Simulated Evaluation of Tooth Fracture Resistance during Instrumentation with Single-and Multi-file Rotary Systems
Iranian Endodontic Journal,
Vol. 16 No. 4 (2021),
13 Mehr 2021
,
Page 232-237
https://doi.org/10.22037/iej.v16i4.33882
Abstract
Introduction: Use of rotary files in root canal preparation is inevitable due to their high speed and reduced duration of treatment. However, microcracks and even root fracture may sometimes occur in teeth where canal(s) is/are prepared using these devices. The purpose of the current study was to compare NeoNiti single-file with RaCe multi-file rotary systems. Materials and Methods: An accurate scanner designed detailed three-dimensional file models, and a simulated model was developed using canal-specific features; including dentin thickness, root canal length, taper rate and root canal curvature. Cleaning and shaping conditions were simulated with appropriate speed and crack conditions for both types of files on the computer. Strain accumulation sites in the root dentin wall where microcracks was likely to occur were simulated and investigated. Abaqus and ANSYS software were used to perform finite element simulations. Results: RaCe files with 0.04 taper caused the lowest level of stress (34.33 MPa) to the simulated canal. Conversely, the highest level of stress (62.35 MPa) was applied by 8% NeoNiti file to the simulated canal. Conclusions: Based on the present experimental study, it can be concluded that RaCe multi-file rotary system may better be used in endodontic therapy, and the risk of microcracks in the tooth wall is less than that of NeoNiti single-file rotary system.
- Instrumentation; Rotary System; Simulation; Tooth Fracture
How to Cite
References
2. Mokhtari H, Niknami M, Sohrabi A, Habibivand E, Zonouzi HRM, Rahimi S, et al. Cone-beam computed tomography comparison of canal transportation after preparation with BioRaCe and Mtwo rotary instruments and hand K-Flexofiles. . Iranian endodontic journal 2014;9(3):180.
3. Bürklein S, Hinschitza K, Dammaschke T, E. S. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single‐file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper. International endodontic journal 2012;45(5):449-61.
4. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Vieira MV, Vieira VT, de Souza LC, AL. dS. Influence of surface roughness on the fatigue life of nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments. . Journal of endodontics 2016;42(6):965-8.
5. Yoldas O, Yilmaz S, Atakan G, Kuden C, Z. K. Dentinal microcrack formation during root canal preparations by different NiTi rotary instruments and the self-adjusting file. . Journal of endodontics. 2012;38(2):232-5.
6. Wilcox LR, Roskelley C, T. S. The relationship of root canal enlargement to finger-spreader induced vertical root fracture. . Journal of Endodontics 1997;23(8):533-4.
7. Ashwinkumar V, Krithikadatta J, Surendran S, N. V. Effect of reciprocating file motion on microcrack formation in root canals: an SEM study. . International endodontic journal 2014;47(7):622-7.
8. Karamifar K, Mehrasa N, Pardis P, MA. S. Cleanliness of Canal Walls following Gutta-Percha Removal with Hand Files, RaCe and RaCe plus XP-Endo Finisher Instruments: A Photographic in Vitro Analysis. . Iranian endodontic journal 2017;2012(2):242-7.
9. Aminsobhani M, Ghorbanzadeh A, Dehghan S, Niasar AN, MJ. K. A comparison of canal preparations by Mtwo and RaCe rotary files using full sequenceversus one rotary file techniques; a cone-beam computed tomography analysis. . Saudi Endodontic Journal 2014;4(2):70.
10. Pedullà E, Grande NM, Plotino G, Gambarini G, E. R. Influence of continuous or reciprocating motion on cyclic fatigue resistance of 4 different nickel-titanium rotary instruments. . Journal of endodontics 2013;39(2):258-61.
11. Ferraz C, Gomes N, Gomes B, Zaia A, Teixeira F, F. SF. Apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using two hand and three engine‐driven instrumentation techniques. . International endodontic journal 2001;34(5):354-8.
12. Vaudt J, Bitter K, Neumann K, A. K. Ex vivo study on root canal instrumentation of two rotary nickel–titanium systems in comparison to stainless steel hand instruments. . International endodontic journal 2009;42(1):22-33.
13. Walia H, Brantley WA, H. G. An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. . Journal of endodontics 1988;14(7):346-51.
14. H. S. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. . Dent Clin North Am 1974;18:269-96.
15. Alapati SB, Brantley WA, Svec TA, Powers JM, JC. M. Scanning electron microscope observations of new and usednickel-titanium rotary files. . Journal of Endodontics 2003;29(10):667-9.
16. De‐Deus G, Moreira E, Lopes H, C. E. Extended cyclic fatigue life of F2 ProTaper instruments used in reciprocating movement. . International endodontic journal 2010;43(12):1063-8.
17. G. Y. Canal preparation using only one Ni‐Ti rotary instrument: preliminary observations. . International endodontic journal 2008;41(4):339-44.
18. You S-Y, Bae K-S, Baek S-H, Kum K-Y, Shon W-J, W. L. Lifespan of one nickel-titanium rotary file with reciprocating motion in curved root canals. . Journal of Endodontics 2010;36(2):1991-4.
19. Vadhana S, SaravanaKarthikeyan B, Nandini S, N. V. Cyclic fatigue resistance of RaCe and Mtwo rotary files in continuous rotation and reciprocating motion. . Journal of endodontics 2014;40(7):995-9.
20. Eken R, Sen OG, Eskitascioglu G, S. B. Evaluation of the effect of rotary systems on stresses in a new testing model using a 3-dimensional printed simulated resin root with an oval-shaped canal: a finite element analysis study. Journal of endodontics 2016;42(8):1273-8.
21. KimH-C, Kim H-J, Lee C-J, Kim B-M, Park J-K, A. V. Mechanical response of nickel–titanium instruments with different cross‐sectional designs during shaping of simulated curved canals. . International Endodontic Journal 2009;42(7):593-602.
22. Lertchirakarn V, Palamara JE, HH. M. Load and strain during lateral condensation and vertical root fracture. . Journal of endodontics 1999;25(2):99-104.
23. Tavanafar S, Karimpour A, Karimpour H, Saleh AM, MH. S. Effect of different instrumentation techniqueson vertical root fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. Journal of Dentistry 2015;16(1):50.
24. Nikkerdar N, Hatam R, Shahsavand L, A. K. The comparison of the rate of apical displacement in curved root canals using Neoniti and RaCe files by cone beam CT Scan. . Brazilian Dental Science 2019;22(3):313-20.
25. Çiçek E, Koçak MM, Sağlam BC, S. K. Evaluation of microcrack formation in root canals after instrumentation with different NiTi rotary file systems: a scanning electron microscopy study. Scanning 2015;37(1):49-53.
- Abstract Viewed: 352 times
- PDF Downloaded: 246 times