Iranian Endodontic Journal

References
1. Tziafas D. The future role of a molecular approach to pulp-dentinal regeneration. Caries Res. 2004;38(3):314-20.
2. Hilton TJ. Keys to clinical success with pulp capping: a review of the literature. Oper Dent. 2009;34(5):615-25.
3. Wunsch PB, Kuhnen MM, Best AM, Brickhouse TH. Retrospective study of the survival rates of indirect pulp therapy versus different pulpotomy medicaments. Pediatr Dent. 2016;38(5):406-11.
4. Godhi B, Tyagi R. Success rate of MTA pulpotomy on vital pulp of primary molars: a 3-year observational study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;9(3):222-7.
5. Fernandes AP, Neto NL, Marques NCT, Moretti ABS, Sakai VT, Silva TC, et al. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of the use of low-level laser therapy in vital pulp of primary teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2015;25(2):144-50.
6. Tuzuner T, Alacam A, Altunbas DA, Gokdogan FG, Gundogdu E. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of direct pulp capping therapy in primary molar teeth following haemostasis with various antiseptics: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2012;13(4):289-92.
7. Howley B, Seale NS, McWhorter AG, Kerins C, Boozer KB, Lindsey D. Pulpotomy versus pulpectomy for carious vital primary incisors: randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Dent. 2012;34(5):112-9.
8. Odabas ME, Alacam A, Sillelioglu H, Deveci C. Clinical and radiographic success rates of mineral trioxide aggregate and ferric sulphate pulpotomies performed by dental students. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2012;13(2):118-22.
9. Frenkel G, Kaufman A, Ashkenazi M. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of pulpotomized primary molars treated with white or gray mineral trioxide aggregate and ferric sulfate--long-term follow-up. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2012;37(2):137-41.
10. Caicedo R, Abbott PV, Alongi DJ, Alarcon MY. Clinical, radiographic and histological analysis of the effects of mineral trioxide aggregate used in direct pulp capping and pulpotomies of primary teeth. Aust Dent J. 2006;51(4):297-305.
11. Ghoddusi J, Forghani M, Parisay I. New approaches in vital pulp therapy in permanent teeth. Iran Endod J. 2014;9(1):15-22.
12. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Guideline on pulp therapy for primary and immature permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2016;38(6):280-8.
13. Fuks AB. Pulp therapy for the primary dentition. In: Pinkham JR, Casamassimo PS, Fields HWJ, McTigue DJ, Nowak A, editors. Pediatric Dentistry: Infancy Through Adolescence. 5th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier Saunders Co; 2013. p. 331-51.
14. McDonald RE, Avery DR, Dean JA. Treatment of Deep Caries, Vital Pulp Exposure, and Pulpless Teeth. In: Dean JA, Avery DR, McDonald RE, editors. McDonald and Avery's Dentistry for the Child and Adolescent. 9th ed. Missouri: Mosby Elseveir; 2011. p. 428-54.
15. Trairatvorakul C, Sastararuji T. Indirect pulp treatment vs antibiotic sterilization of deep caries in mandibular primary molars. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2014;24(1):23-31.
16. Hashem D, Mannocci F, Patel S, Manoharan A, Brown JE, Watson TF, et al. Clinical and radiographic assessment of the efficacy of calcium silicate indirect pulp capping: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Dent Res. 2015;94(4):562-8.
17. Gruythuysen R, van Strijp G, Wu MK. Long-term survival of indirect pulp treatment performed in primary and permanent teeth with clinically diagnosed deep carious lesions. J Endod. 2010;36(9):1490-3.
18. Ricketts DN, Kidd EA, Innes N, Clarkson J. Complete or ultraconservative removal of decayed tissue in unfilled teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006(3):Cd003808.
19. Farooq NS, Coll JA, Kuwabara A, Shelton P. Success rates of formocresol pulpotomy and indirect pulp therapy in the treatment of deep dentinal caries in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2000;22(4):278-86.
20. Vij R, Coll JA, Shelton P, Farooq NS. Caries control and other variables associated with success of primary molar vital pulp therapy. Pediatr Dent. 2004;26(3):214-20.
21. Fang RR, Chang KY, Lin YT, Lin YJ. Comparison of long-term outcomes between ferric sulfate pulpotomy and indirect pulp therapy in primary molars. J Dent Sci. 2019;14(2):134-7.
22. Falster CA, Araujo FB, Straffon LH, Nor JE. Indirect pulp treatment: in vivo outcomes of an adhesive resin system vs calcium hydroxide for protection of the dentin-pulp complex. Pediatr Dent. 2002;24(3):241-8.
23. Al-Zayer MA, Straffon LH, Feigal RJ, Welch KB. Indirect pulp treatment of primary posterior teeth: a retrospective study. Pediatr Dent. 2003;25(1):29-36.
24. Buyukgural B, Cehreli ZC. Effect of different adhesive protocols vs calcium hydroxide on primary tooth pulp with different remaining dentin thicknesses:24-month results. Clin Oral Investig. 2008;12(1):91-6.
25. Rosenberg L, Atar M, Daronch M, Honig A, Chey M, Funny MD, et al. Observational: prospective study of indirect pulp treatment in primary molars using resin-modified glass ionomer and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate: a 12-month follow-up. Pediatr Dent. 2013;35(1):13-7.
26. Boddeda KR, Rani CR, Vanga NRV, Chandrabhatla SK. Comparative evaluation of biodentine, 2% chlorhexidine with RMGIC and calcium hydroxide as indirect pulp capping materials in primary molars: An in vivo study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2019;37(1):60-6.
27. Lutfi AN, Kannan TP, Fazliah MN, Jamaruddin MA, Saidi J. Proliferative activity of cells from remaining dental pulp in response to treatment with dental materials. Aust Dent J. 2010;55(1):79-85.
28. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Reference manual guideline on pulp therapy for primary and immature permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2015;37(6):244-52.
29. Fuks AB. Vital pulp therapy with new materials for primary teeth: new directions and treatment perspectives. Pediatr Dent. 2008;30(3):211-9.
30. Marques MS, Wesselink PR, Shemesh H. Outcome of direct pulp capping with mineral trioxide aggregate: a prospective study. J Endod. 2015;41(7):1026-31.
31. Aminabadi NA, Farahani RMZ, Oskouei SG. Formocresol versus calcium hydroxide direct pulp capping of human primary molars: two year follow-up. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2010;34(4):317-21.
32. Fallahinejad Ghajari M, Asgharian Jeddi T, Iri S, Asgary S. Direct pulp-capping with calcium enriched mixture in primary molar teeth: a randomized clinical trial. Iran Endod J. 2010;5(1):27-30.
33. Ghajari MF, Jeddi TA, Iri S, Asgary S. Direct pulp-capping with calcium enriched mixture in primary molar teeth: a randomized clinical trial. Iran Endod J. 2010;5(1):27-30.
34. Kotsanos N, Arapostathis KN, Arhakis A, Menexes G. Direct pulp capping of carious primary molars. A specialty practice based study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2014;38(4):307-12.
35. Ulusoy AT, Bayrak S, Bodrumlu EH. Clinical and radiological evaluation of calcium sulfate as direct pulp capping material in primary teeth. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2014;15(2):127-31.
36. Asl Aminabadi N, Satrab S, Najafpour E, Samiei M, Jamali Z, Shirazi S. A randomized trial of direct pulp capping in primary molars using MTA compared to 3Mixtatin: a novel pulp capping biomaterial. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2016;26(4):281-90.
37. Magnusson B. Therapeutic pulpotomy in primary molars-clinical and histological follow-up. I. Calcium hydroxide paste as wound dressing. Odontol Revy. 1970;21(4):415-31.
38. Kennedy DB, Kapala JT. The dental pulp: biological considerations of protection and treatment. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1985. p. 237-243.
39. Schwendicke F, Brouwer F, Schwendicke A, Paris S. Different materials for direct pulp capping: systematic review and meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2016;20(6):1121-32.
40. Garrocho-Rangel A, Esparza-Villalpando V, Pozos-Guillen A. Outcomes of direct pulp capping in vital primary teeth with cariously and non-cariously exposed pulp: A systematic review. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2020;30(5):536-46.
41. Cehreli ZC, Turgut M, Olmez S, Dagdeviren A, Atilla P. Short term human primary pulpal response after direct pulp capping with fourth-generation dentin adhesives. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2000;25(1):65-71.
42. Walker LA, Sanders BJ, Jones JE, Williamson CA, Dean JA, Legan JJ, et al. Current trends in pulp therapy: a survey analyzing pulpotomy techniques taught in pediatric dental residency programs. J Dent Child (Chic). 2013;80(1):31-5.
43. Myers DR, Pashley DH, Whitford GM, Sobel RE, McKinney RV. The acute toxicity of high doses of systemically administered formocresol in dogs. Pediatr Dent. 1981;3(1):37-41.
44. Myers DR, Shoaf HK, Dirksen TR, Pashley DH, Whitford GM, Reynolds KE. Distribution of 14C-formaldehyde after pulpotomy with formocresol. J Am Dent Assoc. 1978;96(5):805-13.
45. Pashley EL, Myers DR, Pashley DH, Whitford GM. Systemic distribution of 14C-formaldehyde from formocresol-treated pulpotomy sites. J Dent Res. 1980;59(3):602-8.
46. Kahl J, Easton J, Johnson G, Zuk J, Wilson S, Galinkin J. Formocresol blood levels in children receiving dental treatment under general anesthesia. Pediatr Dent. 2008;30(5):393-9.
47. Bagrizan M, Pourgolshani P, Hosseinpour S, Jalalpour G, Shahrestani MZ. Plasma level formaldehyde in children receiving pulpotomy treatment under general anesthesia. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2017;41(2):95-101.
48. Fuks AB, Bimstein E, Guelmann M, Klein H. Assessment of a 2 percent buffered glutaraldehyde solution in pulpotomized primary teeth of schoolchildren. ASDC J Dent Child. 1990;57(5):371-5.
49. Fei AL, Udin RD, Johnson R. A clinical study of ferric sulfate as a pulpotomy agent in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent. 1991;13(6):327-32.
50. Fuks AB, Holan G, Davis JM, Eidelman E. Ferric sulfate versus dilute formocresol in pulpotomized primary molars: long-term follow up. Pediatr Dent. 1997;19(5):327-30.
51. Ibricevic H, al-Jame Q. Ferric sulfate as pulpotomy agent in primary teeth: twenty month clinical follow-up. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2000;24(4):269-72.
52. Eidelman E, Holan G, Fuks AB. Mineral trioxide aggregate vs formocresol in pulpotomized primary molars: a preliminary report. Pediatr Dent. 2001;23(1):15-8.
53. Dean JA, Mack RB, Fulkerson BT, Sanders BJ. Comparison of electrosurgical and formocresol pulpotomy procedures in children. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2002;12(3):177-82.
54. Holan G, Fuks AB, Ketlz N. Success rate of formocresol pulpotomy in primary molars restored with stainless steel crown vs amalgam. Pediatr Dent. 2002;24(3):212-6.
55. Ibricevic H, Al-Jame Q. Ferric sulphate and formocresol in pulpotomy of primary molars: long term follow-up study. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2003;4(1):28-32.
56. Farsi N, Alamoudi N, Balto K, Mushayt A. Success of mineral trioxide aggregate in pulpotomized primary molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2005;29(4):307-11.
57. Holan G, Eidelman E, Fuks AB. Long-term evaluation of pulpotomy in primary molars using mineral trioxide aggregate or formocresol. Pediatr Dent. 2005;27(2):129-36.
58. Huth KC, Paschos E, Hajek-Al-Khatar N, Hollweck R, Crispin A, Hickel R, et al. Effectiveness of 4 pulpotomy techniques-randomized controlled trial. J Dent Res. 2005;84(12):1144-8.
59. Markovic D, Zivojinovic V, Vucetic M. Evaluation of three pulpotomy medicaments in primary teeth. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2005;6(3):133-8.
60. Vargas KG, Packham B. Radiographic success of ferric sulfate and formocresol pulpotomies in relation to early exfoliation. Pediatr Dent. 2005;27(3):233-7.
61. Vargas KG, Packham B, Lowman D. Preliminary evaluation of sodium hypochlorite for pulpotomies in primary molars. Pediatr Dent. 2006;28(6):511-7.
62. Sabbarini J, Mohamed A, Wahba N, El-Meligy O, Dean J. Comparison of enamel matrix derivative versus formocresol as pulpotomy agents in the primary dentition. J Endod. 2008;34(3):284-7.
63. Sonmez D, Sari S, Cetinbas T. A comparison of four pulpotomy techniques in primary molars: a long-term follow-up. J Endod. 2008;34(8):950-5.
64. Zurn D, Seale NS. Light-cured calcium hydroxide vs formocresol in human primary molar pulpotomies: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Dent. 2008;30(1):34-41.
65. Moretti AB, Sakai VT, Oliveira TM, Fornetti AP, Santos CF, Machado MA, et al. The effectiveness of mineral trioxide aggregate, calcium hydroxide and formocresol for pulpotomies in primary teeth. Int Endod J. 2008;41(7):547-55.
66. Trairatvorakul C, Chunlasikaiwan S. Success of pulpectomy with zinc oxide-eugenol vs calcium hydroxide/iodoform paste in primary molars: a clinical study. Pediatr Dent. 2008;30(4):303-8.
67. Sonmez D, Duruturk L. Success rate of calcium hydroxide pulpotomy in primary molars restored with amalgam and stainless steel crowns. Br Dent J. 2010;208(9):E18; discussion 408-9.
68. Erdem AP, Guven Y, Balli B, Ilhan B, Sepet E, Ulukapi I, et al. Success rates of mineral trioxide aggregate, ferric sulfate, and formocresol pulpotomies: a 24-month study. Pediatr Dent. 2011;33(2):165-70.
69. Kurji ZA, Sigal MJ, Andrews P, Titley K. A retrospective study of a modified 1-minute formocresol pulpotomy technique part 1: clinical and radiographic findings. Pediatr Dent. 2011;33(2):131-8.
70. Nematollahi H, Sahebnasagh M, Parisay I. Comparison of electrosurgical pulpotomy with zinc oxide eugenol or zinc polycarboxylate cements sub-base. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011;36(2):133-7.
71. Airen P, Shigli A, Airen B. Comparative evaluation of formocresol and mineral trioxide aggregate in pulpotomized primary molars-2 year follow up. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2012;37(2):143-7.
72. Ruby JD, Cox CF, Mitchell SC, Makhija S, Chompu-Inwai P, Jackson J. A randomized study of sodium hypochlorite versus formocresol pulpotomy in primary molar teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2013;23(2):145-52.
73. Shabzendedar M, Mazhari F, Alami M, Talebi M. Sodium hypochlorite vs formocresol as pulpotomy medicaments in primary molars: 1-year follow-up. Pediatr Dent. 2013;35(4):329-32.
74. Akcay M, Sari S. The effect of sodium hypochlorite application on the success of calcium hydroxide and mineral trioxide aggregate pulpotomies in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2014;36(4):316-21.
75. Farsi DJ, El-Khodary HM, Farsi NM, El Ashiry EA, Yagmoor MA, Alzain SM. Sodium hypochlorite versus formocresol and ferric sulfate pulpotomies in primary molars: 18-month follow-up. Pediatr Dent. 2015;37(7):535-40.
76. Yildirim C, Basak F, Akgun OM, Polat GG, Altun C. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of the effectiveness of formocresol, mineral trioxide aggregate, Portland cement, and enamel matrix derivative in primary teeth pulpotomies: a two year follow-up. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;40(1):14-20.
77. Junqueira MA, Cunha NNO, Caixeta FF, Marques NCT, Oliveira TM, Moretti ABS, et al. Clinical, Radiographic and Histological Evaluation of Primary Teeth Pulpotomy Using MTA And Ferric Sulfate. Braz Dent J. 2018;29(2):159-65.
78. Lin PY, Chen HS, Wang YH, Tu YK. Primary molar pulpotomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Dent. 2014;42(9):1060-77.
79. Stringhini Junior E, Vitcel ME, Oliveira LB. Evidence of pulpotomy in primary teeth comparing MTA, calcium hydroxide, ferric sulphate, and electrosurgery with formocresol. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2015;16(4):303-12.
80. Smail-Faugeron V, Courson F, Durieux P, Muller-Bolla M, Glenny AM, Fron Chabouis H. Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014(8):Cd003220.
81. Elkhadem A, Sami I. No clear evidence of superiority regarding pulp medicaments in primary molars. Evid Based Dent. 2014;15(4):100-1.
82. Fuks AB. Current concepts in vital primary pulp therapy. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2002;3(3):115-20.
83. Guelmann M, Bookmyer KL, Villalta P, Garcia-Godoy F. Microleakage of restorative techniques for pulpotomized primary molars. J Dent Child (Chic). 2004;71(3):209-11.
84. Guelmann M, Fair J, Bimstein E. Permanent versus temporary restorations after emergency pulpotomies in primary molars. Pediatr Dent. 2005;27(6):478-81.
85. Coll JA, Seale NS, Vargas K, Marghalani AA, Al Shamali S, Graham L. Primary tooth vital pulp therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Dent. 2017;39(1):16-27.
86. El-Meligy O, Abdalla M, El-Baraway S, El-Tekya M, Dean JA. Histological evaluation of electrosurgery and formocresol pulpotomy techniques in primary teeth in dogs. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2001;26(1):81-5.
87. Cleaton-Jones P, Duggal M, Parak M, William S, Setze S. Ferric sulphate and formocresol pulpotomies in baboon primary molars: histological responses. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2002;3(3):121-5.
88. Holan G, Fuks AB. A comparison of pulpectomies using ZOE and KRI paste in primary molars: a retrospective study. Pediatr Dent. 1993;15(6):403-7.
89. Sadrian R, Coll JA. A long-term followup on the retention rate of zinc oxide eugenol filler after primary tooth pulpectomy. Pediatr Dent. 1993;15(4):249-53.
90. Coll JA, Sadrian R. Predicting pulpectomy success and its relationship to exfoliation and succedaneous dentition. Pediatr Dent. 1996;18(1):57-63.
91. Ramar K, Mungara J. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of pulpectomies using three root canal filling materials: an in-vivo study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2010;28(1):25-9.
92. Subramaniam P, Gilhotra K. Endoflas, zinc oxide eugenol and metapex as root canal filling materials in primary molars-a comparative clinical study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011;35(4):365-9.
93. Rewal N, Thakur AS, Sachdev V, Mahajan N. Comparison of endoflas and zinc oxide eugenol as root canal filling materials in primary dentition. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2014;32(4):317-21.
94. Pramila R, Muthu MS, Deepa G, Farzan JM, Rodrigues SJL. Pulpectomies in primary mandibular molars: a comparison of outcomes using three root filling materials. Int Endod J. 2016;49(5):413-21.
95. Pandranki J, Vanga NRV, Chandrabhatla SK. Zinc oxide eugenol and Endoflas pulpectomy in primary molars: 24-month clinical and radiographic evaluation. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2018;36(2):173-80.
96. Nurko C, Garcia-Godoy F. Evaluation of a calcium hydroxide/iodoform paste (Vitapex) in root canal therapy for primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1999;23(4):289-94.
97. Coll JA, Dhar V, Vargas K, Chen CY, Crystal YO, AlShamali S, et al. Use of Non-Vital Pulp Therapies in Primary Teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2020;42(5):337-49.
98. Coll JA, Vargas K, Marghalani AA, Chen CY, AlShamali S, Dhar V, et al. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Nonvital Pulp Therapy for Primary Teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2020;42(4):256-461.
99. Sahebalam R, Sarraf A, Abdollahi M, Jafarzadeh H, Rajati H, Patil S. Evaluation of the effect of using electrosurgery in pulpectomy of deciduous teeth on succedaneous teeth: an animal study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2015;16(3):183-6.
100. Guelmann M, McEachern M, Turner C. Pulpectomies in primary incisors using three delivery systems: an in vitro study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2004;28(4):323-6.
101. Memarpour M, Shahidi S, Meshki R. Comparison of different obturation techniques for primary molars by digital radiography. Pediatr Dent. 2013;35(3):236-40.
102. Hendry JA, Jeansonne BG, Dummett CO, Jr., Burrell W. Comparison of calcium hydroxide and zinc oxide and eugenol pulpectomies in primary teeth of dogs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1982;54(4):445-51.
103. Cleaton-Jones P, Duggal M, Parak R, Williams S, Setzer S. Zinc oxide-eugenol and calcium hydroxide pulpectomies in baboon primary molars: histological responses. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2004;5(3):131-5.
104. Raslan N, Wetzel WE. Exposed human pulp caused by trauma and/or caries in primary dentition: a histological evaluation. Dent Traumatol. 2006;22(3):145-53.
105. Anila B, Murali H, Cheranjeevi J, Kapil RS. Lesion sterilization and tissue repair (LSTR): a review. J Scient Dent. 2014;4(2):49-55.
106. Sato I, Ando-Kurihara N, Kota K, Iwaku M, Hoshino E. Sterilization of infected root-canal dentine by topical application of a mixture of ciprofloxacin, metronidazole and minocycline in situ. Int Endod J. 1996;29(2):118-24.
107. Takushige T, Cruz EV, Asgor Moral A, Hoshino E. Endodontic treatment of primary teeth using a combination of antibacterial drugs. Int Endod J. 2004;37(2):132-8.
108. Nanda R, Koul M, Srivastava S, Upadhyay V, Dwivedi R. Clinical evaluation of 3 Mix and Other Mix in non-instrumental endodontic treatment of necrosed primary teeth. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2014;4(2):114-9.
109. Doneria D, Thakur S, Singhal P, Chauhan D, Keshav K, Uppal A. In search of a novel substitute: clinical and radiological success of lesion sterilization and tissue repair with modified 3Mix-MP antibiotic paste and conventional pulpectomy for primary molars with pulp involvement with 18 months follow-up. Contemp Clin Dent. 2017;8(4):514-21.