Cut-off Value for Stenosis Ratio and Zung Depression Scale in Successful Prediction of Posterior Spinal Fusion surgery
International Clinical Neuroscience Journal,
Vol. 5 No. 2 (2018),
19 June 2018
Background: The aim of this study was to investigate effect of some clinical attributes in prediction of satisfaction with posterior spinal fusion (PSF) surgery in patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) and lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSCS) and determine a cut-off point for these attributes.
Methods: The attributes such as stenosis ratio (SR) values (described by Lurencin), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA), The Zung depression scale (ZDS), duration of symptoms (in months), were investigated for 329 patients with LSCS and 151 patients with LDH separately. Patient satisfaction was recorded based on the international standard questionnaire Swiss Spinal Stenosis Score (SSS). The sensitivity and specificity values and the optimal cut-off points were calculated for SR, JOA, ZDS and duration of symptoms using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
Results: One hundred fifty-one patients with LDH (39 male, 112 female; mean age 50.24 ± 9.21 years) and 329 patients with LSCS (111 male, 218 female; mean age 53.28 ±7.81 years) were followed–up for 6 months. Post-surgical satisfaction was 73.86% in patients with LSCS and 85.43% in patients with LDH. The cut-off point of SR for prediction of besting surgical outcome was estimated more than 0.46 with asymptotic significance less than 0.05, 60% sensitivity and 75% specificity in LSCS patients (AUC-0.705, 95% CI, 0.644–0.766; P < 0.001).
Conclusion: The findings show that the SR with a cut off value of 0.46 cross sectional area, in patients with LSCS may be superior to JOA, duration of symptoms and ZDS for prediction of satisfaction with PSF surgery.
- Surgical satisfaction
- Posterior Spinal Fusion
- stenosis ratio
- Japanese Orthopaedic Association score
- Zung depression scale
How to Cite
Azimi P, Benzel E, Shahzadi S, Azhdari S, Mohammadi HR. Use of artificial neural networks to predict surgical satisfaction in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis. J Neurosurg Spine 2014; 20: 300–305.
Azimi P, Benzel E, Shahzadi S, Azhdari S, Mohammadi HR. The prediction of successful surgery outcome in lumbar disc herniation based on artificial neural networks. J Neurosurg Sci 2016; 60: 173-177.
Hayashi K, Terai H, Toyoda H, Toyoda H et al. Incidence of Pleural Fluid and Its Associated Risk Factors After Posterior Spinal Fusion in Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. Spine 2017; 42: 603-609.
Mohammadi HR, Azimi P, Benzel EC, Shahzadi S, Azhari S. The role of stenosis ratio as a predictor of surgical satisfaction in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis: A Receiver-Operator Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. J Neurosurg Sci 2016; 60: 345-349.
Takahito F, Shinya O, Motoki I et al. Validity of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system based on patient-reported improvement after posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 2016; 16:728–736.
Azimi P, Benzel EC. Cut-Off Value for Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire in Predicting Surgical Success in Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0160541.
Donk R, Verbeek A, Verhagen W, Groenewoud H, Hosman A, Bartels R. The Qualification of Outcome after Cervical Spine Surgery by Patients Compared to the Neck Disability Index. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0161593.
Matsumoto Y, Harimaya K, Kawaguchi K et al. Dumbbell Scoring System: A New Method for the Differential Diagnosis of Malignant and Benign Spinal Dumbbell Tumors. Spine 2016; 41:E1230-E1236.
Fong Y , Yin S, HuangY. Combining biomarkers linearly and nonlinearly for classification using the area under the ROC curve. Stat Med 2016; 35 :3792-809.
Azimi P, Ghandehari HS, Sadeghi S et al. Severity of symptoms, physical functioning and satisfaction in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a validation study of the Iranian version of the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Score (SSS). J Neurosurg Sci 2014; 58:177-182.
Laurencine CT, Lipson SJ, Senatus P, et al. The stenosis ratio: a new tool for the diagnosis of degenerative spinal stenosis. Int J Surg Investig 1999 ; 1:127–131.
Azimi P, Mohammadi HR, Montazeri A. An outcome measure of functionality and pain in patients with lumbar disc herniation: a validation study of the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score. J Orthop Sci 2012; 17:341–345.
Zung WW, Richards CB, Short MJ. Self-rating depression scale in an outpatient clinic further validation of the SDS. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1965; 13:508-15.
Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, pp156–164, 2000.
Sigmundsson FG, Jönsson B, Strömqvist B. Determinants of patient satisfaction after surgery for central spinal stenosis without concomitant spondylolisthesis: a register study of 5100 patients. Eur Spine J 2017; 26: 473-480.
Sigmundsson FG, Jönsson B, Strömqvist B. Outcome of decompression with and without fusion in spinal stenosis with degenerativespondylolisthesis in relation to preoperative pain pattern: a register study of 1,624 patients. Spine j 2015; 15: 638-46.
Aizawa T, Tanaka Y , Yokoyama T et al. New diagnostic support tool for patients with leg symptoms caused by lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar intervertebral disc herniation: A self-administered, self-reported history questionnaire. J Orthop Sci 2016; 21: 579-85.
Tetreault L, Kopjar B, Nouri A et al. The modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale: establishing criteria for mild, moderate and severe impairment in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy. Eur Spine J 2017; 26:78-84.
Otani R, Fukuhara N, Ochi T, Oyama K, Yamada S. Rapid Growth Hormone Measurement During Transsphenoidal Surgery: Analysis of 252 Acromegalic Patients. Neurol Med Chir 2012; 52: 558-562.
Takenaka s, Asano Y, Shinoda J et al. Comparison of C-Methionine, C-Choline, and F-Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography for Distinguishing Glioma Recurrence from Radiation Necrosis. Neurol Med Chir 2014; 54: 280–289.
- Abstract Viewed: 430 times
- PDF Downloaded: 279 times