsan Arik
  • Sinan Basay
  • Aydin Kosus
  • Halil Gunaydin
  • Halil Basar

Urology Journal, Vol. 12 No. 1 (2015), 22 February 2015 , Page 2014-2019
https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v12i1.2689 Published: 2015-02-22

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the efficacy of a novel anesthetic technique called iliohypogastric nerve block (INB) for pain control in patients undergoing prostate biopsy.

Materials and Methods: A total of 59 consecutive patients who underwent transrectal ultrasound guided prostates biopsies were included in the study. Patients were randomized into four groups: (1) control, no method of anesthesia was administered, (2) intrarectal prilocaine-lidocaine cream application, (3) INB and (4) INB + intrarectal prilocaine-lidocaine cream application (combined group). Patients were asked to use a scale of 0-10 in a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) questionnaire about pain during probe insertion (VAS 1) and prostate biopsy (VAS 2).

Results: The mean VAS 1 and VAS 2 scores were 0.7 and 4.9 for controls, 0.5 and 1.8 for INB, 0.5 and 2.6 for the intrarectal cream group, and 0.4 and 1.8 for the combined group. The mean VAS 1 scores were not different between groups. However, the mean VAS 2 scores were significantly lower in INB, prilocaine-lidocaine cream and combined groups compared to the control group (P < .001). In addition, the INB group had significantly lower VAS 2 scores compared to the cream application group (P = .03). On the other hand, there was no difference between the INB and combined groups (P = .8).

Conclusion: Any form of anesthesia was superior to none. However, INB alone seemed to be superior to prilocaine-lidocaine cream application in patients undergoing prostate biopsy. Addition of prilocaine-lidocaine cream application to INB may not provide better analgesia.

 

  • PDF

How to Cite

Hizli, F., Argun, G., Ozkul, F., Guven, O., Arik, A. I., Basay, S., … Basar, H. (2015). Novel Approach for Pain Control in Patients Undergoing Prostate Biopsy: Iliohypogastric Nerve Block with or without Topical Application of Prilocaine-Lidocaine: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Urology Journal, 12(1), 2014–2019. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v12i1.2689
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX
  • Abstract Viewed: 460 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 393 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors

Developed By

Open Journal Systems
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
Powered by OJSPlus