Iranian Endodontic Journal

Vol. 16 No. 2 (2021)

A Maxillary Second Premolar with Four Canals: A Case Report

Iranian Endodontic Journal, Vol. 16 No. 2 (2021), 16 March 2021 , Page 127-130
https://doi.org/10.22037/iej.v16i2.30526

Abstract

Profound knowledge of the internal anatomy and configuration of the teeth plays a pivotal role in the success of standard root canal treatment. The presence of unexpected extra root canals has been reported in all the teeth, making root canal treatment a challenge for every clinician. Although the maxillary second premolar is no exception to this rule, the presence of a variety of multiple canals is relatively rare. In fact, the presence of three separate root canals has been reported in only 1-6% of cases. A 33-year-old male was referred for root canal retreatment of his left maxillary second premolar. An intraoral periapical radiograph revealed previous substandard endodontic treatment. Retreatment was performed under an operating microscope, and four root canals were found, which is, in fact, very rare. This case highlights another variation in the morphology of such teeth and it does highlight the importance of using magnification, especially an operating microscope in endodontic treatment.

Keywords:
  • Anatomical Variations; Dental Operating Microscope; Maxillary Second Premolar

How to Cite

1.
Karamifar K, Tondari A. A Maxillary Second Premolar with Four Canals: A Case Report. Iran Endod J [Internet]. 2021 Mar. 14 [cited 2026 Jul. 8];16(2):127-30. Available from: https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/iej/article/view/30526

References

Ida R, Gutmann J. Importance of anatomic variables in endodontic treatment outcomes: case report. Dent Traumatol. 1995;11(4):199-203.

Lin LM, Pascon EA, Skribner J, Gängler P, Langeland K. Clinical, radiographic, and histologic study of endodontic treatment failures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1991;71(5):603-11.

Ricucci D, Siqueira Jr JF. Anatomic and microbiologic challenges to achieving success with endodontic treatment: a case report. J Endod. 2008;34(10):1249-54.

Slowey R. Root canal anatomy: road map to successful endodontics. Dent Clin North Am. 1979;23:555-73.

Mittal S, Kumar T, Mittal S, Sharma J. Mandibular premolars with aberrant canal morphology: An endodontic challenge. J Conserv Dent. 2014;17(5):491.

Carns EJ, Skidmore A. Configurations and deviations of root canals of maxillary first premolars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1973;36(6):880-6.

Pécora JD, Saquy P, Sousa Neto M, Woelfel J. Root form and canal anatomy of maxillary first premolars. Braz Dent J. 1991;2(2):87-94.

Atieh MA. Root and canal morphology of maxillary first premolars in a Saudi population. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008;9(1):46-53.

Neelakantan P, Subbarao C, Ahuja R, Subbarao CV. Root and canal morphology of Indian maxillary premolars by a modified root canal staining technique. Odontol. 2011;99(1):18-21.

Tian YY, Guo B, Zhang R, Yu X, Wang H, Hu T, et al. Root and canal morphology of maxillary first premolars in a Chinese subpopulation evaluated using cone‐beam computed tomography. Int Endod J. 2012;45(11):996-1003.

Vertucci FJ. Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1984;58(5):589-99.

Lea C, Deblinger J, Machado R, Silva EJNL, Vansan LP. Maxillary premolar with 4 separate canals. J Endod. 2014;40(4):591-3.

Izaz S, Mandava P, Bolla N, Dasari B. Atypical anatomy of maxillary second premolar with three roots and four canals. J Conserv Dent. 2017;20(5):370.

Sachdeva GS, Ballal S, Gopikrishna V, Kandaswamy D. Endodontic management of a mandibular second premolar with four roots and four root canals with the aid of spiral computed tomography: a case report. J Endod. 2008;34(1):104-7.

Matherne RP, Angelopoulos C, Kulild JC, Tira D. Use of cone-beam computed tomography to identify root canal systems in vitro. J Endod. 2008;34(1):87-9.

Cotton TP, Geisler TM, Holden DT, Schwartz SA, Schindler WG. Endodontic applications of cone-beam volumetric tomography. J Endod. 2007;33(9):1121-32.

Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, White SC. Patient risk related to common dental radiographic examinations: the impact of 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations regarding dose calculation. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008;139(9):1237-43.

Carr GB, Murgel CA. The use of the operating microscope in endodontics. Dent Clin. 2010;54(2):191-214.

Paper ASCtDaMP. AAE Position Statement. Use of microscopes and other magnification techniques. J Endod. 2012;38(8):1153.

Silva E, Belladonna F, Zuolo A, Rodrigues E, Ehrhardt I, Souza E, et al. Effectiveness of XP‐endo Finisher and XP‐endo Finisher R in removing root filling remnants: a micro‐CT study. Int Endod J. 2018;51(1):86-91.

Karamifar K, Mehrasa N, Pardis P, Saghiri MA. Cleanliness of canal walls following gutta-percha removal with hand files, RaCe and RaCe plus XP-Endo finisher instruments: a photographic in vitro analysis. Iranian endodontic journal. 2017;12(2):242.

Bayram HM, Bayram E, Ocak M, Uygun AD, Celik HH. Effect of ProTaper Gold, Self-Adjusting File, and XP-endo Shaper instruments on dentinal microcrack formation: a micro–computed tomographic study. J Endod. 2017;43(7):1166-9.

  • Abstract Viewed: 525 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 366 times

Download Statastics

Make a Submission

Make a Submission

Information

Developed By

Open Journal Systems

Current Issue

Browse