Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Register
  • Login

Urology Journal

  • Home
  • Instant Online
    • Instant 2026
    • Instant 2023
    • Instant 2021
    • Instant 2020
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Submissions
  • Author Guidelines
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 10 No. 1 (2013): Winter
  4. ORIGINAL PAPER (ENDOUROLOGY AND STONE DISEASE)

Vol. 10 No. 1 (2013)

Esfand 2013

General Versus Spinal Anesthesia in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

  • Sadrollah Mehrabi
  • Ali Mousavi Zadeh
  • Mehdi Akbartabar Toori
  • Farhad Mehrabi

Urology Journal, Vol. 10 No. 1 (2013), 17 Esfand 2013 , Page 756-761
https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v10i1.1968 Published: 2013-03-17

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare efficacy and complications of spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective randomized study, 110 patients were randomly assigned into two groups for PCNL; group 1 (n = 52) underwent general anesthesia and group 2 (n = 58) received spinal anesthesia. In group 1, PCNL was performed using standard technique under general anesthesia. In group 2, spinal anesthesia was done by injecting bupivacaine and fentanyl in spinal space L4 in sitting position. Thereafter, a urethral catheter was placed in lithotomy position, head of the bed was tilted down for 5 to 10 minutes, and the level of anesthesia was checked. Then, PCNL was done by standard technique. Complications were recorded and analyzed by SPSS software using Chi-Square and Student’s t tests. RESULTS: Mean stone size in groups 1 and 2 was 34.2 ± 9.8 mm and 31.3 ± 7.9 mm, respectively. Intra-operative hypotension and postoperative headache and low back pain were more in spinal group than the general group with a significant difference (P < .05). No neurologic complication was observed in both groups. Need to narcotic medications on the day of operation in groups 1 and 2 was 12.4 ± 3.1 mg and 7.8 ± 2.3 mg of morphine sulphate, respectively (P = .03). The cost of anesthetic drugs was 23 ± 3.7 US $ and 4.5 ± 1.3 US $ in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = .001). CONCLUSION: Spinal anesthesia with combined bupivacaine and fentanyl is a safe, effective, and cost-effective method for performing PCNL in adult patients.
  • PDF

How to Cite

Mehrabi, S., Mousavi Zadeh, A., Akbartabar Toori, M., & Mehrabi, F. (2013). General Versus Spinal Anesthesia in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. Urology Journal, 10(1), 756–761. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v10i1.1968
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX
  • Abstract Viewed: 546 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 860 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors

Developed By

Open Journal Systems
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
Powered by OJSPlus