Institutional barriers to the development and construction of urban hospitals
Social Determinants of Health,
Vol. 9 (2023),
1 January 2023
,
Page 1-9
https://doi.org/10.22037/sdh.v9i1.39461
Abstract
Background: Increasing urban population and the need for accountability and citizen orientation have led decision makers to use the desired methods in the area of urban management. This article identified the barriers to development and construction of hospitals in metropolitan of Isfahan.
Methods: This study was descriptive-correlational in terms of method. 376 people were studied. They were selected using stratified random sampling method. To data collection, a researcher-made questionnaire was used. It included 41 questions in two dimensions of urban and regional barriers and planning and management. The construct validity of the research variable structure was confirmed by exploratory factor analysis. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was also estimated to be higher than 0.7. Data analysis was performed using confirmatory factor analysis in AMOS-23.
Results: The indicators shown that the model for measuring institutional obstacles to achieve good urban governance is suitable. The results showed that planning and management and urban and regional variables as institutional barriers have a significant impact on the construction of the hospital and it shows that these structures have a direct impact on these barriers. Therefore, it can be said that the influence of planning and management variables was more than other dimensions.
Conclusion: Based on the observations can be shown that the policy makers should identify the obstacles facing the collaborative models and then provide a suitable platform for their organizations. In order to reduce planning and management obstacles, should be managed within the framework of plans and stakeholders should be involved in the decision-making process.
- Hospital Design and Construction
- Hospitals, Municipal
- Organization and Administration
How to Cite
References
Taghvaei M, Safarabadi A. Urban sustainable development and selected variables affecting it (case of study: the city of kermanshah). Urban Studies. 2013;3(6):1-22. https://www.sid.ir/paper/210326/en
Zyari S, Farhudi R, Porahmad A, Hataminegad H. Analysis of sustainable housing in Karaj City. Geography and Development, 2018;16(52):141-156. https://doi.org/10.22111/gdij.2018.4119
Salehi H, Amini Hosseini K, Fallah Tafti M. Development of location criteria for hospitals in seismic cities based on physical and social indicators. Seventh International Conference on Seismology and Earthquake Engineering;2012. https://civilica.com/doc/1132332/
Khosroabad M, Zayanderoody M, Shakibaee A. The Effect of Good Governance Indicators on Income Inequality Selected Countries Southwest Asia and the Countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Refahj. 2016;16(61):159-185. http://refahj.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-2569-en.html
Sepehrdoust H, Rajabi F, Barooti M. The Impact of Good Governance on Income Performance of Tax System. Quarterly Journal of Applied Theories of Economics. 2015;2(2):103-126. https://ecoj.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_4269.html?lang=en
Moreno Pires S, Fidélis T. Local sustainability indicators in Portugal: assessing implementation and use in governance contexts. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2015;86(1):289-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.002
Moretto L. Application of the “Urban Governance Index” to water service provisions: Between rhetoric and reality. Habitat International. 2015;49(1):435-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.06.004
Moradi M, Salmanpour A. The effect of good governance on income distribution in a selected group of Organization of Islamic Countries (OIC). Biquarterly Journal of Sociology of Social Institutions. 2018;4(10):33-59. https://doi.org/10.22080/ssi.2018.1734
Heshmatzadeh M, Haji Yousefi A, Talebi M. A Study of Obstacles to Good Governance in Iranian Political Culture, Contemporary Political Studies. Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies. 2017;23(8):1-24. https://politicalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_2630.html?lang=en
Kazemi H. Globalization and developmental states aspects of change and continuity of state’s role in development’s process. Political Quarterly. 2014;44(1):199-216. https://doi.org/10.22059/jpq.2014.51772
Ghasemi Y. The Relationship between State and Civil Society from an Historical Sociological Perspective. Journal of Social Sciences, 2011;7(2):97-103. https://doi.org/10.22067/jss.v0i0.15825
Attar A, Moinifar M. Investigation of administrative obstacles and legal obstacles to the implementation of the electronic municipality from the point of view of citizens and employees of Tehran Municipality, National Conference on Sustainable Architecture and Urban Development, Bukan;2013. https://civilica.com/doc/213708/
Goodarzi M, Firoozi M, Saeidi O. Investigating and Analyzing Urban Morphological Barriers Affecting Underdevelopment of Public Transport in Ahwaz. Geography and Environmental Planning. 2019;30(2):91-120. https://doi.org/10.22108/gep.2019.119532.1214
Pourezzat AA. Fundamentals of Government Administration, (Fundamentals of Public Administration, Tehran: Organization for the Study and Compilation of Humanities Books Samt publications, second edition;2010.
Zabihi MR. Arifian H, Yarahamdi M, Kamali Rad I. Governance and social responsibility (including the collection of articles in the field of public administration), Mashhad, Research Vice-Chancellor of Islamic Azad University, Mashhad Branch, Sokhon Gostar Publications;2010.
Ghalipour R. Good governance and a suitable example of the government. Tehran: Expediency Recognition Council, Strategic Research Center, Science Production Extension Office;2006.
Taghvai M, Safarabadi A. The role of urban management in achieving sustainable development of urban tourism in the city of kermanshah. Arid regions geographic studies. 2011;1(4):35-52. https://www.sid.ir/paper/190690/en
Nargesian A, Jamali G, Harati M, Azari H. Investigating the Relationship between Corruption and Trust Related to Transparency and Citizen Satisfaction. Journal of Public Administration, 2018;10(2):289-310. https://doi.org/10.22059/jipa.2018.255605.2250
- Abstract Viewed: 92 times
- PDF Downloaded: 66 times