Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science
  • New Submission
  • Register
  • Login
  • English
    • فارسی

Advances in Nursing & Midwifery

  • Home
  • Announcements
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • Author Guideline
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Issues
    • Archives
    • Current
    • Accepted Manuscript
  • Indexing/Abstracting
  • Ethics
    • Ethical requirements
    • Publication Ethics and Research Misconduct
    • Ethical Considerations for Human Subjects
  • Declaration of AI Use
  • New Submission
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 31 No. 2 (2022): Advances in Nursing & Midwifery
  4. Research Article

Vol. 31 No. 2 (2022)

April 2022

Global Research Trends on COVID-19: A Bibliometric Analysis Communicating the global research trends

  • Saeed Pahlevan Sharif
  • Hassam Waheed
  • Navaz Naghavi
  • Amir Hossein Goudarzian
  • Hamid Sharif Nia

Advances in Nursing & Midwifery, Vol. 31 No. 2 (2022), 15 April 2022 , Page 39-46
https://doi.org/10.22037/anm.v31i2.39389 Published: 2022-04-15

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • References
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Abstract
Introduction: The emergence of the human coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) in December 2019 caused a public health crisis. Knowing the progress of studies in the field of COVID-19 helps researchers a lot in summarizing the available information. Using a bibliometric analysis this study aims to assess the characteristics of the research publications involving COVID-19 globally.
Methods: To make the bibliometric indicators non-exhaustive, a bibliometric database is created where researchers can have immediate access and contribute to COVID-19 related bibliometric indicators. PubMed database was searched for COVID-19 publications published within 1st January up until 13th March 2020. An R package of Bibliometrix and VOSviewer for comprehensive science mapping analysis and visualization are utilized. Analysis parameters include publication type, pattern of international collaboration, leading journals, the most cited papers and the most productive countries. A total of 786 COVID-19 publications in 238 journals from 69 countries indicates the international spread of the research within short period.
Results: The Lancet (7.64%), Journal of Medical Virology (7.11%) and BMJ (6.08%) had the largest share of publications respectively. Manuscripts published in The New England Journal of Medicine (15 citations), Nature (10 citations), and The Lancet (10 citations) have received the highest citations. China was the largest contributor with 44.27% of total publications followed by the United States (4.58%) and Italy (2.67%).
Conclusions: Canada, Germany and United States had the greatest proportion of international research collaboration as per multiple country publication ratio. There is rapid increase in research activities related to COVID-19 in the initial 11 weeks of 2020.

Keywords:
  • Communication
  • Bibliometrics
  • COVID-19
  • Global Trend
  • pdf

How to Cite

Pahlevan Sharif, S. ., Waheed, H. ., Naghavi, N. ., Goudarzian, A. H. ., & Sharif Nia, H. . (2022). Global Research Trends on COVID-19: A Bibliometric Analysis: Communicating the global research trends. Advances in Nursing & Midwifery, 31(2), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.22037/anm.v31i2.39389
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

References

Eurosurveillance editorial t. Note from the editors: novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). Euro Surveill. 2020;25(3). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2001231 pmid: 31992390

Corman VM, Landt O, Kaiser M, Molenkamp R, Meijer A, Chu DK, et al. Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR. Euro Surveill. 2020;25(3). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045 pmid: 31992387

Worldometer. worldometers. 2020 Available from: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus.

Phan T. Novel coronavirus: From discovery to clinical diagnostics. Infect Genet Evol. 2020;79:104211. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2020.104211 pmid: 32007627

Organization WH. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Report - 52 2020.

Xiao Y, Torok ME. Taking the right measures to control COVID-19. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(5):523-4. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30152-3 pmid: 32145766

Kumar SU, Priya NM, Nithya SR, Kannan P, Jain N, Kumar DT, et al. A review of novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19): based on genomic structure, phylogeny, current shreds of evidence, candidate vaccines, and drug repurposing. 3 Biotech. 2021;11(4):198. doi: 10.1007/s13205-021-02749-0 pmid: 33816047

Koo M. A bibliometric analysis of two decades of aromatherapy research. BMC Res Notes. 2017;10(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2371-1 pmid: 28100267

Lee IS, Lee H, Chen YH, Chae Y. Bibliometric Analysis of Research Assessing the Use of Acupuncture for Pain Treatment Over the Past 20 Years. J Pain Res. 2020;13:367-76. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S235047 pmid: 32104058

Van Nunen K, Li J, Reniers G, Ponnet K. Bibliometric analysis of safety culture research. Safe Sci. 2018;108:248-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.08.011

Lu Z. PubMed and beyond: a survey of web tools for searching biomedical literature. Database (Oxford). 2011;2011:baq036. doi: 10.1093/database/baq036 pmid: 21245076

Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J. 2008;22(2):338-42. doi: 10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF pmid: 17884971

Aria M, Cuccurullo C. bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J Inform. 2017;11(4):959-75. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics. 2010;84(2):523-38. doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 pmid: 20585380

Chiware ER, Becker DA. Research trends and collaborations by applied science researchers in South African universities of technology: 2007-2017. J Academ Librar. 2018;44(4):468-76. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2018.05.003

Sahoo J, Mohanty B, Biswal O, Dash NK, Sahu JK. Authorship trend and content analysis: A case study on highly cited articles in library and information science journals. Performance Measure Metric. 2020. doi: 10.1108/PMM-06-2019-0021

Lotka AJ. The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. J Washington Academ Sci. 1926;16(12):317-23.

Zyoud SH. Global research trends of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: a bibliometric analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2016;16:255. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1600-5 pmid: 27267256

Hirsch L, Breuninger K. Trump signs $8.3 Billion Emergency Coronavirus Spending Package. CNBC com.2020.

Farooq RK, Rehman SU, Ashiq M, Siddique N, Ahmad S. Bibliometric analysis of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) literature published in Web of Science 2019-2020. J Family Community Med. 2021;28(1):1-7. doi: 10.4103/jfcm.JFCM_332_20 pmid: 33679183

Dehghanbanadaki H, Seif F, Vahidi Y, Razi F, Hashemi E, Khoshmirsafa M, et al. Bibliometric analysis of global scientific research on Coronavirus (COVID-19). Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2020;34:51. doi: 10.34171/mjiri.34.51 pmid: 32934940

Hossain MM. Current status of global research on novel coronavirus disease (Covid-19): A bibliometric analysis and knowledge mapping. Hossain MM Current status of global research on novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19): a bibliometric analysis and knowledge mapping [version 1]. 2020. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3547824

  • Abstract Viewed: 408 times
  • pdf Downloaded: 94 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Language

  • English
  • فارسی
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact

Print ISSN: 2383-3750
Electronic ISSN: 2538-399X

Powered by OJSPlus