Iranian Center for Endodontic Research
  • Login
  • Register

Iranian Endodontic Journal

  • Register
  • Home
  • About the journal
  • Issues
    • Current
    • Archives
  • For Authors/Reviewers
    • Submissions
    • Author Guidelines
    • Ethics Policy
    • Editorial & Peer Review Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Reviewers Information
  • Indexing/Abstracting
  • Editorial Team
  • Announcements
  • Contact Us
  • Congress Proceedings
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 1 No. 1 (2006): SPRING 2006
  4. Original Article

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2006)

April 2006

A Comparative Study of Two Different Methods for Determining the Root Canal Working Length

  • Saeed Moradi
  • Maryam Javidi
  • Roozbeh Rashed
  • Leila Raziee

Iranian Endodontic Journal, Vol. 1 No. 1 (2006), 1 April 2006 , Page 31-35
https://doi.org/10.22037/iej.v1i1.1561 Published: 2010-04-20

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Success in endodontic treatment depends on various factors. Among the most important factors, appropriate preparation of the root canal system and keeping periapical region intact as much as possible could be mentioned. These are achieved by determining the penetration depth of the instruments into the canal i.e. the working length. Several methods are introduced for working length determination. The most popular techniques in this regard are the use of conventional radiography and electronic apex locators. A new type of apex locator is the Root ZX. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy rate of Root ZX apex locator with the conventional radiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The working length of thirty extracted single rooted teeth were determined by the means of the Root ZX and conventional radiography then compared with the actual working lengths measured by the stereomicroscope. RESULTS: The results showed there was statistically significant difference between the length determined by the Root ZX and stereomicroscope. In addition, the radiographic and stereomicroscopic working lengths had statistically significant differences as well. There was also significant difference between the lengths measured by the Root ZX and radiography. CONCLUSION: It is recommended to use the Root ZX and radiography both together to reach the most accurate working length.

Keywords:
  • Apex Locator
  • Conventional Radiography
  • Root ZX
  • Working Length
  • PDF

How to Cite

1.
Moradi S, Javidi M, Rashed R, Raziee L. A Comparative Study of Two Different Methods for Determining the Root Canal Working Length. Iran Endod J [Internet]. 2010 Apr. 20 [cited 2026 Jul. 8];1(1):31-5. Available from: https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/iej/article/view/1561
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX
  • Abstract Viewed: 464 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 367 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Make a Submission

Make a Submission

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Developed By

Open Journal Systems

Indexing/Abstracting

This journal is indexed in:

  • PubMed
  • Europe PMC
  • Scopus
  • SCImago
  • MIAR
  • CINAHL
  • CAS (Chemical Abstracts)
  • Dimensions
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • FATCAT
  • Google Scholar
  • IMEMR (Index Medicus for the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region)
  • Index Copernicus
  • ISC (Islamic World Science Citation Center)
  • Magiran
  • ROAD
  • SID (Scientific Information Database) 
  • SUDOC
  • UC Santa Barbara University
  • WIKIDATA
  • ZDB
    • This journal is Member of: COPE; ICMJ

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Browse

  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact

   Iranian Endodontic Journal is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).

Powered by OJSPlus