Comparison of Two Reciprocating and Anatomical Single File Techniques in Cleaning Oval Anatomies
Iranian Endodontic Journal,
Vol. 18 No. 1 (2023),
17 January 2023
,
Page 41-46
https://doi.org/10.22037/iej.v18i1.33623
Abstract
Introduction: The present study aimed to compare the capability of two single-file shaping systems in disinfecting and cleaning long oval root canals. Materials and Methods: Fifty single-rooted teeth were prepared, contaminated with Enterococcus faecalis and divided into two groups. Two samplings were obtained; S1 before chemo-mechanical preparation and S2 after the preparation. Depending on the group, chemo-mechanical preparation was performed with XP-endo Shaper (XPS) and Wave One Gold (WOG). Five teeth from each group were observed under scanning electron microscopy (1000×) to evaluate the cleanliness of root canals at 3, 6 and 9 mm from the apex. All probability (P-values) were two-tailed, statistical significance was set at 0.05 and analyses were conducted using SPSS statistical software. Results: A significant reduction in the colony forming units was observed from S1 to S2 in both tested groups. In S2, XPS group obtained significantly lower colony forming units (P<0.001). In the cleanliness study, XPS group resulted in significantly cleaner canals compared to WOG. Conclusions: Based on this in vitro study XPS system was more effective in disinfecting and cleaning long oval canals.
- Anatomical Instruments; Oval Canals; Reciprocating; Wave One Gold; XP-endo Shaper
How to Cite
References
2. Sundqvist G. Endodontic treatment of apical periodontitis. In: Orstavik D, Ford TRP, eds. Essential endodontology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Science; 1998. pp. 242–77.
3. Schilder H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent ClinNorthAm 1974; 18: 269–96.
4. Wu MK, Wesselink PR. A primary observation on the preparation and obturation of oval canals. Int Endod J 2001; 34: 137–41.
5. Mauger MJ, Waite RM, Alexander JB, et al. Ideal endodontic access in mandibular incisors. J Endod 1999; 25: 206–7.
6. Paque F, Balmer M, Attin T, et al. Preparation of oval-shaped root canals in mandibular molars using nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a micro-computed tomography study. J Endod 2010; 36: 703–7.
7. Peters OA, Laib A, Gohring TN, et al. Changes in root canal geometry after preparation assessed by high-resolution computed tomography. J Endod 2001; 27: 1–6.
8. Lacerda MF, Marceliano-Alves MF, Perez AR et al. Cleaning and shaping oval canals with 3 instrumentation systems: a correlative micro–computed tomographic and histologic study. J Endod 2017; 43, 1878–84.
9. Ozyurek T, Gundo_gar M, Uslu G et al. Cyclic fatigue resistances of Hyflex EDM, WaveOne gold, Reciproc blue and 2shape NiTi rotary files in different artificial canals. Odontology 2018; 106: 408–413
10. Silva EJNL, Vieira VTL, Belladonna FG et al. Cyclic and torsional fatigue resistance of XP-endo shaper and TRUShape instruments. J Endod 2018; 44, 168–72.
11. Metzger Z, Teperovich E, Zary R, Cohen R, Hof R. The self-adjusting file (SAF). Part 1: respecting the root canal anatomy—a new concept of endodontic files and its implementation. J Endod 2010; 36: 679–90.
12. Paqué F, Peters OA. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of the preparation of long oval root canals in mandibular molars with the self-adjusting file. J Endod 2011; 37: 517–21.
13. Krokidis A, Bonfanti C, Cerutti A, Barabanti N, Zinelis S, Panopoulos P. Comparative analysis of SAF, Protaper next and BT-Race in eliminating Enterococcus faecalis from long oval canals: an ex vivo study. Aust Endod J 2017; 43:110–114.
14. Alves FR, Rôças IN, Almeida BM, Neves MA, Zoffoli J, Siqueira JF. Quantitative molecular and culture analyses of bacterial elimination in oval-shaped root canals by a single-file instrumentation technique. Int Endod J 2012; 45: 871–7.
15. Tay FR, Gu LS, Schoeffel GJ, et al. Effect of vapor lock on root canal debridement by using a side-vented needle for positive-pressure irrigant delivery. J Endod 2010; 36: 745–50.
16. American Association of Endodontists' Glossary of Endodontic Terms, 2012
17. Bechelli C, Zecchi Orlandini S, Colafranceschi M. Scanning electron microscope study on the efficacy of root canal wall debridement of hand versus Lightspeed instrumentation. Int Endod J. 1999 Nov;32(6):484-93.
18. Azim AA, Piasecki L, da Silva Neto UX, Cruz ATG, Azim KA. XP Shaper, A novel adaptive core rotary instrument: micro-computed tomographic analysis of its shaping abilities. J Endod. 2017; 43: 1532–1538.
19. Krokidis A, Bonfanti C, Barabanti N, Panopoulos P. Rotary versus reciprocating shaping files in bacterial elimination from long oval canals. Aust Endod J 2018; 44: 240–244.
20. Siqueira JF Jr, Alves FR, Almeida BM, de Oliveira JC, R^ocas IN. Ability of chemomechanical preparation with either rotary instruments or self-adjusting file to disinfect oval-shaped root canals. J Endod 2010; 36: 1860–5.
21. Alves FR, Almeida BM, Neves MA, Moreno JO, R^ocas IN, Siqueira JF. Disinfecting oval-shaped root canals: effectiveness of different supplementary approaches. J Endod 2011; 37: 496–501.
22. Alves FR, R^ocas IN, Almeida BM, Neves MA, Zoffoli J, Siqueira JF. Quantitative molecular and culture analyses of bacterial elimination in oval-shaped root canals by a single-file instrumentation technique. Int Endod J 2012; 45: 871–7.
23. Siqueira JF Jr, Alves FR, Almeida BM, de Oliveira JC, Rôças IN. Ability of chemomechanical preparation with either rotary instruments or self-adjusting file to disinfect oval-shaped root canals. J Endod 2010; 36: 1860–5.
24. Machado MEL, Sapia LAB, Cai S, Martins GHR, Nabeshima CK. Comparison of two rotary systems in root canal preparation regarding disinfection. J Endod 2010; 36: 1238–40.
25. Sakamoto M, Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN, Benno Y. Bacterial reduction and persistence after endodontic treatment procedures. Oral Microbiol Immunol 2007; 22: 19–23.
26. Aydin C, Tunca YM, Senses Z, Baysallar M, Kayaoglu G, Ørstavik D. Bacterial reduction by extensive versus conservative root canal instrumentation in vitro. Acta Odontol Scand 2007; 65: 167–70.
27. Gorduysus M, Nagas E, Torun OY, Gorduysus O. A comparison of three rotary systems and hand instrumentation technique for the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis from the root canal. Aust Endod J 2011; 37: 128–33.
28. Üreyen Kaya B, Erik CE, Sesli Çetin E, Köle M, Maden M. Mechanical reduction in intracanal Enterococcus faecalis when using three different single-file systems: an ex vivo comparative study. Int Endod J. 2019;52(1):77-85.
- Abstract Viewed: 270 times
- PDF Downloaded: 281 times