International Clinical Neuroscience Journal

Vol. 8 No. 4 (2021)

Factors Associated With Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction Severity in Spinal Cord Injury: A Cross-sectional Study

International Clinical Neuroscience Journal, Vol. 8 No. 4 (2021), 30 Aban 2021 , Page 168-174

Abstract

Background: Neurogenic bowel dysfunction (NBD) caused by spinal cord injury (SCI) is a major life limiting issue for many patients. However, studies detailing the factors contributing to bowel problems are scarce. The aim of this cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was to evaluate the associations between different aspects of bowel problems and characteristics of SCI, such as time since injury (TSI), level of injury (LOI), and the cause of injury.
Methods: Two questionnaires (the NBD score questionnaire and the Cleveland clinic constipation system score questionnaire) were administered to complete, traumatic patients with SCI that matched the designated criteria. The total scores and the subscales were then regressed to TSI and LOI, and the distribution patterns of NBD score severity according to LOI and cause of injury were shown in a diagram.
Results: Within the subscales of the NBD score, frequency of defecation, digital stimulation or evacuation of the anorectum, and perianal skin problems were all significantly and positively correlated with the TSI, yet the frequency of fecal incontinence was negatively associated with this variable. Moreover, uneasiness, headache, or perspiration during defecation and regular use of drops against constipation were negatively associated with the LOI. In the diagrams, patterns of NBD score severity were similar according to LOI, but visibly differed according to cause. With respect to the CCCS score (Cleveland Clinic Constipation Scoring System), the score itself was shown to be positively associated with TSI. Within the subscales, difficulty, time spent in lavatory, and duration of constipation were positively correlated with TSI. Furthermore, type of assistance was negatively associated with the LOI.
Conclusion: Different characteristics of SCI, TSI, LOI, and cause, each are significantly and distinctly associated with different aspects of the bowel problems that patients with SCI face.

Keywords:
  • Spinal Cord Injury
  • Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction
  • time since injury (TSI)
  • level of injury (LOI)
  • cause of injury

How to Cite

1.
Mohammadi I, Akhlaghpasand M, Tavanaei R, Golmohammadi M, Zali A, Oraee-Yazdani S. Factors Associated With Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction Severity in Spinal Cord Injury: A Cross-sectional Study. Int Clin Neurosci J [Internet]. 2021 Oct. 30 [cited 2024 Oct. 4];8(4):168-74. Available from: https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/neuroscience/article/view/35540

References

Onose G, Anghelescu A, Muresanu DF, Padure L, Haras MA, Chendreanu CO, et al. A review of published reports on neuroprotection in spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2009;47(10):716-26. doi: 10.1038/sc.2009.52.

Kwon BK, Tetzlaff W, Grauer JN, Beiner J, Vaccaro AR. Pathophysiology and pharmacologic treatment of acute spinal cord injury. Spine J. 2004;4(4):451-64. doi: 10.1016/j. spinee.2003.07.007.

Sekhon LH, Fehlings MG. Epidemiology, demographics, and pathophysiology of acute spinal cord injury. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26(24 Suppl):S2-12. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200112151-00002.

Yuan YM, He C. The glial scar in spinal cord injury and repair. Neurosci Bull. 2013;29(4):421-35. doi: 10.1007/ s12264-013-1358-3.

O’Shea TM, Burda JE, Sofroniew MV. Cell biology of spinal cord injury and repair. J Clin Invest. 2017;127(9):3259-70. doi: 10.1172/jci90608.

Filipp ME, Travis BJ, Henry SS, Idzikowski EC, Magnuson SA, Loh MY, et al. Differences in neuroplasticity after spinal cord injury in varying animal models and humans. Neural Regen Res. 2019;14(1):7-19. doi: 10.4103/1673- 5374.243694.

Ahuja CS, Wilson JR, Nori S, Kotter MRN, Druschel C, Curt A, et al. Traumatic spinal cord injury. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3:17018. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.18.

Stiens SA, Bergman SB, Goetz LL. Neurogenic bowel dysfunction after spinal cord injury: clinical evaluation and rehabilitative management. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78(3 Suppl):S86-102. doi: 10.1016/s0003- 9993(97)90416-0.

Krogh K, Mosdal C, Gregersen H, Laurberg S. Rectal wall properties in patients with acute and chronic spinal cord lesions. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45(5):641-9. doi: 10.1007/ s10350-004-6261-6.

Keshavarzian A, Barnes WE, Bruninga K, Nemchausky B, Mermall H, Bushnell D. Delayed colonic transit in spinal cord-injured patients measured by indium-111 Amberlite scintigraphy. Am J Gastroenterol. 1995;90(8):1295-300.

MacDonagh R, Sun WM, Thomas DG, Smallwood R, Read NW. Anorectal function in patients with complete supraconal spinal cord lesions. Gut. 1992;33(11):1532-8. doi: 10.1136/gut.33.11.1532.

Krogh K, Christensen P, Sabroe S, Laurberg S. Neurogenic bowel dysfunction score. Spinal Cord. 2006;44(10):625-31. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101887.

Levi R, Hultling C, Nash MS, Seiger A. The Stockholm spinal cord injury study: 1. Medical problems in a regional SCI population. Paraplegia. 1995;33(6):308-15. doi: 10.1038/sc.1995.70.

Glickman S, Kamm MA. Bowel dysfunction in spinal-cord-injury patients. Lancet. 1996;347(9016):1651-3. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)91487-7.

Cao Y, Krause JS. The association between secondary health conditions and indirect costs after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2021;59(3):306-10. doi: 10.1038/s41393-020- 00567-4.

Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J, Reissman P, Wexner SD. A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39(6):681-5. doi: 10.1007/bf02056950.

Lynch AC, Wong C, Anthony A, Dobbs BR, Frizelle FA. Bowel dysfunction following spinal cord injury: a

description of bowel function in a spinal cord-injured population and comparison with age and gender matched controls. Spinal Cord. 2000;38(12):717-23. doi: 10.1038/ sj.sc.3101058.

White AR, Holmes GM. Anatomical and functional changes to the colonic neuromuscular compartment after experimental spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2018;35(9):1079-90. doi: 10.1089/neu.2017.5369.

Salvioli B, Bazzocchi G, Barbara G, Stanghellini V, Cremon C, Menarini M, et al. Sigmoid compliance and visceral perception in spinal cord injury patients. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;24(3):340-5. doi: 10.1097/ MEG.0b013e32834fbf73.

Lujan HL, DiCarlo SE. Direct comparison of cervical and high thoracic spinal cord injury reveals distinct autonomic and cardiovascular consequences. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2020;128(3):554-64. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00721.2019.

Rajendran SK, Reiser JR, Bauman W, Zhang RL, Gordon SK, Korsten MA. Gastrointestinal transit after spinal cord injury: effect of cisapride. Am J Gastroenterol. 1992;87(11):1614-7.

De Looze D, Van Laere M, De Muynck M, Beke R, Elewaut A. Constipation and other chronic gastrointestinal problems in spinal cord injury patients. Spinal Cord. 1998;36(1):63-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3100531.

Fakharian E, Mohammadzadeh M, Saberi HR, Fazel MR, Rejali M, Akbari H, et al. Spinal injury resulting from car accident: Focus to prevention. Asian J Neurosurg. 2017;12(2):180-4. doi: 10.4103/1793-5482.152110.

  • Abstract Viewed: 197 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 242 times

Download Statastics