Comparison of Combined and Conventional Rehabilitation with Virtual Monitoring Method on Impulsivity in Parkinson's Patients
Journal of Clinical Physiotherapy Research,
Vol. 5 No. 3 (2020),
4 July 2020
https://doi.org/10.22037/jcpr.v5i3.32444
Abstract
Introduction: Parkinson's disease is a chronic multisystem disease that can cause motor and non-motor symptoms and cognitive changes. One of the most important conservative treatments for Parkinson's disease is physiotherapy. Lack of simultaneous attention to the cognitive aspect of rehabilitation consistent with its physical aspect may be one of the effective reasons for the ineffectiveness of Parkinson's exercise therapy, which has not been considered before. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the effect of fifteen sessions of combined rehabilitation (cognitive and exercise therapy) and conventional rehabilitation (exercise therapy) with virtual monitoring method on the impulsivity of Parkinson's patients. Materials and Methods: This pretest-posttest study had two groups of intervention. The patients were of both sexes and between 50 and 75 years old. The two groups of combined rehabilitation (n=32) and conventional rehabilitation (n=31) were examined for 15 sessions. Before and after the interventions, the level of impulsivity was determined by Barratt questionnaire. The method of measuring and monitoring the interventions in virtual space was designed and implemented. The scores obtained from the questionnaire were analyzed using SPSS 26 software. Mann-Whitney test was used to analyze the mean scores due to the abnormality of the variables. Results: The results showed that after 15 sessions of intervention, there was a significant difference between the two groups of samples in the impulsivity scores of unplanning and coping stability. Combined rehabilitation intervention (cognitive and exercise therapy) had a greater effect on patients' impulsivity than conventional rehabilitation (exercise therapy). Conclusion: Performing both combined and conventional rehabilitation interventions reduced the impulsivity of Parkinson's patients. However, in the group that received combined rehabilitation, the rate of this reduction was significant in most cases. Further interdisciplinary research between physiotherapy and cognitive rehabilitation is recommended, especially for neurological patients such as Parkinson's disease.
- Combined with Conventional Rehabilitation, Impulsivity; Parkinson, Virtual Monitoring Method
How to Cite
References
2. ] Riccò M, Vezzosi L, Balzarini F, Gualerzi G, Ranzieri S, Signorelli C, Colucci ME, Bragazzi NL. Prevalence of Parkinson Disease in Italy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Biomed. 2020 Sep 7;91(3):e2020088. doi: 10.23750/abm.v91i3.9443. PMID: 32921784.
3. Brock P, Fisher JM, Hand A, Walker RW. Highlighting the goals for Parkinson's care: commentary on NICE Guidelines for Parkinson's in Adults (NG71). Age Ageing. 2019 May 1;48(3):323-326. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afy158. PMID: 30260384.
4. Schwartz F, Tahmasian M, Maier F, Rochhausen L, Schnorrenberg KL, Samea F, Seemiller J, Zarei M, Sorg C, Drzezga A, Timmermann L, Meyer TD, van Eimeren T, Eggers C. Overlapping and distinct neural metabolic patterns related to impulsivity and hypomania in Parkinson's disease. Brain Imaging Behav. 2019 Feb;13(1):241-254. doi: 10.1007/s11682-017-9812-x. PMID: 29322397.
5. Hyun-young Choi, Ki-Ho Cho, Chul Jin, JiEun Lee, Tae-Hun Kim, Woo-Sang Jung, Sang-Kwan Moon, Chang-Nam Ko, Seung-Yeon Cho, Chan-Yong Jeon, Tae Young Choi, Myeong Soo Lee, Sang-Ho Lee, Eun Kyoung Chung, Seungwon Kwon, "Exercise Therapies for Parkinson’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis", Parkinson’s Disease, vol. 2020, ArticleID 2565320, 22 pages, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2565320
6. Niemeijer A, Lund H, Stafne SN, et al.Adverse events of exercise therapy in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Sports Medicine 2020;54:1073-1080
7. Eisinger, R.S., Scott, B.M., Le, A. et al. Pavlovian bias in Parkinson’s disease: an objective marker of impulsivity that modulates with deep brain stimulation. Sci Rep 10, 13448 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69760-y
8. Marín-Lahoz J, Pagonabarraga J, Martinez-Horta S, Fernandez de Bobadilla R, Pascual-Sedano B, Pérez-Pérez J, Gironell A and Kulisevsky J (2018) Parkinson's Disease: Impulsivity Does Not Cause Impulse Control Disorders but Boosts Their Severity. Front. Psychiatry 9:465. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00465
9. Ekhtiari, H., Safaei, H., Esmaeeli Djavid, G., Atefvahid, M., Edalati, H., & Mokri, A. (2008). Reliability and Validity of Persian Versions of Eysenck, Barratt, Dickman and Zuckerman Questionnaires in Assessing Risky and Impulsive Behaviors. Iranian Journal Of Psychiatry And Clinical Psychology, 14(3).
10. Stanford, M., Mathias, C., Dougherty, D., Lake, S., Anderson, N., & Patton, J. (2009). Fifty years of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale: An update and review. Personality And Individual Differences, 47(5), 385-395. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.04.008
11. Patton, J., Stanford, M., & Barratt, E. (1995). Factor structure of the barratt impulsiveness scale. Journal Of Clinical Psychology, 51(6), 768-774. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199511)51:6<768::aid-jclp2270510607>3.0.co;2-1
12. Chamorro, J., Bernardi, S., Potenza, M., Grant, J., Marsh, R., Wang, S., & Blanco, C. (2012). Impulsivity in the general population: A national study. Journal Of Psychiatric Research, 46(8), 994-1001. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.04.023
13. Roswarski, T., & Murray, M. (2006). Supervision of Students May Protect Academic Physicians from Cognitive Bias: A Study of Decision Making and Multiple Treatment Alternatives in Medicine. Medical Decision Making, 26(2), 154-161. doi: 10.1177/0272989x06286483
14. Owen, A. (1997). Cognitive planning in humans: Neuropsychological, neuroanatomical and neuropharmacological perspectives. Progress In Neurobiology, 53(4), 431-450. doi: 10.1016/s0301-0082(97)00042-7
15. Wang, Z., Yue, L., Cui, C., Liu, S., Wang, X., Li, Y., & Ma, L. (2019). Top-down control of the medial orbitofrontal cortex to nucleus accumbens core pathway in decisional impulsivity. Brain Structure And Function, 224(7), 2437-2452. doi: 10.1007/s00429-019-01913-w
16. Roswarski, T., & Murray, M. (2006). Supervision of Students May Protect Academic Physicians from Cognitive Bias: A Study of Decision Making and Multiple Treatment Alternatives in Medicine. Medical Decision Making, 26(2), 154-161. doi: 10.1177/0272989x06286483
17. Cross, C., Copping, L., & Campbell, A. (2011). Sex differences in impulsivity: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 137(1), 97-130. doi: 10.1037/a0021591
- Abstract Viewed: 109 times
- PDF Downloaded: 85 times