Laparoscopic -2port Varicocelectomy with Scarless Periumblical Mini-Incision: Initial Experience in Approach and Outcomes

Won Ik Seo, Jong Kyou Kwon, Pil Moon Kang, Wansuk Kim, Jang Ho Yoon, Taek Sang Kim, Jae Seung Chung, Cheol Kyu Oh

Abstract


185

Purpose: As with other areas, there have been many efforts for minimally invasive surgery in varicocelectomy. We present our initial experience with laparoscopic varicocelectomy with a two-port scarless periumbilical mini-incision.
Materials and Methods: The study enrolled 18 patients who underwent laparoscopic varicocelectomy with a twoport
scarless periumbilical mini-incision from February 2012 to April 2013. The laparoscopic varicocelectomy was performed using two 5-mm ports at periumbilical sites in skin creases. Here, the surgical procedure is introduced and the outcomes of the case series are summarized. We reviewed other laparoscopic techniques and compared them with our technique.
Results: The mean patient age was 34.8 years. Of the 18 patients, 15 had grade 3 varicoceles. The mean operating
time was 62.5 minutes. Postoperatively, the scrotal pain level decreased immediately from a mean VAS score of 6.3 to 4.4 and then to 1.7 by 24 hours postoperatively. The mean hospital stay was 2.8 days. Complications included one hydrocele and two recurrent varicoceles. The operating time decreased as the surgeon’s experience increased.
Conclusion: Laparoscopic varicocelectomy with a two-port scarless periumbilical mini-incision is a feasible technique that can be mastered relatively easily. Prospective and comparative studies are required to validate this new technique.

Full Text:

PDF

87

References


Baazeem A, Belzile E, Ciampi A, et al. Varicocele and male factor infertility treatment: A new meta-analysis and review of the role of varicocele repair. Eur Urol. 2011;60(4):796-808.

Diegidio P, Jhaveri JK, Ghannam S, Pinkhasov R, Shabsigh R, Fisch H. Review of current varicocelectomy techniques and their outcomes. BJU Int. 2011;108(7):1157-72.

Wang J, Xia SJ, Liu ZH, et al. Inguinal and subinguinal micro-varicocelectomy, the optimal surgical management of varicocele: A meta-analysis. Asian J Androl. 2015;17(1):74-80.

Ding H, Tian J, Du W, Zhang L, Wang H, Wang Z. Open non-microsurgical, laparoscopic or open microsurgical varicocelectomy for male infertility: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BJU Int. 2012;110(10):1536-42.

Al-Kandari AM, Shabaan H, Ibrahim HM, Elshebiny YH, Shokeir AA. Comparison of outcomes of different varicocelectomy techniques: Open inguinal, laparoscopic, and subinguinal microscopic varicocelectomy: A randomized clinical trial. Urology. 2007;69(3):417-20.

Riccabona M, Oswald J, Koen M, Lusuardi L, Radmayr C, Bartsch G. Optimizing the operative treatment of boys with varicocele: Sequential comparison of 4 techniques. J Urol. 2003;169(2):666-8.

McManus MC, Barqawi A, Meacham RB, Furness PD,3rd, Koyle MA. Laparoscopic varicocele ligation: Are there advantages compared with the microscopic subinguinal approach? Urology. 2004;64(2):357-60; discussion 360-1.

Lee KW, Poon CM, Leung KF, Lee DW, Ko CW. Two-port needlescopic cholecystectomy: Prospective study of 100 cases. Hong Kong Med J. 2005;11(1):30-5.

Tagaya N, Rokkaku K, Kubota K. Needlescopic cholecystectomy versus needlescope-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007;17(5):375-9.

Clayman RV, Box GN, Abraham JB, et al. Rapid communication: Transvaginal single-port NOTES nephrectomy: Initial laboratory experience. J Endourol. 2007;21(6):640-4.

Kaouk JH, Haber GP, Goel RK, et al. Single-port laparoscopic surgery in urology: Initial experience. Urology. 2008;71(1):3-6.

Lee SW, Lee JY, Kim KH, Ha US. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus conventional laparoscopic varicocele ligation in men with palpable varicocele: A randomized, clinical study. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(4):1056-62.

Link BA, Kruska JD, Wong C, Kropp BP. Two trocar laparoscopic varicocelectomy: Approach and outcomes. JSLS. 2006;10(2):151-4.

Zampieri N, Cervellione RM. Varicocele in adolescents: A 6-year longitudinal and followup observational study. J Urol. 2008;180(4 Suppl):1653-6; discussion 1656.

Kumanov P, Robeva RN, Tomova A. Adolescent varicocele: Who is at risk? Pediatrics. 2008;121(1):e53-7.

Stavropoulos NE, Mihailidis I, Hastazeris K, et al. Varicocele in schoolboys. Arch Androl. 2002;48(3):187-192.

Cho KS, Seo JT. Effect of varicocelectomy on male infertility. Korean J Urol. 2014;55(11):703-9.

Greenberg SH. Varicocele and male fertility. Fertil Steril. 1977;28(7):699-706.

Lomboy JR, Coward RM. The varicocele: Clinical presentation, evaluation, and surgical management. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2016;33(3):163-9.

Mohammed A, Chinegwundoh F. Testicular varicocele: An overview. Urol Int. 2009;82(4):373-9.

Mouret P. Celioscopic surgery. evolution or revolution? Chirurgie. 1990;116(10):829-32; discussion 832-3.

Mendez-Gallart R, Bautista-Casasnovas A, Estevez-Martinez E, Varela-Cives R. Laparoscopic palomo varicocele surgery: Lessons learned after 10 years' follow up of 156 consecutive pediatric patients. J Pediatr Urol. 2009;5(2):126-31.

Borruto FA, Impellizzeri P, Antonuccio P, et al. Laparoscopic vs open varicocelectomy in children and adolescents: Review of the recent literature and meta-analysis. J Pediatr Surg. 2010;45(12):2464-9.

VanderBrink BA, Palmer LS, Gitlin J, Levitt SB, Franco I. Lymphatic-sparing laparoscopic varicocelectomy versus microscopic varicocelectomy: Is there a difference? Urology. 2007;70(6):1207-10.

Youssef T, Abdalla E. Single incision transumbilical laparoscopic varicocelectomy versus the conventional laparoscopic technique: A randomized clinical study. Int J Surg. 2015;18:178-83.

Friedersdorff F, Aghdassi SJ, Werthemann P, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) varicocelectomy with reusable components: Comparison with the conventional laparoscopic technique. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(10):3646-52.

Wang J, Xue B, Shan YX, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery with a single channel versus conventional laparoscopic varicocele ligation: A prospective randomized study. J Endourol. 2014;28(2):159-64.

Zhang Z, Zheng SJ, Yu W, et al. Comparison of surgical effect and postoperative patient experience between laparoendoscopic single-site and conventional laparoscopic varicocelectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Androl. 2017;19(2):248-255.

Simforoosh N, Ziaee SA, Behjati S, Beygi FM, Arianpoor A, Abdi H. .Laparoscopic management of varicocele using bipolar cautery versus open high ligation technique: a randomized, clinical trial. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2007;17(6):743-747.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22037/uj.v0i0.3869


Creative Commons License 
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License