The Impact of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Waves on DNA Fragmentation Index and Spermatogenesis-related Genes Expression in Rats
International Journal of Medical Toxicology and Forensic Medicine,
Vol. 14 No. 4 (2024),
12 October 2024
https://doi.org/10.32598/ijmtfm.v14i4.45951
Abstract
Background: We aimed to evaluate the impact of radiofrequency electromagnetic waves (RF-EMW) with wavelengths equivalent to mobile phones on semen parameters and expression levels of spermatogenesis-related genes in rats.
Methods: A total of 20 male adult Wistar rats weighing approximately 180 g were randomly allocated to two study groups in this controlled, parallel-design study. The case group was exposed to RF-EMW. The gene’s expression was assessed by real-time PCR for five target genes: ZBTB16, SCP3, ACR, ITGA6, and PRM1.
Results: The DNA fragmentation index (DFI) assessment reveals a significant difference between the cases and the control group. There was a two-fold increase in ACR gene expression than in the RF-EMW exposure group. The contradictory result was seen in the other four genes, which showed that gene expression decreased to about 0.3 for PRM1 and SCP3, 0.5 for ITGA6, and 0.7 for ZBTB16. Sperm motility was not significantly different between the two groups, but morphology in the case group revealed higher abnormalities than in the control group.
Conclusion: We recommend reducing exposure time to radiofrequency waves, and keeping cell phones away from our bodies as far as possible is safer. Additional studies are required to support our data.
- Radio waves
- Infertility
- Semen analysis
- Gene expression
How to Cite
References
Bolte JF, Eikelboom T. Personal radiofrequency electromagnetic field measurements in The Netherlands: exposure level and variability for everyday activities, times of day and types of area. Environment International. 2012; 48:133-42. [DOI:10.1016/j.envint.2012.07.006] [PMID]
Gholami K. Experimental approaches for fertility preservation in prepubertal boys undergoing oncological therapy. Translational Research in Urology. 2020; 2(4):123-6. [DOI:10.22034/tru.2020.259243.10546]
Ashouri Movassagh S, Ashouri Movassagh S, Banitalebi Dehkordi M, Pourmand G, Gholami K, Talebi A, et al. Isolation, identification and differentiation of human spermatogonial cells on three-dimensional decellularized sheep testis. Acta Histochemica. 2020; 122(8):151623. [DOI:10.1016/j.acthis.2020.151623] [PMID]
International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). ICNIRP note: Critical evaluation of two radiofrequency electromagnetic field animal carcinogenicity studies published in 2018. Health Physics. 2020; 118(5):525-32. [DOI:10.1097/HP.0000000000001137] [PMID]
Lias K, Teen AHW, Mat DAA, Kipli K, Marzuki ASW, Husin MH. Biological effect of 900MHz and 1800MHz mobile phones in SAR weight. Paper presented in: 2009 International Conference on Information and Multimedia Technology. 18 December 2009; Jeju, South Korea. [DOI:10.1109/ICIMT.2009.69]
Zalata A, El-Samanoudy AZ, Shaalan D, El-Baiomy Y, Mostafa T. In vitro effect of cell phone radiation on motility, DNA fragmentation and clusterin gene expression in human sperm. International Journal of Fertility & Sterility. 2015; 9(1):129-36. [PMID] [PMCID]
Çetkin M, Kızılkan N, Demirel C, Bozdağ Z, Erkılıç S, Erbağcı H. Quantitative changes in testicular structure and function in rat exposed to mobile phone radiation. Andrologia. 2017; 49(10). [DOI:10.1111/and.12761] [PMID]
Dym M, Kokkinaki M, He Z. Spermatogonial stem cells: mouse and human comparisons. Birth Defects Research. 2009; 87(1):27-34. [DOI:10.1002/bdrc.20141] [PMID]
Reda A, Hou M, Winton TR, Chapin RE, Söder O, Stukenborg JB. In vitro differentiation of rat spermatogonia into round spermatids in tissue culture. Molecular Human Reproduction. 2016; 22(9):601-12. [DOI:10.1093/molehr/gaw047] [PMID] [PMCID]
Steger K, Balhorn R. Sperm nuclear protamines: A checkpoint to control sperm chromatin quality. Anatomia, Histologia, Embryologia. 2018; 47(4):273-9. [DOI:10.1111/ahe.12361] [PMID]
Nabighadim A, Zareian Baghdadabad L, Taheri D, Noori N, Mashhadi R, Abedi Yarandi V. Cell phone electromagnetic waves exposure impact on the histopathologic changes of urinary system stones in rats. Translational Research in Urology. 2021; 3(3):136-42. [DOI:10.22034/tru.2021.299456.1079]
Wyde ME, Horn TL, Capstick MH, Ladbury JM, Koepke G, Wilson PF, et al. Effect of cell phone radiofrequency radiation on body temperature in rodents: Pilot studies of the National Toxicology Program's reverberation chamber exposure system. Bioelectromagnetics. 2018; 39(3):190-9. [DOI:10.1002/bem.22116] [PMID]
Khushboo M, Murthy MK, Devi MS, Sanjeev S, Ibrahim KS, Kumar NS, et al. Testicular toxicity and sperm quality following copper exposure in Wistar albino rats: Ameliorative potentials of L-carnitine. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International. 2018; 25(2):1837-62. [DOI:10.1007/s11356-017-0624-8] [PMID]
García-Molina A, Valverde A, Bompart D, Caldeira C, Vendrell A, Soler C. Updating semen analysis: A subpopulation approach. Asian Journal of Andrology. 2020; 22(1):118-9. [DOI:10.4103/aja.aja_33_19] [PMID] [PMCID]
Oluwakemi O, Olufeyisipe A. DNA fragmentation and oxidative stress compromise sperm motility and survival in late pregnancy exposure to omega-9 fatty acid in rats. Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences. 2016; 19(5):511-20. [PMID] [PMCID]
Agarwal A, Singh A, Hamada A, Kesari K. Cell phones and male infertility: A review of recent innovations in technology and consequences. International Braz J Urol. 2011; 37(4):432-54. [DOI:10.1590/S1677-55382011000400002] [PMID]
Gholami K, Vermeulen M, Del Vento F, de Michele F, Giudice MG, Wyns C. The air-liquid interface culture of the mechanically isolated seminiferous tubules embedded in agarose or alginate improves in vitro spermatogenesis at the expense of attenuating their integrity. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology. Animal. 2020; 56(3):261-70. [DOI:10.1007/s11626-020-00437-6] [PMID]
Al-Bayyari N. The effect of cell phone usage on semen quality and fertility among Jordanian males. Middle East Fertility Society Journal. 2017; 22(3):178-82. [DOI:10.1016/j.mefs.2017.03.006]
Kesari KK, Agarwal A, Henkel R. Radiations and male fertility. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology. 2018; 16(1):118. [DOI:10.1186/s12958-018-0431-1] [PMID] [PMCID]
Mailankot M, Kunnath AP, Jayalekshmi H, Koduru B, Valsalan R. Radio frequency electromagnetic radiation (RF-EMR) from GSM (0.9/1.8GHz) mobile phones induces oxidative stress and reduces sperm motility in rats. Clinics. 2009; 64(6):561-5. [DOI:10.1590/S1807-59322009000600011] [PMID] [PMCID]
J Hamada AJ, Singh A, Agarwal A. Cell phones and their impact on male fertility: Fact or fiction. The Open Reproductive Science Journal. 2011; 3(1):125-37. [DOI:10.2174/1874255601103010125]
La Vignera S, Condorelli RA, Vicari E, D'Agata R, Calogero AE. Effects of the exposure to mobile phones on male reproduction: A review of the literature. Journal of Andrology. 2012; 33(3):350-6. [DOI:10.2164/jandrol.111.014373] [PMID]
Adams JA, Galloway TS, Mondal D, Esteves SC, Mathews F. Effect of mobile telephones on sperm quality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Environment International. 2014; 70:106-12. [DOI:10.1016/j.envint.2014.04.015] [PMID]
Gorpinchenko I, Nikitin O, Banyra O, Shulyak A. The influence of direct mobile phone radiation on sperm quality. Central European Journal of Urology. 2014; 67(1):65-71. [DOI:10.5173/ceju.2014.01.art14]
Oyewopo AO, Olaniyi SK, Oyewopo CI, Jimoh AT. Radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation from cell phone causes defective testicular function in male Wistar rats. Andrologia. 2017; 49(10):e12772. [DOI:10.1111/and.12772] [PMID]
Odacı E, Hancı H, Yuluğ E, Türedi S, Aliyazıcıoğlu Y, Kaya H, et al. Effects of prenatal exposure to a 900 MHz electromagnetic field on 60-day-old rat testis and epididymal sperm quality. Biotechnic & Histochemistry. 2016; 91(1):9-19. [DOI:10.3109/10520295.2015.1060356] [PMID]
Atqiaee K, Mohammadi Tofigh A, Salehpour S, Mirshemirani A. Leydig Cell Tumor In Children: A case report and literature review. Translational Research In Urology. 2020; 2(2):32-6. [DOI:10.22034/tru.2020.246610.1031]
Gohari FA, Saranjam B, Asgari M, Omidi L, Ekrami H, Moussavi-Najarkola SA. An experimental study of the effects of combined exposure to microwave and heat on gene expression and sperm parameters in mice. Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences. 2017; 10(2):128-34. [DOI:10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_136_16] [PMID] [PMCID]
Zalata A, El-Samanoudy AZ, Shaalan D, El-Baiomy Y, Taymour M, Mostafa T. Seminal clusterin gene expression associated with seminal variables in fertile and infertile men. The Journal of Urology. 2012; 188(4):1260-4. [DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2012.06.012] [PMID]
Golkar Moghaddam M, Zafar Balanejad S, Khayatzadeh J. [Effect of cell phone radiation on sperm characteristics and DAZL gene expression in BALB/c mice (Persian)]. Journal of Gorgan University of Medical Sciences. 2020; 22(4):63-9. [Link]
Obajuluwa AO, Akinyemi AJ, Afolabi OB, Adekoya K, Sanya JO, Ishola AO. Exposure to radio-frequency electromagnetic waves alters acetylcholinesterase gene expression, exploratory and motor coordination-linked behaviour in male rats. Toxicology Reports. 2017; 4:530-4. [DOI:10.1016/j.toxrep.2017.09.007] [PMID] [PMCID]
- Abstract Viewed: 229 times
- pdf Downloaded: 184 times