• Logo
  • SBMUJournals

Medical Journalism and Emergency Medicine

Saeed Safari, Alireza Baratloo, Mahmoud Yousefifard



Nowadays, many researches in the field of medicine are conducting all around the world and medical journalism is a way to share the results. In fact, dissemination of the related manuscripts can prevent the repetitive research or may even lead to conducting a better survey. Therefore high quality medical journals are considered as up-to-date resources for further investigations. Medical journals are propagating their papers in various media including television programs, newspapers, internet websites and different social media. So they can influence the government policy makers, health-care professionals and even public. Moreover, most researchers hear about medical discoveries for the first time through medical journals and their related social media. So as well a high quality journal can help to improve medical science, a journal of poor quality can be damaging and distorting. Indeed, popular journals have the power of inventing a “communication storm” to draw attention to a certain topic. Thus they have to respect the accepted international principles to prevent spreading inaccurate and misleading data. This paper aims to review the previous and current situation of medical journalism by focus on field of emergency medicine.


Medical Journalism; Emergency; Medicine; Manuscript; Research


Godlee F, Jefferson T, Callaham M, et al. Peer review in health sciences. London: BMJ books London; 2003. p. 19.

Phillips DP, Kanter EJ, Bednarczyk B, Tastad PL. Importance of the lay press in the transmission of medical knowledge to the scientific community. N Engl J Med. 1991;325(16):1180-3.

Larsson A, Oxman AD, Carling C, Herrin J. Medical messages in the media–barriers and solutions to improving medical journalism. Health Expect. 2003;6(4):323-31.

Laurent MR, Vickers TJ. Seeking health information online: does Wikipedia matter? J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16(4):471-9.

Cassels AK. The media-medicine mix: quality concerns in medical reporting. Open Med. 2007;1(1):e52.

Carducci A, Alfani S, Sassi M, Cinini A, Calamusa A. Mass media health information: quantitative and qualitative analysis of daily press coverage and its relation with public perceptions. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;82(3):475-8.

Dentzer S. Communicating medical news—pitfalls of health care journalism. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(1):1-3.

Cassedy JH. The flourishing and character of early American medical journalism, 1797–1860. J Hist Med Allied Sci. 1983;38(2):135-50.

Banks D. Starting science in the vernacular. Notes on some early issues of the Philosophical Transactions and the Journal des Sçavans, 1665-1700. ASp la revue du GERAS. 2009;55:5-22.

Awais SM. Science and scope of peer review. Annals. 2008;14(2):42.

Campbell N, Smellie RMS, CAMERON p. The Royal Society of Edinburgh(1783-1983). The First Two Hundred Years. 1 ed. London: The Royal Society of Edinburgh; 1983. p. 186.

Kahn RJ, Kahn PG. The Medical Repository--the first US medical journal (1797-1824). N Engl J Med. 1997;337(26):1926-30.

Billings JS. IV. Literature and Institutions. Am J Med Sci. 1876;144:439-80.

Waters HF-G. The New England historical and genealogical register. London: New England Historic Genealogical Society; 1934. p. 112.

Azizi M-H, Raees-Jalali G-A, Noroozi H. A Brief History of the Publication of Biomedical Journals in Iran between 1901 and 1979. Arch Iran Med. 2009;12(2):204.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22037/emergency.v3i3.8944


  • There are currently no refbacks.