Failures to Cure and Diagnose Cervical Cancer
International Journal of Medical Toxicology and Forensic Medicine,
Vol. 9 No. 4 (2019),
11 November 2019
Background: Cervical cancer is one of the most common cancers in developing countries and the second most common cancer in women worldwide. Using the screening test, cancer can be detected in the early stages and, thus, mortality will be reduced. Also, the early detection of cervical cancer could affect survival rate and time. But, the diagnostic and therapeutic methods of this disease are usually accompanied by errors that deduct the success rate.
Methods: In this study, a variety of common errors in the detection and treatment of cervical cancer were investigated by reviewing and evaluating scientific resources.
Results: Studies show the different medical failures during sampling, preparation, review, and interpretation of the sample. On the other hand, inappropriate operation and errors in the treatment pathway are common errors after diagnosis. Because of the types of these errors, preparing the information of papers investigating the possible types of errors and observing accuracy will play a significant role in reducing the failures.
Conclusion: Because of the fact that cervical cancer is fully curable with proper and timely diagnosis, the early diagnosis is important and it is the responsibility of doctors, pathologists, and surgeons in this area. Therefore, monitoring and preventing errors in the diagnosis and treatment is directly associated with a reduction in the mortality rate of the disease.
- Cervix uteri
How to Cite
1. Fakour F, Atrkar Roshan Z, Shaef SP, Dalil Heyrati SF. [Sensitivity and features of Visual Inspection of Cervix with Acetic Acid (VIA), as a screening test for cervical cancer (Persian)]. Journal of Guilan University of Medical Sciences. 2011; 20(79):49-55.
2. Steven H. Schafer & Associates. Delayed diagnosis of cervical cancer. Massachusetts: Lawyers’ Global Directory; 2002.
3. Jena AB, Chandra A, Lakdawalla D, Seabury S. Outcomes of medical malpractice litigation against US physicians. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2012; 172(11):892-4. [DOI:10.1001/archinternmed.2012.1416] [PMID]
4. Spence AR, Goggin P, Franco EL. Process of care failures in invasive cervical cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Preventive Medicine. 2007; 45(2):93-106. [DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.06.007] [PMID]
5. Berthelson L, Mulchan SS, Odland AP, Miller LJ, Mittenberg W. False positive diagnosis of malingering due to the use of multiple effort tests. Brain Injury. 2013; 27(7-8):909-16. [DOI:10.3109/02699052.2013.793400] [PMID]
6. Schneider V, Henry MR, Jimenez-Ayala M, Turnbull LS, Wright TC. Cervical cancer screening, screening errors and reporting. Acta Cytologica. 2001; 45(4):493-8. [DOI:10.1159/000327853] [PMID]
7. Screening for cancer of the uterine cervix. From the IARC working group on cervical cancer screening and the UICC project group on the evaluation of screening programmes for cancer. IARC Scientific Publications. 1986; (76):1-315. [PMID]
8. Hakama M, Chamberlain J, Day NE, Miller AB, Prorok PC. Evaluation of screening programmes for gynaecological cancer. British Journal of Cancer. 1985; 52(4):669-73. [DOI:10.1038/bjc.1985.241] [PMID] [PMCID]
9. Brawley OW, Kramer BS. Cancer screening in theory and in practice. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2005; 23(2):293-300. [DOI:10.1200/JCO.2005.06.107] [PMID]
10. Kwa SK. Failure to diagnose cervical cancer: What went wrong? Malaysian Family Physician. 2010; 5(2):109. [PMID] [PMCID]
11. Perkins RB, Cain JM, Feldman S. Using risk stratification to reduce medical errors in cervical cancer prevention. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2017; 177(10):1411-2. [DOI:10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.3999] [PMID]
12. Ghaemmaghami F, Hasanzadeh M. [Improper simple hysterectomy in invasive cervical cancer (Persian)]. Cancer Therapy. 2005; 3:357-8.
13. Rodolakis A, Diakomanolis E, Haidopoulos D, Voulgaris Z, Protopapas A, Makris N, et al. How to avoid suboptimal management of cervical carcinoma by simple hysterectomy. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 1999; 20(5-6):418-22. [PMID]
14. DeMay RM. Common problems in Papanicolaou smear interpretation. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. 1997; 121(3):229-38. [PMID]
15. Ameri M, Memarian A, Behtash N, Karimi Zarchi M. The importance of re-examination with deep biopsies in diagnosing cervical malignancies despite multiple negative pathology reports: A case report. International Journal of Surgery Case Reports. 2015; 14:48-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijscr.2015.07.010] [PMID] [PMCID]
16. Hatem F, Wilbur DC. High grade squamous cervical lesions following negative Papanicolaou smears: False-negative cervical cytology or rapid progression. Diagnostic Cytopathology. 1995; 12(2):135-41. [DOI:10.1002/dc.2840120209] [PMID]
17. Bahiraee A. [The importance of pap smear in detecting cervical cancer (Persian)]. Hayat. 1999; 5(2):39-45.
18. Evans KK, Tambouret RH, Evered A, Wilbur DC, Wolfe JM. Prevalence of abnormalities influences cytologists’ error rates in screening for cervical cancer. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. 2011; 135(12):1557-60. [DOI:10.5858/arpa.2010-0739-OA] [PMID] [PMCID]
19. Derman H. Quality and liability issues with the Papanicolaou smear. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. 1997; 121(3):287-91. [PMID]
20. Berwick DM. The science of improvement. The Journal of the American Medical Association. 2008; 299(10):1182-4. [DOI:10.1001/jama.299.10.1182] [PMID]
21. Miller D. Brain processing of optical input: The perception of visual reality. MD Computing: Computers in Medical Practice. 1994; 11(1):34-42.
22. Weinert HV, Brill R. Effectiveness of hospital tissue committee in raising surgical standards. The Journal of the American Medical Association. 1952; 150(10):992-6. [DOI:10.1001/jama.1952.03680100034011] [PMID]
23. Pourjavad M. [Accuracy of colposcopy and pap smear in screening for cervical cancer (Persian)]. Journal of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. 1380; 44(72):73-8.
24. Mahmoodi A, Ghafari P. [Diagnostic value of pap smear in comparison with colposcopy in diagnosis of abnormal cases in women referred to gynecological clinic (Persian)]. Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility. 2017; 20(10):69-74. [DOI:10.22038/IJOGI.2017.10158]
25. Yousefi Z, Homaee Shandiz F, Talebian M, Esmaily H, Hasanzadeh M. Surgeons’ errors in the management of patients with cervical cancer. Journal of Midwifery and Reproductive Health. 2014; 2(3):165-9. [DOI:10.22038/JMRH.2014.2849]
- Abstract Viewed: 129 times
- PDF Downloaded: 107 times