Is the Bayley screening test norms appropriate for Persian language children?
Iranian Journal of Child Neurology,
Vol. 12 No. 2 (2018),
14 March 2018
Objective: To evaluate the distribution of the Bayley screening test scores by age, in Persian children and compare developmental risk categories distributions between Persian and reference norms.
Materials & Methods: A representative sample of 417, 1 to 42-months-old, typically developing children by consecutive sampling from health -care centers recruited, during the 2014 to 2015 in Tehran city. The Bayley measures children’s cognitive, receptive and expressive communication, fine and gross motor skills. For determining cut points for the subtest scores, two cuts points were determined for each age group, dividing scores into the three bands that identify the at risk, emerging (between the 2nd and 25th percentiles), and competent categories. We estimated the agreement between the distributions of the risk categories between the two samples using weighted kappa statistics.
Results: The comparison of neurodevelopmental classification of children based on two norms determined that; approximately 70-80% of all tests administered to the participating children were classified as normal by both norms. Weighted kappa coefficients for the five subtests ranged from 0.56 to 0.89 suggesting moderate agreement between the classification using the reference and Persian norms. Expressive and receptive communication subtests had the lowest kappa scores (0.56 and 0.59, respectively), and classification of gross motor demonstrated the highest level of agreement (0.89).
Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that reliance on reference -based norms for the Bayley test in Persian children results in misclassification of developmental delay.
- Developmental screening
- Child development
- testing norms
- Screening tools
How to Cite
Grantham-McGregor S, Cheung YB, Cueto S, Glewwe P, Richter L, Strupp B. Developmental potential in the first 5 years for children in developing countries. Lancet 2007; 369(9555):60e70.
Boulet, SL, Boyle CA, Schieve LA. Health care use and health and functional impact of developmental disabilities among US children, 1997–2005. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine 2009; 163:19–26.
Jelliffe-Pawlowski LL, Shaw GM, Nelson V, Harris JA. Risk of mental retardation among children born with birth defects. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine 2003:157; 545–550.
Soleimani F, Vameghi R, Hemmati S, Salman Roghani R. Perinatal and neonatal risk factors for neuro-developmental outcome in infants in Karaj. AIM 2009; 12 (2):135-139.
Soleimani F, Vameghi R, Biglarian A. Antenatal and Intrapartum Risk Factors for Cerebral Palsy in Term and Near-term Newborns. Arch Iran Med 2013; 16(4): 213 – 216.
American Academy of Pediatrics, Council on Children with Disabilities. Identifying infants and young children with developmental disorders in the medical home: An algorithm for developmental surveillance and screening. Pediatric 2006; 118: 405–420.
Glascoe FP. Screening for developmental and behavioral problems. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev 2005; 11: 173-179.
Cicchetti D. Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess 1994; 6(4):284e90.
Soleimani F, Vameghi R, Biglarian A, Rahgozar M: Prevalence of Motor Developmental Disorders in Children in Alborz Province, Iran in 2010. Iran Red Crescent Med J 2014; 16(12).
Bayley N. Bayley scales of infant and toddler development: Bayley- III. 2006. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.
Soleimani F, Azari N, Vameghi R, Sajedi F, Shahshahani S, Karimi H, Kraskian A, Shahrokhi A, Teymouri R, Gharib M. Is the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Developmental Screening Test, valid and reliable for Persian speaking children? Iran J Pediatr 2016; 26(5):e5540:83-90.
Azari N, Soleimani F, Vameghi R, Sajedi F, Shahshahani S, Karimi H, Kraskian A, Shahrokhi A, Teymouri R, Gharib M. A Psychometric Study of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development in Persian Language Children. Iran J Child Neurol; 2017; 17(1):50-56.
Van de Vijver FJR, Hambleton RK. Translating tests: some practical guidelines. Eur Psychol 1996;1(2).
Poortinga YH. Cultural bias in assessment: historical and thematic issues. Eur J Psychol Assess 1995;11(3):140e6.
Abubakar A, Van De Vijver FJ, Mithwani S, Obiero E, Lewa N, Kenga S, et al. Assessing developmental outcomes in children from Kilifi, Kenya, following prophylaxis for seizures in cerebral malaria. J Health Psychol 2007; 12(3):417e30.
Fernald LCH, Kariger P, Engle P, Raikes A. Examining early child development in low-income countries: a toolkit for the assessment of children in the first five years of life. Washington, DC: The World Bank; 2009.
Hambleton RK. Guidelines for adapting educational and psychological tests: a progress report. Eur J Psychol Assess 1994; 10(3):229e44.
Hambelton RK. Issues, designs, and technical guidelines for adapting tests into multiple languages and cultures. In: Hambleton RK, Merenda PF, Speilberger CD, editors. Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc; 2005. pp. 3e37.
Ceci SJ. How much does schooling influence general intelligence and its cognitive components? A reassessment of the evidence. Dev Psychol 1991;27(5):703e22.
Ceci SJ, Williams WM. Schooling, intelligence, and income. Am Psychol 1997; 52(10): 1051e8.
Hansen KT, Heckman JJ, Mullen KJ. The effect of schooling and ability on achievement test scores. J Econ 2004; 121(1e2):3.
Alcock KJ, Holding PA, Mung’ala-Odera V, Newton CRJC. Constructing tests of cognitive abilities for schooled and unschooled children. J Cross Cult Psychol 2008; 39(5):529e51.
Kaplan-Sanoff M, Parker S, Zuckerman B. Poverty and early childhood development: what do we know, and what should we do? Infants Young Child 1991;4(1):68e76.
Acton BV, Biggs WSG, Creighton DE, Penner KAH, Switzer HN, Thomas JHP, et al. Overestimating neurodevelopment using the Bayley-III after early complex cardiac surgery Pediatrics 2011; 128: e794–e800.
Anderson PJ, De Luca CR, Hutchinson E, Roberts G, Doyle LW. Underestimation of developmental delay by the new Bayley-III scale. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine 2010; 164 :352–356
Esteban FJ, Padilla N, Sanz-Cortés M, Miras JRd, Bargalló N, Villoslada P, et al. Fractal-dimension analysis detects cerebral changes in preterm infants with and without intrauterine growth restriction. NeuroImage 2010; 53:1225–1232
Makrides M, Gibson RA, McPhee AJ, Yelland L, Quinlivan J, Ryan P. Effect of DHA supplementation during pregnancy on maternal depression and neurodevelopment of young children: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association 2010; 304:1675–1683.
Moore T, Johnson S, Haider S, Hennessy E, Marlow N. Relationship between test scores using the second and third editions of the Bayley scales in extremely preterm children. Journal of Pediatrics 2012;160 :553–558.
Reuner G, Fields AC, Wittke A, Lopprich M, Pietz J. Comparison of the developmental tests Bayley-III and Bayley-II in 7-month-old infants born preterm. European Journal of Pediatrics 2013;172 :393–400.
Robertson C, Hendson L, Biggs W, Acton B. Application of the flynn effect for the Bayley-III scales. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine 2010;164: 1072–73.
Spittle AJ, Anderson PJ, Lee KJ, Ferretti C, Eeles A, Orton J, et al. Preventive care at home for very preterm infants improves infant and caregiver outcomes at 2 years. Pediatrics 2010;126 :e171–78.
Vohr BR, Stephens BE, Higgins RD, Bann CM, Hintz SR, Das A, et al. Are outcomes of extremely preterm infants improving? Impact of Bayley assessment on outcomes. The Journal of Pediatrics 2012; 161: 222–8.
- Abstract Viewed: 224 times
- PDF Downloaded: 119 times