Iranian Center for Endodontic Research
  • Login
  • Register

Iranian Endodontic Journal

  • Register
  • Home
  • About the journal
  • Issues
    • Current
    • Archives
  • For Authors/Reviewers
    • Submissions
    • Author Guidelines
    • Ethics Policy
    • Editorial & Peer Review Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Reviewers Information
  • Indexing/Abstracting
  • Editorial Team
  • Announcements
  • Contact Us
  • Congress Proceedings
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 15 No. 1 (2020): Winter 2020
  4. Original Article

Vol. 15 No. 1 (2020)

January 2020

Different Application Methods for Endoseal MTA Sealer: A Comparative Study

  • Fariborz Moazami
  • Mohammadhasan Naseri
  • Parastoo Malekzade

Iranian Endodontic Journal, Vol. 15 No. 1 (2020), 12 January 2020 , Page 44-49
https://doi.org/10.22037/iej.v15i1.27568 Published: 2020-01-12

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of present ex vivo study was to investigate the filling quality and voids, using Endoseal mineral trioxide aggregate (Endoseal MTA) with a single-cone technique with and without ultrasonic application and to compare these methods with lateral compaction technique. Methods and Materials: Thirty-six extracted human anterior single-root teeth were prepared and assigned to 3 groups: Group 1: EMS group was Endoseal MTA+ single-cone; Group 2: EMSU group was Endoseal MTA+ single-cone with ultrasonic activation; and Group 3: LC group was Endoseal MTA+ lateral condensation technique. Teeth were sectioned transversely in coronal, middle and apical of the teeth and the existence of voidsand their areas in the slices were measured and scored under a dental microscope. One-way analysis of variance and Post Hoc test were used for statistical analysis and also to detect any significance (α=0.05). Results: EMS group showed significantly more void area than lateral compaction group (P<0.05), but the difference between the EMSU group and the other two groups were not significant (P>0.05). Also, EMS group had significantly higher void score than the other two groups (P<0.017). Conclusion:  Endoseal MTA as a premixed calcium silicate sealer has a better performance when used with gutta-percha cone-mediated ultrasonic activation, so we suggest gentle ultrasonic activation for applying Endoseal MTA in the clinical use.

Keywords: Mineral Trioxide Aggregate; Root Canal Obturation; Root Canal Sealer; Ultrasonic

  • PDF

How to Cite

1.
Moazami F, Naseri M, Malekzade P. Different Application Methods for Endoseal MTA Sealer: A Comparative Study. Iran Endod J [Internet]. 2020 Jan. 12 [cited 2026 Jul. 8];15(1):44-9. Available from: https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/iej/article/view/27568
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX
  • Abstract Viewed: 1361 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 828 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Make a Submission

Make a Submission

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Developed By

Open Journal Systems

Indexing/Abstracting

This journal is indexed in:

  • PubMed
  • Europe PMC
  • Scopus
  • SCImago
  • MIAR
  • CINAHL
  • CAS (Chemical Abstracts)
  • Dimensions
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • FATCAT
  • Google Scholar
  • IMEMR (Index Medicus for the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region)
  • Index Copernicus
  • ISC (Islamic World Science Citation Center)
  • Magiran
  • ROAD
  • SID (Scientific Information Database) 
  • SUDOC
  • UC Santa Barbara University
  • WIKIDATA
  • ZDB
    • This journal is Member of: COPE; ICMJ

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Browse

  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact

   Iranian Endodontic Journal is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).

Powered by OJSPlus