Iranian Center for Endodontic Research
  • Login
  • Register

Iranian Endodontic Journal

  • Register
  • Home
  • About the journal
  • Issues
    • Current
    • Archives
  • For Authors/Reviewers
    • Submissions
    • Author Guidelines
    • Ethics Policy
    • Editorial & Peer Review Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Reviewers Information
  • Indexing/Abstracting
  • Editorial Team
  • Announcements
  • Contact Us
  • Congress Proceedings
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 19 No. 3 (2024): Summer 2024
  4. Original Article

Vol. 19 No. 3 (2024)

June 2024

Comparing the Efficiency of Single versus Dual Ultrasonic Devices for Metallic Post Removal in Endodontic Retreatment: A Clinical Study

  • Key Fabiano Souza Pereira
  • Lia Beatriz Junqueira-Verardo
  • Edilson José Zafalon
  • Luiz Fernando Tomazinho
  • Vanessa Rodrigues do Nascimento
  • Hugo José Santos Bastos
  • Alex Yoshiharu Otani

Iranian Endodontic Journal, Vol. 19 No. 3 (2024), 26 June 2024 , Page 189-192
https://doi.org/10.22037/iej.v19i3.41817 Published: 2024-06-26

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Introduction: Ultrasonic vibration for metallic post removal seems to be a unanimous choice between endodontists and general practitioners for providing the best results and having the highest safety. This study compared the time required by ultrasonic vibration for removing metallic post (MP) when 1 or 2 ultrasonics devices are used. Materials and Methods: One hundred and fifteen teeth with MPs from 105 patients, indicated for nonsurgical endodontic retreatment were divided into 2 groups according to the number of ultrasonic devices used (G1-1 device) and (G2-2 devices). In G1, the MP was worn with a transmetal bur, alongside the wear of the cement line (around 2 mm deep). Then, an ultrasonic tip attached to an ultrasonic unit, with a power of 100% was activated at the level of the post, with constant water spray at a level of 1 mm above the axial surface of the tooth. The position of the tip was changed between buccal and lingual surfaces every 10 seconds until the MP was removed. In G2 the same procedures were performed as described in G1, but two ultrasonic tips were activated simultaneously at buccal and lingual surfaces until the MP was removed. The vibration time necessary for removing each MP was recorded using a chronometer. Results: The mean time was 131.10±29.68 seconds (mean±standard error of the mean) for MP removal using one ultrasonic device, and 24.86±6.88 seconds for two devices. The time required for MP removal using two ultrasonic devices was significantly less than when using one ultrasonic device (P<0.001). Conclusion: The technique with 2 ultrasonic devices proved to be more efficient than the one using only 1 ultrasonic device.

  • PDF

How to Cite

1.
Pereira KFS, Junqueira-Verardo LB, Zafalon EJ, Tomazinho LF, Nascimento VR do, Bastos HJS, et al. Comparing the Efficiency of Single versus Dual Ultrasonic Devices for Metallic Post Removal in Endodontic Retreatment: A Clinical Study. Iran Endod J [Internet]. 2024 Jun. 26 [cited 2026 Jul. 8];19(3):189-92. Available from: https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/iej/article/view/41817
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX
  • Abstract Viewed: 190 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 223 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Make a Submission

Make a Submission

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Developed By

Open Journal Systems

Indexing/Abstracting

This journal is indexed in:

  • PubMed
  • Europe PMC
  • Scopus
  • SCImago
  • MIAR
  • CINAHL
  • CAS (Chemical Abstracts)
  • Dimensions
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • FATCAT
  • Google Scholar
  • IMEMR (Index Medicus for the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region)
  • Index Copernicus
  • ISC (Islamic World Science Citation Center)
  • Magiran
  • ROAD
  • SID (Scientific Information Database) 
  • SUDOC
  • UC Santa Barbara University
  • WIKIDATA
  • ZDB
    • This journal is Member of: COPE; ICMJ

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Browse

  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact

   Iranian Endodontic Journal is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).

Powered by OJSPlus