Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Iran
  • Register
  • Login

International Journal of Medical Toxicology and Forensic Medicine

  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Team
    • Contact
  • Issues
    • Current
    • Archives
  • Indexing & Abstracting
  • Editorial Policies
    • Peer Review Process
    • Ethical Codes: Medical Research
    • Principles of Publishing Ethics
    • Conflicts of Interest
    • Publication Frequency
    • Open Access Policy
    • CrossMark Policy
    • Article Processing Charges
    • Privacy Statement
  • Announcements
  • Register
  • Login
  • Author Guidelines
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 11 No. 1 (2021): International Journal of Medical Toxicology and Forensic Medicine
  4. Original Article (General Medicine)

Vol. 11 No. 1 (2021)

Bahman 2021

Comparison of Short-term Outcome of Thoracoscopic-Laparoscopic Esophagectomy Versus Transhiatal Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Cancer

  • Touraj Asvadi Kermani
  • Seyed Ziaeddin Rasihashemi
  • Moein Hoseinpour Feyzi
  • Seyed Ehsan Mousavai Toomatari

International Journal of Medical Toxicology and Forensic Medicine, Vol. 11 No. 1 (2021), 23 Bahman 2021 , Page 31113
https://doi.org/10.32598/ijmtfm.v11i1.31113 Published: 01/23/2021

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • References
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Background: Esophagectomy is performed in all patients with resectable esophageal cancer. Transthoracic-Laparoscopic Esophagectomy (TLE) is a minimally invasive method and considered to be the most appropriate method. In this study, we aim to evaluate and compare the perioperative outcome, and 1-year overall survival of TLE and Transhiatal Esophagectomy (THE) approaches.
Methods: In this retrospective study, we reviewed the medical records of 108 patients with esophageal cancer undergoing TLE (n=44) or THE (n=64) between 2015 and 2018. The patients were followed for one year. The intraoperative and postoperative findings, as well as 1-year overall-survival, were compared between the two groups.
Results: TLE compared to THE had a longer surgery duration (278.63±33.28 vs 223.28±33.99 min, P=0.001), a higher number of dissected lymph nodes (15.06±2.95 vs 10.21±2.58, P=0.001), less blood loss (345.45±178.76 vs 585.15±294.75 mL, P<0.001), and need for transfusion (20.5% vs 45.3%, P=0.006) during surgery as well as lower ICU stay (2.59±0.77 vs 3.90±0.83 days, P<0.001) and ward stay (8.77±0.96 vs 11.42±1.71 days, P<0.001). THE had somewhat higher complication than TLE, but with no significant differences.
Conclusion: TLE had a similar rate of complication to THE approach, but with lower blood loss and lower ICU and hospital stay, it is a more appropriate method for esophagectomy.

Keywords:
  • Esophageal cancer
  • Laparoscopic
  • Thoracoscopic
  • Transhiatal
  • pdf

How to Cite

Asvadi Kermani, T., Rasihashemi, S. Z., Hoseinpour Feyzi, M., & Mousavai Toomatari, S. E. (2021). Comparison of Short-term Outcome of Thoracoscopic-Laparoscopic Esophagectomy Versus Transhiatal Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Cancer. International Journal of Medical Toxicology and Forensic Medicine, 11(1), 31113. https://doi.org/10.32598/ijmtfm.v11i1.31113
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

References

Zhang Y. Epidemiology of esophageal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2013; 19(34):5598-606. [DOI:10.3748/wjg.v19.i34.5598] [PMID] [PMCID]

Łochowski M, Łochowska B, Kozak J. Transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy: Influence on patient survival. Prz Gastroenterol. 2017; 12(2):118-21. [DOI:10.5114/pg.2016.64609] [PMID] [PMCID]

Takahashi C, Shridhar R, Huston J, Meredith K. Esophagectomy from then to now. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2018; 9(5):903-9. [DOI:10.21037/jgo.2018.08.15] [PMID] [PMCID]

Guo W, Ma X, Yang S, Zhu X, Qin W, Xiang J, et al. Combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy: A meta-analysis of outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2016; 30(9):3873-81. [DOI:10.1007/s00464-015-4692-x] [PMID]

Pennathur A, Zhang J, Chen H, Luketich JD. The “best operation” for esophageal cancer? Ann Thorac Surg. 2010; 89(6):S2163-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.03.068] [PMID] [PMCID]

Zhu ZY, Yong X, Luo RJ, Wang YZ. Clinical analysis of minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy in a single center by a single medical group. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2018; 19(9):718-25. [DOI:10.1631/jzus.B1800329] [PMID] [PMCID]

Ma S, Yan T, Liu D, Wang K, Wang J, Song J, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy in the lateral-prone position: Experience of 124 cases in a single center. Thorac Cancer. 2018; 9(1):37-43. [DOI:10.1111/1759-7714.12524] [PMID] [PMCID]

Chen X, Yang J, Peng J, Jiang H. Case-matched analysis of combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic versus open esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015; 8(8):13516-23. [PMCID] [PMID]

Kinjo Y, Kurita N, Nakamura F, Okabe H, Tanaka E, Kataoka Y, et al. Effectiveness of combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy: Comparison of postoperative complications and midterm oncological outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2012; 26(2):381-90. [DOI:10.1007/s00464-011-1883-y] [PMID]

Singh RK, Pham TH, Diggs BS, Perkins S, Hunter JG. Minimally invasive esophagectomy provides equivalent oncologic outcomes to open esophagectomy for locally advanced (stage II or III) esophageal carcinoma. Arch Surg. 2011; 146(6):711-4. [DOI:10.1001/archsurg.2011.146] [PMID]

Sundaram A, Geronimo JC, Willer BL, Hoshino M, Torgersen Z, Juhasz A, et al. Survival and quality of life after minimally invasive esophagectomy: A single-surgeon experience. Surg Endosc. 2012; 26(1):168-76. [DOI:10.1007/s00464-011-1850-7] [PMID]

Yao F, Wang J, Yao J, Xu L, Qian J, Cao Y. Is thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy a better alternative to thoracoscopic esophagectomy? Int J Surg. 2017; 48:105-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.10.036] [PMID]

Noble F, Kelly JJ, Bailey IS, Byrne JP, Underwood TJ; South Coast Cancer Collaboration-Oesophago-Gastric (SC3-OG). A prospective comparison of totally minimally invasive versus open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Dis Esopha Gus. 2013; 26(3):263-71. [DOI:10.1111/j.1442-2050.2012.01356.x] [PMID]

Bagheri R, Ziaollah Haghi S, Hazrati N, Silanian Toosi M, Ahadi M. Comparison the outcomes of open thoracotomy and minimally invasive thoracoscopic esophagectomy in esophageal cancer. J Cardiothorac Med. 2017; 5(2):569-74. http://jctm.mums.ac.ir/article_8746.html

Braghetto I, Csendes A, Cardemil G, Burdiles P, Korn O, Valladares H. Open transthoracic or transhiatal esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy in terms of morbidity, mortality and survival. Surg Endosc. 2006; 20(11):1681-6. [DOI:10.1007/s00464-006-0009-4] [PMID]

Murakami M, Otsuka K, Goto S, Ariyoshi T, Yamashita T, Aoki T. Thoracoscopic and hand assisted laparoscopic esophagectomy with radical lymph node dissection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in the left lateral decubitus position: a single center retrospective analysis of 654 patients. BMC Cancer. 2017; 17(1):748. [DOI:10.1186/s12885-017-3743-1] [PMID] [PMCID]

Zhou SH, Song YB, Liu LJ, Cui HS. Optimized total thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. World J Surg Oncol. 2016; 14(1):1-6. [DOI:10.1186/s12957-016-0824-6] [PMID] [PMCID]

Nilsson M, Kamiya S, Lindblad M, Rouvelas I. Implementation of minimally invasive esophagectomy in a tertiary referral center for esophageal cancer. J Thorac Dis. 2017; 9(Suppl 8):S817-S825. [DOI:10.21037/jtd.2017.04.23] [PMID] [PMCID]

Kubo N, Ohira M, Yamashita Y, Sakurai K, Toyokawa T, Tanaka H, et al. The impact of combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic surgery on pulmonary complications after radical esophagectomy in patients with resectable esophageal cancer. Anticancer Res. 2014; 34(5):2399-404. https://ar.iiarjournals.org/content/34/5/2399.short

Nguyen NT, Follette DM, Wolfe BM, Schneider PD, Roberts P, Goodnight JE Jr. Comparison of minimally invasive esophagectomy with transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy. Arch Surg. 2000; 135(8):920-5. [DOI:10.1001/archsurg.135.8.920] [PMID]

  • Abstract Viewed: 302 times
  • pdf Downloaded: 278 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Developed By

Open Journal Systems

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Browse

Make a Submission

Make a Submission
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact

 

Copyright  The Author(s); This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-By-NC), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

       

Powered by OJSPlus