Effects of Gradual Reintroduction of Visual Architectural Distractors on Sensory Profiles and Visual Attention in Children with Autism: an In-novation in Sensory Integration Therapy, a pilot study
Journal of Clinical Physiotherapy Research,
Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025),
15 November 2025
,
Page 1-7
https://doi.org/10.22037/jcpr.v10i1.50883
Abstract
Background: Objective measures such as eye tracking offer promise to quantify attention modulation. We report a controlled intervention in which visual distractors in the therapy room were removed and then systematically reintroduced, examining changes in sensory profiles and eye-tracking metrics. Methods: Five children with ADHD were enrolled in intervention group and 5 as controls. At baseline, all participants completed the Short Sensory Profile-2 (SSP-2) and an eye-tracking session to detect primary visual distractors. During a first 3-month, all distractors were removed in both groups, and standard therapy proceeded. After 3 months, all assessments were repeated. In the intervention group, over the next 3 months, architectural distractors were gradually reintroduced (one every 3 weeks) while the control group remained in the distraction-free environment. At the end of 6 months, SSP2and eye tracking were reassessed and compared. Results: In the intervention group, mean total SSP2score improved) from 130 ± 8 at baseline to 145 ± 10 after the first 3 months (p = 0.02), then declined modestly to 138 ± 9 after the second 3 months (p = 0.04). Eye-tracking metrics showed significant reductions in distractor engagement in the second period relative to the midpoint (p<0.03). The control group showed continued gradual improvement in SSP2 (128 ± 7 → 135 ± 9 → 140 ± 10) but no major change in distractor zone metrics. The net SSP2change in intervention group attenuated compared to control (p = 0.04). Conclusions: Findings support the use of eye tracking as an objective outcome measure in sensory-based interventions and highlight the importance of environmental control in autism therapy. Larger controlled trials are needed.
- Autism, Sensory Integration, Eye Tracking System, Architecture
How to Cite
References
1. Tomchek SD, Dunn W. (2007). Sensory processing in children with and without autism: a comparative study using the short sensory profile. Am J Occup Ther. 61(2):190-200. doi: 10.5014/ajot.61.2.190.
2. Sivapalan S, Sivayokan B, Raveenthiran K, Sivayokan S. (2024). Sensory Issues and Their Impact Among Autistic Children: A Cross-Sectional Study in Northern Sri Lanka. Cureus. 22;16(10):e72130. doi: 10.7759/cureus.72130.
3. Case-Smith J, Weaver LL, Fristad MA. (2015) A systematic review of sensory processing interventions for children with autism spectrum disorders. Autism. 19(2):133-48. doi: 10.1177/1362361313517762.
4. Camarata S, Miller LJ, Wallace MT. (2020). Evaluating Sensory Integration/Sensory Processing Treatment: Issues and Analysis. Front Integr Neurosci. 26;14:556660. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2020.556660.
5. Pfeiffer BA, Koenig K, Kinnealey M, Sheppard M, Henderson L. (2011). Effectiveness of sensory integration interventions in children with autism spectrum disorders: a pilot study. Am J Occup Ther. 65(1):76-85. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2011.09205.
6. Sabatos-DeVito M, Schipul SE, Bulluck JC, Belger A, Baranek GT. (2016). Eye Tracking Reveals Impaired Attentional Disengagement Associated with Sensory Response Patterns in Children with Autism. J Autism Dev Disord. 46(4):1319-33. doi: 10.1007/s10803-015-2681-5.
7. Zhang L, Yan G, Zhou L, Lan Z, Benson V. (2020). The Influence of Irrelevant Visual Distractors on Eye Movement Control in Chinese Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Evidence from the Remote Distractor Paradigm. J Autism Dev Disord. 50(2):500-512. doi: 10.1007/s10803-019-04271-y.
8. GAN Jiaqun, WANG Enguo. Attentional disengagement in autism spectrum disorders [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(1): 129-140. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2022.00129.
9. Falck-Ytter T, Bölte S, Gredebäck G. (2013). Eye tracking in early autism research. J Neurodev Disord. 26;5(1):28. doi: 10.1186/1866-1955-5-28.
10. Keehn B, Monahan P, Enneking B, Ryan T, Swigonski N, McNally Keehn R. (2024). Eye-Tracking Biomarkers and Autism Diagnosis in Primary Care. JAMA Netw Open. 1;7(5):e2411190. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.11190.
11. Guillon, Q., et al. (2014). Visual social attention in autism: Eye-tracking evidence. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 353. DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00353
12. Simpson K, Adams D, Alston-Knox C, Heussler HS, Keen D. (2019). Exploring the Sensory Profiles of Children on the Autism Spectrum Using the Short Sensory Profile-2 (SSP-2). J Autism Dev Disord. 49(5):2069-2079. doi: 10.1007/s10803-019-03889-2.
13. Williams ZJ, Failla MD, Gotham KO, Woynaroski TG, Cascio C. (2018). Psychometric Evaluation of the Short Sensory Profile in Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder. J Autism Dev Disord. 48(12):4231-4249. doi: 10.1007/s10803-018-3678-7.
14. Banire, B., Al Thani, D., Qaraqe, M. et al. (2021). Impact of mainstream classroom setting on attention of children with autism spectrum disorder: an eye-tracking study. Univ Access Inf Soc 20, 785–795. Doi:10.1007/s10209-020-00749-0.
15. Mallory C and Keehn B (2021). Implications of Sensory Processing and Attentional Differences Associated With Autism in Academic Settings: An Integrative Review. Front. Psychiatry 12:695825. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.695825
16. Crasta JE, Salzinger E, Lin MH, Gavin WJ, Davies PL.( 2020 ). Sensory Processing and Attention Profiles Among Children With Sensory Processing Disorders and Autism Spectrum Disorders. Front Integr Neurosci. 5;14:22. DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2020.00022.
17. McAllister, K., & Maguire, B. (2012). A design model: The Autism Spectrum Disorder Classroom Design Kit. British Journal of Special Education 39(4). DOI: 10.1111/1467-8578.12006
18. Watling R, Hauer S. Effectiveness of Ayres Sensory Integration® and Sensory-Based Interventions for People With Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review. Am J Occup Ther. 2015 Sep-Oct;69(5):6905180030p1-12. DOI: 10.5014/ajot.2015.018051.
- Abstract Viewed: 95 times
- PDF Downloaded: 35 times