International Journal of Medical Toxicology and Forensic Medicine

[1] Chiba F, Inokuchi G, Hoshioka Y, Sakuma A. Age estimation by evaluation of osteophytes in thoracic and lumbar vertebrae using postmortem CT images in a modern Japanese population. Int J Legal Med. 2022;136(1):261–7. [DOI: 10.1007/s00414-021-02714-9]

[2] Rösing FW, Graw M, Marré B, Ritz-Timme S, Rothschild MA, Rötzscher K, Schmeling A, Schröder I, Geserick G. Recommendations for the forensic diagnosis of sex and age from skeletons. Homo. 2007;58:75–89. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jchb.2005.07.002]

[3] Nagaoka T, Shizushima A, Sawada J, Tomo S, Hoshino K, Sato H, Hirata K. Sex determination using mastoid process measurements: standards for Japanese human skeletons of the medieval and early modern periods. Anthropol Sci. 2008;116:105–13. [DOI: 10.1537/ase.070605]

[4] Walrath DE, Turner P, Bruzek J. Reliability test of the visual assessment of cranial traits for sex determination. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2004;125:132–137. [DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.10373]

[5] Eltatawy DN, Elsharawy FA, Elbarbary AA, Elsheikh RG, Badawy ME. Multi-detector computed tomography as a diagnostic tool in assessment of thoracic aortic anomalies in pediatric patients. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med. 2021;52(1):39. [DOI: 10.1186/s43055-020-00399-5]

[6] Peyrin F, Engelke K. CT imaging: basics and new trends. In: Fleck I, Titov M, Grupen C, Buvat I, editors. Handbook of Particle Detection and Imaging. 2nd ed. Cham: Springer; 2021. p.1173–215. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-93785-4_36]

[7] Shivdeo A, Lokwani R, Kulkarni V, Kharat A, Pant A. Comparative evaluation of 3D and 2D deep learning techniques for semantic segmentation in CT scans. Electr Eng Syst Sci. 2021:1–9. [DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2101.07612]

[8] Cekdemir YE, Mutlu U, Karaman G, Balci A. Estimation of sex using morphometric measurements performed on cranial computerized tomography scans. La Radiol Med. 2021;126(2):306–15. [DOI: 10.1007/s11547-020-01233-8]

[9] Ramsthaler F, Kettner M, Gehl A, Verhoff MA. Digital forensic osteology: morphological sexing of skeletal remains using volume-rendered cranial CT scans. Forensic Sci Int. 2010;195:148–52. [DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.12.010]

[10] Spradley MK, Jantz RL. Sex estimation in forensic anthropology: skull versus postcranial elements. J Forensic Sci. 2011;56(2):289–96. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01635.x]

[11] Klales AR. Practitioner preferences for sex estimation from human skeletal remains. In: Sex estimation of the human skeleton: history, methods, and emerging techniques. 1st ed. Academic Press; 2020. p.11–23. [DOI: 10.1016/C2017-0-03550-4]

[12] Fekonja A, Čretnik A. Gender and age differences in mandibular ramus and body measurements: a radiographic study. J Hard Tissue Biol. 2022;31(1):9–14. [DOI: 10.2485/jhtb.31.9]

[13] Abdalla MA. Maxillary sinus dimensions of different human age groups by CT scan imaging. Modern Med. 2021;28(2):235–41. [DOI: 10.31689/rmm.2021.28.2.235]

[14] Tanaka LE, Franco A, Abib RF, Manhães-Junior LRC, de Castro Lopes SLP. Age- and sex-related changes of the volume of maxillary sinuses quantified via cone beam computed tomography. Res Soc Dev. 2021;10(14):115–26. [DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v10i14.22220]

[15] Kenawy S, Ellabban M, Fadel A. A novel frontal sinus index protocol for gender determination: a retrospective lateral cephalometric study for Egyptians. Egypt Dent J. 2021;67(3):2199–204. [DOI: 10.21608/edj.2021.76583.1639]

[16] Franklin D, Cardini A, Flavel A, Kuliukas A. Estimation of sex from cranial measurements in a Western Australian population. Forensic Sci Int. 2013;229(1–3):158.e1–8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.03.005]

[17] Rooppakhun S, Surasith P, Vatanapatimakul N, Kaewprom Y, Sitthiseripratip K. Craniometric study of Thai skull based on three-dimensional computed tomography data. J Med Assoc Thai. 2010;93(1):90–8. [Link]

[18] Tambawala SS, Karjodkar FR, Sansare K, Prakash N. Sexual dimorphism of maxillary sinus using cone beam computed tomography. Egypt J Forensic Sci. 2016;6(2):120–5. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejfs.2015.08.002]

[19] Tunis TS, Sarig R, Cohen H, Medlej B, Peled N, May H. Sex estimation using computed tomography of the mandible. Int J Legal Med. 2017;131(6):1691–1700. [DOI: 10.1007/s00414-017-1554-1]

[20] Adel R, Ahmed HM, Hassan OA, Abdelgawad EA. Assessment of craniometric sexual dimorphism using multidetector computed tomographic imaging in a sample of Egyptian population. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2019;40(1):19–26. [DOI: 10.1097/PAF.0000000000000439]

[21] Toneva DH, Nikolova SY, Zlatareva DK, Hadjidekov VG, Lazarov NE. Sex estimation by mastoid triangle using 3D models. Homo. 2019;70(1):63–73. [DOI: 10.1127/homo/2019/1010]

[22] Del Águila MR, González-Ramírez AR. Sample size calculation. Allergol Immunopathol. 2014;42(5):485–92. [DOI: 10.1016/j.aller.2013.03.008]

[23] Parmar HA, Ibrahim M, Mukherji SK. Optimizing craniofacial CT technique. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2014;24(3):395–405. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nic.2014.03.004]

[24] Islam SM, Goonewardene MS, Farella M. A review on three-dimensional facial averaging for the assessment of orthodontic disorders. Innov Adv Comput Informat Syst Sci Eng. 2015;313(1):391–7. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-06773-5_53]

[25] Asif MK, Nambiar P, Khan IM, Aziz ZABCA, Noor NSBM, Shanmuhasuntharam P, Ibrahim N. Enhancing the three-dimensional visualization of a foreign object using Mimics software. Radiol Case Rep. 2019;14(12):1545–9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radcr.2019.10.001]

[26] Kaur R, Juneja M. A hybrid approach for enhancement of abdominal CT images. Comput Electr Eng. 2022;102(1):108291. [DOI: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2022.108291]

[27] Absalan F, Moghadam ARE, Rezaian J. Morphometric cranial standards for sex estimation of a population in two ethnic groups in southwest Iran. Transl Res Anat. 2023;31(1):100249. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tria.2023.100249]

[28] Battan SK, Sharma M, Gakhar G, Garg M, Singh P, Jasuja OP. Cranio-facial bones evaluation based on clinical CT data for sex determination in northwest Indian population. Leg Med. 2023;64:102292. [DOI: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2023.102292]

[29] Okumus O. Determination of age and sex using bimastoid diameter: a cone beam computed tomography study. Odovtos Int J Dent Sci. 2022;24(2):157–63. [DOI: 10.15517/ijds.2022.48365]

[30] Venkatesh G, Gugapriya TS, Vinay Kumar N, Arun Kumar A, Deulkar S. Radio-anatomical observation of volume, anterior wall thickness and pneumatization pattern of frontal sinus. Panacea J Med Sci. 2024;14(2):506–11. [DOI: 10.18231/j.pjms.2024.092]

[31] Mukhopadhyay S, Galui S, Biswas R, Saha S, Sarkar S. Oral and maxillofacial injuries in children: a retrospective study. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;46(3):183–90. [DOI: 10.5125/jkaoms.2020.46.3.183]

[32] Appelt S, Kramer B, Hutchinson EF. Neurovascular territories of the canine fossa: analysis of a South African population. Morphologie. 2023;107(356):22–7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.morpho.2022.02.001]

[33] González-Colmenares G, Sanabria Medina C, Rojas-Sánchez MP, León K, Malpud A. Sex estimation from skull base radiographs in a contemporary Colombian population. J Forensic Leg Med. 2019;2(1):77–81. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jflm.2019.01.006]

[34] Ulcay T, Kamaşak B. Evaluation of craniometric measurements in human skulls. J Health Sci Med. 2021;4(1):38–44. [DOI: 10.32322/jhsm.804341]

[35] Karmarkar PH, Mhapuskar A, Prasad Hiremutt DR, Kale IP, Tepan M, Rao P. Mandibular ramus: an indicator for gender determination. Cureus. 2023;15(1):e34192. [DOI: 10.7759/cureus.34192]

[36] Chan YH. Biostatistics 102: quantitative data – parametric & non-parametric tests. Singapore Med J. 2003;44(8):391–6. [Link]

[37] Chan YH. Biostatistics 104: correlational analysis. Singapore Med J. 2003;44(12):614–9. [Link]

[38] Chan YH. Biostatistics 303: discriminant analysis. Singapore Med J. 2005;46(2):54–62. [Link]

[39] Liljequist D, Elfving B, Skavberg Roaldsen K. Intraclass correlation – a discussion and demonstration of basic features. PLoS One. 2019;14(7):e0219854. [DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219854]

[40] Wilkinson C, Liu CYJ, Shrimpton S, Greenway E. Craniofacial identification standards: a review of reliability, reproducibility, and implementation. Forensic Sci Int. 2024;359(1):379–99. [DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2024.111993]

[41] Chin A, Perry S, Liao C, Yang Y. The relationship between the cranial base and jaw base in a Chinese population. Head Face Med. 2014;10(1):31. [DOI: 10.1186/1746-160X-10-31]

[42] Abdel-Fattah H, Gamal HM, Hadeel S, Reda A. Frontal sinus variations and prevalence of frontal recess cells among adult Egyptians: computerized tomography study. Med J Cairo Univ. 2020;88(6):1143–56. [DOI: 10.21608/mjcu.2020.110851]

[43] Ominde B, Igbigbi P. Frontal sinus dimensions: an aid in gender determination in adult Nigerians. Int J Forensic Odontol. 2021;6(1). [Link]

[44] Caton NR, Dixson BJW. Beyond facial width-to-height ratios: bizygomatic width is highly sexually dimorphic when adjusting for allometry. Biol Lett. 2022;18(10):211. [DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2022.0211]

[45] Ominde BS, Iju W, Igbigbi PS. Retrospective CT study on orbital dimensions and their role in sex determination. Acta Sci Anat. 2022;1(4):2–12. [Link]

[46] Chakraborty P, Bhattacharya A, Ghosh A, Bhattacharya A, Ghosal AK. Morphometric study of different orbital dimensions in dry skull in eastern India – a cross-sectional study. J Anat Radiol Surg. 2023;12(2):AO09. [DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/55329/2878]

[47] Packirisamy V, Aljarrah K, Nayak SB. Morphometric evaluation of the orbital region for sex determination in a Saudi Arabian population using 3DCT images. Anat Sci Int. 2024;99(1):118–26. [DOI: 10.1007/s12565-023-00742-6]

[48] Patra A, Singla RK, Mathur M, Chaudhary P, Singal A, Asghar A, Malhotra V. Morphological and morphometric analysis of the orbital aperture and their correlation with age and gender: a retrospective digital radiographic study. Cureus. 2021;13(9):e17739. [DOI: 10.7759/cureus.17739]

[49] Leao de Queiroz C, Terada AS, Dezem TU, Gomes de Araújo L, Galo R, Oliveira-Santos C, Alves da Silva RH. Sex determination of adult human maxillary sinuses on panoramic radiographs. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2016;50(3):215–21. [DOI: 10.15644/asc50/3/3]

[50] Khaitan T, Kabiraj A, Ginjupally U, Jain R. Cephalometric analysis for gender determination using maxillary sinus index: a novel dimension in personal identification. Int J Dent. 2017;2017(1):211–20. [DOI: 10.1155/2017/7026796]

[51] Abate A, Cavagnetto D, Lanteri V, Maspero C. Three-dimensional evaluation of the maxillary sinus in patients with different skeletal classes and cranio-maxillary relationships assessed with cone beam computed tomography. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):2098. [DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-29391-5]

[52] Aşantoğrol F, Coşgunarslan A. The effect of anatomical variations of the sinonasal region on maxillary sinus volume and dimensions: a three-dimensional study. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2022;88(1):118–27. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.05.001]

[53] Vinay G, Mangala Gowri SR, Anbalagan J. Sex determination of human mandible using metrical parameters. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(12):2671–3. [DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/7621.3728]

[54] Motawei SM, Helaly AMN, Aboelmaaty WM, Elmahdy K, Shabka OA, Liu H. Length of the ramus of the mandible as an indicator of chronological age and sex: a study in a group of Egyptians. Forensic Sci Int Rep. 2020;2(3):100066. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fsir.2020.100066]

[55] Ingaleshwar P, Bhosale S, Nimbulkar G, Britto F, Chandrappa PR, Hosur MB. Mandibular ramus: an indicator for gender determination – a digital panoramic study in Bagalkot population. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2023;27(1):66–70. [DOI: 10.4103/jomfp.jomfp_62_22]

[56] De Oliveira FT, Soares MQS, Sarmento VA, Rubira CM, Lauris JR, Rubira-Bullen IR. Mandibular ramus length as an indicator of chronological age and sex. Int J Legal Med. 2015;129(1):195–201. [DOI: 10.1007/s00414-014-1077-y]

[57] Buran F, Can I, Ekizoğlu O, Balcı A, Guleryuz H. Estimation of age and sex from bimastoid breadth with 3D computed tomography. Rom J Legal Med. 2018;26(1):56–61. [DOI: 10.4323/rjlm.2018.56]

[58] Madadin M, Menezes RG, Al Dhafeeri O, Kharoshah MA, Al Ibrahim R, Nagesh KR, Ramadan SU. Evaluation of the mastoid triangle for determining sexual dimorphism: a Saudi population-based study. Forensic Sci Int. 2015;254:244.e1–4. [DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.06.019]

[59] Sathawane RS, Sukhadeve VA, Chandak RM, Lanjekar AB, Moon GV. Sex determination by maxillary sinus dimensions using cone-beam computed tomography and discriminant function: an analytical study. Int J Forensic Odontol. 2020;5(1):19–22. [DOI: 10.48165/jiafm.2023.45.1.15]

[60] Deshpande AA, Munde AD, Mishra SS, Kawsankar KD, Sawade RV, Mandar B. Determination of sexual dimorphism of maxillary sinus using cone-beam computed tomography in a rural population of western Maharashtra – a retrospective, cross-sectional study. J Family Med Prim Care. 2022;11(4):1257–61. [DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_389_21]

[61] Ravali CT. Gender determination of maxillary sinus using CBCT. Int J Appl Dent Sci. 2017;3(4):221–4. [DOI: 10.22502/jlmc.v8i2.382]

[62] Patel UP, Makardar UK, Layeeqeu KM, Balkund K. Identification of sex from maxillary sinus in western Maharashtra population. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2020;14(4):607–11. [DOI: 10.37506/ijfmt.v14i4.11552]

[63] Hadhoud RM, Abdelhakim E. Validity of computed tomography maxillary sinuses dimensions measuring in sex determination in Egyptian sample. Ain Shams J Forensic Med Clin Toxicol. 2022;38(1):87–91. [DOI: 10.21608/ajfm.2022.213901]

[64] Verma P, Mahajan P, Puri A, Kaur S, Mehta S. Gender determination by morphometric analysis of mandibular ramus in Sriganganagar population: a digital panoramic study. Indian J Dent Res. 2020;31(3):444–448. [DOI: 10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_547_17]

[65] Fatima M, Rashid B, Murtaza G. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography-based anthropometric measurements of maxillary sinuses in sex determination in Pakistani population. Ann Jinnah Sindh Med Univ. 2023;7(2):3–7. [DOI: 10.46663/ajsmu.v7i1.3-7]

[66] Kilroy GS, Tallman SD, DiGangi EA. Secular change in morphological cranial and mandibular trait frequencies in European Americans born 1824–1987. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2020;173(3):589–605. [DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.24115]

[67] Ubelaker D, DeGaglia C. Population variation in skeletal sexual dimorphism. Forensic Sci Int. 2017;278:407.e1–7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.06.012]

[68] Mahmoud HS, Ahmed GS, Zidan A, Eid A. Evaluation of maxillary sinus dimensions in sex and age determination among a sample of Egyptians using computed tomography. Egypt J Forensic Sci Appl Toxicol. 2022;22(3):17–25. [DOI: 10.21608/ejfsat.2022.85911.1209]

[69] Rosa OE, Crosato EM, Castro CC, Oliveira RE, Biazevic MGH. Comparative study of sex estimates in adult skulls using direct measurement and tomographic image reconstruction. Braz Oral Res. 2023;37:e064. [DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2023.vol37.0064]

[70] Attia MH, Farghaly YT, Abulnoor BAE, Curate F. Performance of supervised learning algorithms in sex estimation of the proximal femur: a comparative study in contemporary Egyptian and Turkish samples. Sci Justice. 2022;62(3):288–309. [DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2022.03.003]

[71] Colman KL, Dobbe JGG, Stull KE, Ruijter JM, Oostra RJ, van Rijn RR, van der Merwe AE, de Boer HH, Streekstra GJ. The geometrical precision of virtual bone models derived from clinical computed tomography data for forensic anthropology. Int J Legal Med. 2017;131(4):1155–63. [DOI: 10.1007/s00414-017-1548-z]