The Effective Brain Areas in Recognition of Dyslexia
International Clinical Neuroscience Journal,
Vol. 7 No. 3 (2020),
21 June 2020
Background: The brain has four lobes consist of frontal, parietal, occipital, and temporal. Most researchers have reported that the left occipitotemporal region of the brain, which is the combined region of the occipital and temporal lobes, is less active in children with dyslexia like Sklar, Glaburda, Ashkenazi and Leisman.
Methods: There are different methods and tools to investigate how the brain works, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET), magneto-encephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG). Among these, EEG determines the electrical activity of the brain with the electrodes placed on the special areas on the scalp. In this research, we processed the EEG signals of dyslexic children and healthy ones to determine what the areas of the brain are most likely to cause the disease.
Results: For this purpose, we extracted 43 features, including relative spectral power (RSP) features, mean, standard deviation, skewness, kurtosis, Hjorth, and AR parameters. Then an SVM classifier is used to separate two classes. Finally, we show the particular brain activation pattern by calculating the correlation coefficients and co-occurrence matrices, which suggests the activation of the working memory region as an active area.
Conclusion: By identifying the brain areas involved in reading activity, it has expected that psychologists and physicians will be able to design the therapeutic exercises to activate this part of the brain.
- occipito-temporal lobe
- signal processing
How to Cite
Guyton A, Hall J. Textbook of Medical Physiology. 11th ed. Elsevier Inc; 2006.
Kropotov J. Quantitative EEG, Event-Related Potentials and Neurotherapy. Academic Press; 2010.
Emrich SM, Al-Aidroos N, Pratt J, Ferber S. Visual search elicits the electrophysiological marker of visual working memory. PLoS One. 2009;4(11):e8042. doi: 10.1371/journal. pone.0008042.
Klimesch W, Doppelmayr M, Wimmer H, Schwaiger J, Röhm D, Gruber W, et al. Theta band power changes in normal and dyslexic children. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001;112(7):1174-85. doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(01)00545-4.
Sklar B, Hanley J, Simmons WW. An EEG experiment aimed toward identifying dyslexic children. Nature. 1972;240(5381):414-6. doi: 10.1038/240414a0.
Galaburda AM, Kemper TL. Cytoarchitectonic abnormalities in developmental dyslexia: a case study. Ann Neurol. 1979;6(2):94-100. doi: 10.1002/ana.410060203.
Silani G, Frith U, Demonet JF, Fazio F, Perani D, Price C, et al. Brain abnormalities underlying altered activation in dyslexia: a voxel based morphometry study. Brain. 2005;128(Pt 10):2453-61. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh579.
Eckert MA, Leonard CM, Wilke M, Eckert M, Richards T, Richards A, et al. Anatomical signatures of dyslexia in children: unique information from manual and voxel based morphometry brain measures. Cortex. 2005;41(3):304-15. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70268-5.
Arns M, Peters S, Breteler R, Verhoeven L. Different brain activation patterns in dyslexic children: evidence from EEG power and coherence patterns for the double-deficit theory of dyslexia. J Integr Neurosci. 2007;6(1):175-90. doi: 10.1142/ s0219635207001404.
Stathopoulou S, Lubar JF. EEG changes in traumatic brain injured patients after cognitive rehabilitation. J Neurother. 2004;8(2):21-51. doi: 10.1300/J184v08n02_03.
Le Jan G, Le Bouquin Jeannès R, Costet N, Faucon G. Discriminatory validity of dyslexia screening tasks in French school age children. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2007;2007:3781-5. doi: 10.1109/iembs.2007.4353155.
Molfese DL. Predicting dyslexia at 8 years of age using neonatal brain responses. Brain Lang. 2000;72(3):238-45. doi: 10.1006/brln.2000.2287.
Bhagavatula V. Advanced Signal Processing and Machine Learning Approaches for EEG Analysis. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University; 2010.
Li K. Advanced Signal Processing Techniques for Single Trial Electroencephalography Signal Classification for Brain Computer Interface Applications [dissertations]. Tampa, Florida: University of South Florida; 2010.
Lakshmi MR, Prasad TV, Prakash VC. Survey on EEG signal processing methods. Int J Adv Res Comput Sci Softw Eng. 2014;4(1):84-91.
Arvaneh M, Guan C, Ang KK, Quek HC. Spatially Sparsed Common Spatial Pattern to Improve BCI Performance. 2011 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP); 2011; Prague, Czech Republic. doi: 10.1109/ICASSP.2011.5946970.
Ofner P, Müller-Putz GR, Neuper C, Brunner C. Comparison of Feature Extraction Methods for Brain-Computer Interfaces. Graz, Austria: 5th International BCI Conference; 2011.
Kay SM. Modern Spectral Estimation. India: Pearson Education India; 1988.
Chok NS. Pearson’s Versus Spearman’s and Kendall’s Correlation Coefficients for Continuous Data [dissertation]. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh; 2010.
Goswami U. Reading, dyslexia and the brain. Educ Res. 2008;50(2):135-48. doi: 10.1080/00131880802082625.
Bao FS, Liu X, Zhang C. PyEEG: an open source Python module for EEG/MEG feature extraction. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011;2011:406391. doi: 10.1155/2011/406391.
Nguyen HB, Xue B, Liu I, Zhang M. Filter Based Backward Elimination in Wrapper Based PSO for Feature Selection in Classification. Beijing, China: 2014 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC); 2014. doi: 10.1109/ CEC.2014.6900657.
Penolazzi B, Spironelli C, Vio C, Angrilli A. Brain plasticity in developmental dyslexia after phonological treatment: a beta EEG band study. Behav Brain Res. 2010;209(1):179-82. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.01.029.
Lerkkanen MK, Rasku-Puttonen H, Aunola K, Nurmi J-E. Developmental dynamics of phonemic awareness and reading performance during the first year of primary school. J Early Child Res. 2004;2(2):139-56. doi: 10.1177/1476718x04042972.
Modrzejewski M. Feature selection using rough sets theory. In: Brazdil PB, ed. European Conference on Machine learning. Berlin: Springer; 1993. doi: 10.1007/3-540-56602-3_138.
Jasper H. Report of the committee on methods of clinical examination in electroencephalography: 1957. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1958;10(2):370-5. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(58)90053-1.
Simões H, Pires G, Nunes UJ, Silva V. Feature Extraction and Selection for Automatic Sleep Staging using EEG. Funchal: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics; 2010. p. 15-18.
Perera H, Shiratuddin MF, Wong KW. Review of EEG-based pattern classification frameworks for dyslexia. Brain Inform. 2018;5(2):4. doi: 10.1186/s40708-018-0079-9.
Theodoridis S, Pikrakis A, Koutroumbas K, Cavouras D. Introduction to Pattern Recognition: A Matlab Approach. Burlington, MA: Academic Press; 2010.
- Abstract Viewed: 327 times
- PDF Downloaded: 394 times