Assessing the adherence to the current guidelines in the management of syncope patients
Social Determinants of Health,
Vol. 4 No. 3 (2018),
2 October 2018
,
Page 154-161
https://doi.org/10.22037/sdh.v4i3.17203
Abstract
Background: There exist gaps in the implementation of guideline-recommended treatments and interventions to manage syncope. The present study aimed to investigate the adherence to the current guideline for the diagnosis and management of syncope patients referred to a tertiary center.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out with the study group consisting of 324 consecutive patients, who were diagnosed with unexplained syncope with one or more attacks and were referred for head-up tilt table test (HUTT) between September 2009 and September 2011 to Tehran Heart Center. All the patients underwent a thorough evaluation, including a careful medical history and physical examination as well as a thorough history of all procedures performed before referral. The data collected was compared between patients with positive and negative HUTT results and also based on the referring physician, in order to assess the deviation from syncope guideline in their management. We compared the selected groups using a chi-square test for categorical variables and student t-test or analysis of variance (ANOVA) for continuous variables where appropriate.
Results: A total of 324 patients with a Mean (SD) age of 41.04 (17.74) years were enrolled in the study (158 patients, i.e. 48.8%, were male). HUTT was positive in 181 (55.8%) patients. Brain computed tomography scan and coronary angiography were performed more in the initial assessment of the patients with a negative HUTT compared with patients with negative HUTT (P=0.001 and P=0.01, respectively). Significantly higher rates of brain MRI (P=0.01), brain imaging (P=0.03), and electroencephalography (P=0.002) were observed among the neurologists' referrals while echocardiography (P<0.001), exercise tolerance test (P=0.001), electrocardiogram Holter monitoring (P<0.001), and coronary angiography (P=0.02) were significantly more performed in patients referred by a cardiologist.
Conclusion: We observed a noticeable deviation from the current guideline for the management of syncope although the patients underwent expensive tests with little benefit.
- Coronary Angiography
- Exercise Test
- Physical Examination
- Syncope
- Tilt-Table Test
How to Cite
References
Ruiter JH, Barrett M. Permanent cardiac pacing for neurocardiogenic syncope. Neth Heart J. 2008;16(Suppl 1):S15-9.
Alboni P, Brignole M, Menozzi C, Raviele A, Del Rosso A, Dinelli M, et al. Diagnostic value of history in patients with syncope with or without heart disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2001;37(7):1921-8.
Olde Nordkamp LRA, van Dijk N, Ganzeboom KS, Reitsma JB, Luitse JSK, Dekker LRC, et al. Syncope prevalence in the ED compared to general practice and population: a strong selection process. The American journal of emergency medicine. 2009;27(3):271-9.
Parry SW, Reeve P, Lawson J, Shaw FE, Davison J, Norton M, et al. The Newcastle protocols 2008: an update on head-up tilt table testing and the management of vasovagal syncope and related disorders. Heart. 2009;95(5):416-20.
Parry SW, Tan MP. An approach to the evaluation and management of syncope in adults. BMJ. 2010;340:c880.
Brignole M, Alboni P, Benditt D, Bergfeldt L, Blanc JJ, Bloch Thomsen PE, et al. Task force on syncope, European Society of Cardiology. Part 1. The initial evaluation of patients with syncope. Europace. 2001;3(4):253-60.
Noormand R, Shafiee A, Davoodi G, Tavakoli F, Gheini A, Yaminisharif A, et al. Age and the Head-Up Tilt Test Outcome in Syncope Patients. Research in cardiovascular medicine. 2015;4(4):e27871.
Brignole M, Menozzi C, Bartoletti A, Giada F, Lagi A, Ungar A, et al. A new management of syncope: prospective systematic guideline-based evaluation of patients referred urgently to general hospitals. European heart journal. 2006;27(1):76-82.
Brignole M, Ungar A, Bartoletti A, Ponassi I, Lagi A, Mussi C, et al. Standardized-care pathway vs. usual management of syncope patients presenting as emergencies at general hospitals. Europace. 2006;8(8):644-50.
Ammirati F, Colivicchi F, Minardi G, De Lio L, Terranova A, Scaffidi G, et al. [The management of syncope in the hospital: the OESIL Study (Osservatorio Epidemiologico della Sincope nel Lazio)]. G Ital Cardiol. 1999;29(5):533-9.
Ammirati F, Colivicchi F, Santini M. Diagnosing syncope in clinical practice. Implementation of a simplified diagnostic algorithm in a multicentre prospective trial—the OESIL 2 study (Osservatorio Epidemiologico della Sincope nel Lazio). European heart journal. 2000;21(11):935-40.
Farwell D, Sulke N. How do we diagnose syncope? Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology. 2002;13(1 Suppl):S9-13.
Moya A, Sutton R, Ammirati F, Blanc JJ, Brignole M, Dahm JB, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (version 2009) The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Syncope of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). European Heart Journal. 2009;30(21):2631-71.
Suzuki T, MATSUNAGA N, Kohsaka S. Diagnostic patterns in the evaluation of patients hospitalized with syncope. Pacing and clinical electrophysiology. 2006;29(11):1240-4.
Brignole M, Hamdan MH. New concepts in the assessment of syncope. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2012;59(18):1583-91.
Dagres N, Bongiorni MG, Dobreanu D, Madrid A, Svendsen JH, Blomström-Lundqvist C. Current investigation and management of patients with syncope: results of the European Heart Rhythm Association survey. Europace. 2013;15(12):1812-5.
Grubb BP, Temesy-Armos P, Hahn H, Elliott L. Utility of upright tilt-table testing in the evaluation and management of syncope of unknown origin. The American journal of medicine. 1991;90(1):6-10.
Ruwald MH, Hansen ML, Lamberts M, Vinther M, Torp-Pedersen C, Hansen J, et al. Unexplained syncope and diagnostic yield of tests in syncope according to the icd-10 discharge diagnosis. Journal of clinical medicine research. 2013;5(6):441.
Jones PK, Gibbons CH. The Role of Autonomic Testing in Syncope. Autonomic Neuroscience. 2014.
Dipaola F, Costantino G, Solbiati M, Barbic F, Capitanio C, Tobaldini E, et al. Syncope risk stratification in the ED. Autonomic Neuroscience. 2014.
Chiu DT, Shapiro NI, Sun BC, Mottley JL, Grossman SA. Are Echocardiography, Telemetry, Ambulatory Electrocardiography Monitoring, and Cardiac Enzymes in Emergency Department Patients Presenting with Syncope Useful Tests? A Preliminary Investigation. The Journal of emergency medicine. 2014.
Mendu ML, McAvay G, Lampert R, Stoehr J, Tinetti ME. Yield of diagnostic tests in evaluating syncopal episodes in older patients. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(14):1299-305.
- Abstract Viewed: 165 times
- PDF Downloaded: 252 times